7 yr old shot by grandmother

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by Ugg, Aug 19, 2014.

  1. Ugg macrumors 68000

    Ugg

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2003
    Location:
    Penryn
    #1
    Reuters

    Tell me again why arming paranoid Americans is a good idea?
     
  2. TheHateMachine macrumors 6502a

    TheHateMachine

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    #2
    Oh Florida, the state that I try to avoid as much as possible.
     
  3. Huntn macrumors G5

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #3
    Wait a minute, did I get this right? Grand kids visiting, apparently sleeping in another room, Grandmother props a chair against her bedroom door for her own protections and when the door opens, she shoots the intruder? If it is as described, charges should be filed. This should not be written off as an accident or "one of those unfortunate things" as our forum gun lobby likes to suggest. :)
     
  4. jkcerda Suspended

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #4
    who armed her?

    woman should face charges for negligence at the least.
     
  5. LizKat macrumors 68040

    LizKat

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Location:
    Catskill Mountains
    #5
    In some states and circumstances, physicians are forbidden to discuss gun safety issues with parents of children hospitalized over gunshot wounds. A federal judge tried to stick a permanent injunction against enforcing such laws in Florida a few years ago. At the federal level HHS (Health and Human Services) remains forbidden to collect stats on gun ownership, storage, etc.

    Anyway that court's assessment was based on potential interference with the physician's First Amendment Rights. So far when the 1st and 2nd amendments are seen as bumping into each other, the NRA's use of the First Amendment to defend squashing doctors' use of the same amendment seems to be winning.

    http://www.tampabay.com/news/health/case-in-florida-addresses-doctors-freedom-to-ask-patients-about-guns/1263732
     
  6. Tomorrow macrumors 604

    Tomorrow

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    Location:
    Always a day away
  7. bradl macrumors 68040

    bradl

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    #7
    I wonder what HIPAA would have to say about that. Because that is absolutely disgusting.

    BL.
     
  8. LizKat macrumors 68040

    LizKat

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Location:
    Catskill Mountains
    #8
    Actually I think it's HIPAA's privacy laws that the NRA uses in part to maintain its so far successful campaigns to prevent federal collection of data that conjoins info on gun ownership / storage and incidence of death or injury due to gunshot wounds. I believe there have been various efforts to separate the very idea of collection of gunshot stats from concepts of patient privacy laws, but so far to little avail.

    What the hell. It is not and cannot be some huge secret that tens of thousands of people die or are killed by gunshot every year in a country with so many weapons in so many hands. I guess the NRA would like to keep the publicity down to a dull roar. Shovelling sand against the tide, I say.

    Meanwhile I guess we are supposed to think of guns as things that outdoorsy people have in their hands at the edge of the forest on a crisp late autumn day with a 12-point buck in the background. God knows what a doctor thinks when he's treating yet another sub-teen shot by a relative, but apparently our laws still largely prefer that he keep those thoughts to himself and just mind his stitching.
     
  9. bradl macrumors 68040

    bradl

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    #9
    I'm actually thinking the other way around. How is the NRA knowing about what is being discussed between a doctor and their patient and/or parent/legal guardian of the patient without violating HIPAA? They can not know that without discussing medical issues with someone, which is a violation of HIPAA in itself. So HIPAA could theoretically be thrown back in their face and give them their own smacking down for even talking about this to begin with.

    BL.
     
  10. LizKat macrumors 68040

    LizKat

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Location:
    Catskill Mountains
    #10
    Hah. I like it!

    Anyway you want to look at it, telling a doctor what he can and cannot discuss with a patient is just theatre of the absurd.

    A doctor who sees kid after kid come in dead or injured by other kids, or by relatives cleaning the gun or relatives discovering the gun and fooling around with it, or by relatives bent on punishing someone for being alive.... whatever....

    How many times before this doctor naturally starts figuring the way to cut that down in his own experience is to start talking it up. At professional meetings. With the patients. With the patients’ relatives. With law enforcement. With the media.

    Who is the NRA to tell a physician he cannot seek to help prevent gun violence by discussing gun safety and storage issues? He sees the results of silence and suppression of this dialogue in his practice year after year, and should have every right to try to mitigate it.
     
  11. SLC Flyfishing Suspended

    SLC Flyfishing

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2007
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #11
    It's quite simple. NRA simply asks people if their doctors bring up firearm ownership during visits. There is nothing remotely illegal about this.

    It's not a violation of HIPAA to ask someone a question. Patient's are free to share (or not share) any of their health information with whoever they want, and whenever they want.

    It is a violation of HIPAA for the physician or staff to share health information without the patient's consent.

    ----------

    The NRA doesn't do this, at least not to my knowledge. We are all taught to bring up firearm ownership with patient's and parents during our well visits etc.

