10 Reasons Bush was better than Obama

184550

Guest
Original poster
May 8, 2008
1,978
2
According to the British newspaper correspondent Nile Gardiner of 'The Telegraph' these are the 10 reasons that Bush was better than Obama.

I've read through the list and I can agree with most of them. I particularly agree with numbers 1, 4 and 7-10.
 

184550

Guest
Original poster
May 8, 2008
1,978
2
So you're part of that 21% of supporters.
Of what? Bush over Obama? Palin over Obama? Don't flatter yourselves, I voted for Obama just the same as you did. Just because I voted for him doesn't mean I agree 100 percent with all his policies that he has chosen to institute, mainly his foreign policies, which is what is largely talked about in the article.
 

Sydde

macrumors 68020
Aug 17, 2009
2,104
2,162
IOKWARDI
Nile Gardiner said:
But few would argue today that the people of Iraq were better off living under a monstrous tyrant like Saddam Hussein.
Except for maybe most Iraqi women, children who wish they still had all their limbs, really, all but a small minority of the people who live there. This guy should avoid making ridiculous unsupportable statements.
 

Dont Hurt Me

macrumors 603
Dec 21, 2002
6,056
6
Yahooville S.C.
Obama only got elected because Bush and his Republican bought off draft dodging whores f up'd everything they touched and left such a train wreck that the only choice was to allow the pathetic democrat party a chance to fix it. We are a split Nation because both partys suck and are excellent at it. It was simply the democrats turn to destroy our country.

Bush was so horrible it got Obama in but to say he was better then Obama is like saying the pig crap on the bottom of your right shoe is better then the horse crap on the bottom of your other shoe. Crap is crap and so are both of these partys and the candidates that float to the top of the piles.

Neither Bush or Obama ever held or created a real job as far as I can tell.
 

chstr

macrumors 6502a
Mar 25, 2009
673
0
for the love of god, stop these retarded threads. you can start them after obama's been in office 8 years, until then the point is moot.
 

paddy

macrumors 6502a
Jun 25, 2005
653
0
TN
Of what? Bush over Obama? Palin over Obama? Don't flatter yourselves, I voted for Obama just the same as you did. Just because I voted for him doesn't mean I agree 100 percent with all his policies that he has chosen to institute, mainly his foreign policies, which is what is largely talked about in the article.
I'm not American, so trust me Bush's foreign policies were horrendous. Absolutely atrocious and inexcusable. The only reason Americans have a half decent image worldwide today is because of Obama.

I assumed you were part of the 20 odd percent of those who supported Bush back in the day because you agreed with that morons article.
 

gibbz

macrumors 68030
May 31, 2007
2,691
91
I should have stopped reading the list after #1. To say that a desirable quality is to never apologize or acknowledge mistakes is laughable at best. To further say that making said apologies projects weakness is just plain stupid. That is the same kind of 'with us or against us' crap that prevailed for Bush's 8 years.
 

skunk

macrumors G4
Jun 29, 2002
11,745
3,995
Republic of Ukistan
Obama only got elected because Bush and his Republican bought off draft dodging whores f up'd everything they touched and left such a train wreck that the only choice was to allow the pathetic democrat party a chance to fix it. We are a split Nation because both partys suck and are excellent at it. It was simply the democrats turn to destroy our country.

Bush was so horrible it got Obama in but to say he was better then Obama is like saying the pig crap on the bottom of your right shoe is better then the horse crap on the bottom of your other shoe. Crap is crap and so are both of these partys and the candidates that float to the top of the piles.
Poetry. Sheer poetry. Thank you as always, DHM, for your succinct and pellucid analysis. :)
 

Macaddicttt

macrumors 6502a
Apr 22, 2004
992
2
San Diego, CA
Really the article boils down to, "GWB boiled a complex world down to black and white, ignoring reality, and that made me feel better because I didn't have to think as hard about what the right thing to do was."
 

Sydde

macrumors 68020
Aug 17, 2009
2,104
2,162
IOKWARDI
for the love of god, stop these retarded threads. you can start them after obama's been in office 8 years, until then the point is moot.
Pardon me while I got out and check under the bridge. I have this sneaking feeling...
 

184550

Guest
Original poster
May 8, 2008
1,978
2
for the love of god, stop these retarded threads. you can start them after obama's been in office 8 years, until then the point is moot.
Oh, that's right. I forgot that everyone waited until January 2009 to start the Bush hate fest. :rolleyes:
 

yojitani

macrumors 68000
Apr 28, 2005
1,855
10
An octopus's garden
Just because I voted for him doesn't mean I agree 100 percent with all his policies that he has chosen to institute, mainly his foreign policies, which is what is largely talked about in the article.
Odd. While I agree to an extent with DHM too, Obama's foreign policy is the best thing going for him right now IMHO.
 

Rt&Dzine

macrumors 6502a
Oct 8, 2008
736
5
Or racist by a certian former president. ;)

My changes in bold.
It's almost become fashionable to bash Obama. Bush was mostly untouchable during his first term because of 9/11. You were considered a terrorist sympathizer if you criticized him.
 