    There are some folks who think this is a government method of collecting info on who does and who doesn't own guns. It's not, at least not officially; though the NSA could probably spy on my records if they really wanted to. But the physicians are not asking these questions to build a database of gun owners. We do it so we can talk to kids and adults about safety and risky behaviors. It's good if you've already had the conversation with the patient who presents with suicidal thoughts; you can try and put something in place to keep the gun from being used in a suicide attempt.

    I'm very pro-2nd ammendment, but as a soon to be physician, guns are something I make every effort to discuss with my patients. They can choose to answer me or not, or whether or not to answer truthfully. It's up to them.
     
  12. bradl macrumors 68040

    bradl

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    #12
    It isn't the NRA's business, nor anyone else's business to know if their doctors bring up firearm ownership during visits. The fact that they do that and try to shroud it under the context of free speech is highly unethical.

    BL.
     
  13. Nukemkb macrumors 6502a

    Nukemkb

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2006
    Location:
    Columbia, SC
    #13
    Let's take her out and shoot her too! Grandmother shooting grand kids Despicable.
     
  14. LizKat macrumors 68040

    LizKat

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Location:
    Catskill Mountains
    #14
    Well, I dunno. Here's another clip on Florida and its effort to keep docs from discussing guns with patients.

    http://www.npr.org/2011/05/07/136063523/florida-bill-could-muzzle-doctors-on-gun-safety

    This one quotes an NRA lobbyist as saying just the pediatrician's question about gun ownership is an intrusion on 2nd-A rights. (!?)
     
  15. SLC Flyfishing Suspended

    SLC Flyfishing

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2007
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #15
    Why? Because you don't like it?

    You ask people many questions a day, most of which someone else would consider "none of your business".

    Pro tip: if anyone asks you if your doc collects info on firearm ownership, just refuse to answer.
     
  16. hulugu macrumors 68000

    hulugu

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Location:
    the faraway towns
    #16
    In 2011, Florida passed a law that restricted doctors from asking if guns were in the home.

    This law was declared Constitutional by a 11th Circuit court decision.
     
  17. Michael Goff macrumors G3

    Michael Goff

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    #17
    No, it's because it isn't the NRA's business. There are some things, and by some I mean most, that don't depend on whether somebody likes it or not.
     
  18. bradl macrumors 68040

    bradl

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    #18
    Because in working at a doctor's office, I know how much it would cost from a liability and litigation standpoint it would be to discuss such information to those who should not be privy to it, such as a 4th party to your medical records (1st, 2nd, and 3rd parties being doctor, family, and health insurance company). You should know that as well, being a doctor yourself.

    Your doctor, as you have chosen him, has helped to take on the responsibility to keep you healthy. When the NRA has done the same and earned the degree for it, then they can be considered the same.

    BL.
     
  19. LizKat macrumors 68040

    LizKat

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Location:
    Catskill Mountains
    #19
    Unbelievable finding: that the law was a “legitimate regulation of professional conduct” and that the limits it imposed were “incidental.”

    Here’s a longer piece from Tampa Tribune about the ruling, which was 2-1 with a feisty dissent from the minority vote.

    Federal court upholds Fla.'s docs vs. glocks law
     
  20. SLC Flyfishing Suspended

    SLC Flyfishing

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2007
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #20
    You didn't read my first post on the matter properly. I'm saying that the NRA can ask patients if they are asked about gun ownership by their physicians. Those patients are free to respond or not. This is not a HIPAA violation.

    Now if the NRA comes to me and asks about Steve Jenkins, my 46 year old patient. Giving them info WOULD be a HIPAA violation (if I did so without first obtaining Mr. Jenkins consent).

    And the NRA is not trying to be a health care provider. I'm not sure how that last comparison is valid. They are merely collecting data that they are interested in, not giving out medical advice. This is no different than any other organization that asks questions about the doctor patient relationship.

    ----------

    Whether or not you (the literal and collective you) think it's their business or not really has no bearing on the matter.

    These types of questions are asked every single day, by many different people and organizations. I don't see you condemning the practice elsewhere.

    I mean any poll could be considered "none of their business" depending on who you ask. The folks that feel that way usually indicate as much when they refuse to answer/participate.

    Not a complicated concept.
     
  21. Thomas Veil macrumors 68020

    Thomas Veil

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2004
    Location:
    OBJECTIVE reality
    #21
    Until the day I die, I will not be able to comprehend what the hell is so hard about saying two words: "Who's there?"
     
  22. Michael Goff macrumors G3

    Michael Goff

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    #22
    I don't condemn things I don't know about, no.
     
  23. citizenzen macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    #23
    And feel free to add, "Don't come a step closer. I have a gun and I know how to use it."
     
  24. Renzatic Suspended

    Renzatic

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Location:
    Gramps, what the hell am I paying you for?
    #24
    But then they know where you're at by the sound of your voice, and open fire in your general direction. YOU'LL DIE! Better to shoot first and not risk anything.
     
  25. Michael Goff macrumors G3

    Michael Goff

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    #25
    I hope you're being sarcastic.
     

Share This Page