I thought it best to present a short version of the article with my reply.

1. Bush never apologised for his country
Barack Obama has apologised for America’s past actions in practically every speech he’s given on foreign soil, and has humiliatingly referred to America’s “arrogance”. In contrast, George W. Bush’s speeches before international audiences were filled with pride for America’s history and achievements, with an uncompromising belief in the greatness of his country.

Barrack doesn’t have pride in America. He doesn’t believe in the greatness of this country and that is evident is his domestic addresses as well.

2. Bush identified and confronted evil <<< HUGE!!!
There was something very refreshing in George W. Bush’s Reaganesque interpretation of the world in terms of good and evil. In contrast, Barack Obama has viewed the globe largely in shades of grey, with a reluctance to describe who exactly America’s enemies are, from North Korea and Iran to Islamist terrorists.
I don’t think Barack Obama views the world in shades of grey. I think he just sides with the evil, for what purpose I don’t know.

3. Bush made the advance of freedom a key component of his agenda
The spread of freedom and liberty was always a centerpiece of the Bush agenda. His critics derided this approach as unrealistic, or as a grandiose dream. In marked contrast, Barack Obama rarely mentions the word freedom, and the issue of human rights is far down his list of priorities.

That is because it cannot be politicized to support his radical left wing agenda.

4. Bush defended national sovereignty <<< Again HUGE !!!
One of the biggest shifts in US foreign policy under the Obama administration has been its willingness to undermine national sovereignty, and its desire to give more power to supranational institutions such as the United Nations.

This alone should concern American more than anything else the Obama administration is doing. This will reduce America to an annex of another government, remove our freedom and subjugate us to some other authority. This nation is founded in a principle that is exactly the opposite of what he is doing.

5. Bush believed in the Special Relationship
I don’t recall George W Bush ever throwing a bust of Churchill out of the Oval Office or giving the British Prime Minister an insulting pack of DVDs. Under Obama, the Anglo-American alliance has reached its lowest point since the Suez Crisis of 1956, a damning indictment of his world leadership. Barack Obama cannot even bring himself to mention Britain in a major policy address or acknowledge the sacrifice of British forces in Afghanistan.

Consider reason #2. He can’t apologize to our enemies and embrace our allies at the same time.

6. Bush cultivated key allies
But he did invest a great deal of time and effort in cultivating a strong personal relationship with several key European leaders, including Tony Blair, Jose Maria Aznar and Silvio Berlusconi. President Obama has largely ignored building alliances with European heads of state, and seems indifferent towards the transatlantic alliance.

This is a mystery to me. But I fear Barrack has a hidden agenda we have yet to see that has something to do with this poor leadership.

8. Bush believed in fighting a global war
One of the gravest mistakes of Obama’s first year in office has been his reluctance to describe the conflict against al-Qaeda and its backers as a global war.

Back to the hidden agenda on this one as well. Ignore the global war is like the frog ignoring the scorpions stinger. (If you know the story of the Frog and the Scorpion.)

9. Bush did not compromise US security
The Obama administration’s zealous drive to dismantle the Bush administration’s infrastructure for dealing with al-Qaeda, including the promised closure of the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, is having zero effect on lessening the threat the United States faces from Islamist terrorists.

This is just bizzare. After 911 we had to look back at thirty years of attacks on America by Islamic terrorist. Al-Qaeda being a large majority of those attacks. Barrack and company blame 7 years of George Bush’s war on terror for creating more terrorist. It the stuff grade school children make up when asked their opinion on current events.

10. Bush did not send mixed messages in the face of the enemy
A constant theme of Barack Obama’s speeches has been to describe the war in Iraq as a “war of choice”, underscoring his own intense opposition to the war, hardly a message of support for the more than 100,000 U.S. soldiers still stationed in the country.

In all honesty Barrack isn’t sending mixed messages either. He is clearly saying the United States has to apologize and we were wrong to protect or life, liberty and sovereignty against them.
 

Sydde

macrumors 68020
Aug 17, 2009
2,104
2,162
IOKWARDI
I thought it best to present a short version of the article with my reply.

1. Bush never apologised for his country
2. Bush identified and confronted evil <<< HUGE!!!
The problem here is that Bush failed to identify what was staring at him from the bathroom mirror in the morning. "Evil" truly is a matter of perspective. The fact that some guys seek to do us harm because they believe we are "evil" and so we believe they are evil because they want to do us harm does not have a simple answer. The other guys must believe that we are "evil" for some particular reason, and it is most likely not a single reason. The deciding factor against Bush was that he chose to use the situation to his own advantage instead of quietly dealing with the problem
9. Bush did not compromise US security
This one is pretty big. Bush did more to compromise US security by his reckless cowboy grandstanding and martial actions than any good he might have done. The more enemies you make, the more you have to struggle to defend yourself, against a specific enemy that only gains strength the more you attack it.