A discussion about god...

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by phas3, Apr 17, 2012.

  1. phas3 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    #1
    So me and my girlfriend just had a heated discussion about god. Not religion but God/Jesus because she says she's a christian but doesn't really believe in religion but does believe in god.

    I was raised a Catholic and as I grew older I started to stem away from that way of thinking and exercised the ideas of science but still believe in a higher power such as god.

    See my way of thinking she says that I'm contradicting myself and that if I am a true believe of God that I would not be exercising the ideas of science. I'm either in or I'm out.

    I find that I'm not playing both fields but I keep an open mind to the other possibilities out there, its not that one day I'm a believer in god and the next I'm all about science. I called her on her biased towards god and she claims she's not biased blah blah blah.

    The argument which just started out calm and was just a discussion turned into a heated debate/argument. At which point she claimed that she didn't even care about what everyone else thinks unless they are all about God.

    After that, I told her the discussion was over and what the heck was she doing arguing for.

    The point of this thread is to see if it is possible to believe in god and at the same time be open minded to the other possibilities that isn't god.

    I want to hear from others who strongly believe in god, and those that don't. I want to see if her rationality is right or wrong.
     
  2. Huntn macrumors P6

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #2
    It's sounds to me like your girlfriend has made her mind up and does not want anyone to confuse her with alternate possibilities.

    God and science are not exclusive from each other. Both could exist hand in hand. The problem is the Bible and people reading the Bible as the 100% truth, when in actuality it's a bunch of old stories handed down through millennium with no more weight than any other fairy tale.
     
  3. Sydde macrumors 68020

    Sydde

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    #3
    Just explain to her that science is man's way to explore how god does some of the things it does.
     
  4. phas3 thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    #4
    this also came up, I like to play the devils advocate. I told her everything that everyone believes about GOD/Jesus comes from a book, a book created by man.

    And she tells me to go on the internet and look up some of the evidence that they have found about the existence of god. And to quote "artifacts and scrolls" SCROLLS THAT WERE CREATED BY MAN! COME ON!
     
  5. MonkeySee.... macrumors 68040

    MonkeySee....

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2010
    Location:
    UK
    #5
    So you say you use scientific reasoning but also think their is some hairy bearded chap in the sky?

    I'm with you other half*. Sorry.

    *contradicting yourself
     
  6. phas3 thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    #6
    not exactly, I do believe that there is a God, but I keep an open mind to other possibilities.

    I believe that there is only soo much science can do until it is up to God. Her argument is that if I do believe in god, then I can't keep an open mind to other possibilities.
     
  7. MonkeySee.... macrumors 68040

    MonkeySee....

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2010
    Location:
    UK
    #7
    Sorry you lost me. :D

    If you're open to other possibilities then you must be doubting your belief in God, no? That won't get you into "heaven" you know. ;)

    You'll end up rotting on earth with the rest of us Atheists.
     
  8. phas3 thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    #8
    okay I think I see the lost in translation lol, I'm open to other possibilities but it doesn't mean that I follow them....does that make sense?

    If something happens and its unexplainable, my first thought is God. My first thought is not "this unexplainable event can be explained by science". Yeah maybe it can be, but my first thought is God.
     
  9. niuniu macrumors 68020

    niuniu

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    A man of the people. The right sort of people.
    #9
    Two people arguing about something neither are able to prove.

    Always fruitful.
     
  10. citizenzen macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    #10
    Buddhists believe (and experience) "formless fields of benefaction".

    We just don't call it "God" ... make it human ... etc.
     
  11. ericrwalker macrumors 68030

    ericrwalker

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2008
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    #11
    I am with you on this. I am open to the possibility that there is a greater being that created everything. Maybe one God, maybe many, or maybe it's all just science. That's why I fall into the agnostic category.

    I always keep the possibility that the people in bible stories as they were either high, schizophrenic, or suffering from heat exhaustion. There is also the possibility that immaculate conception story was the cover to a cheating spouse story.
     
  12. MonkeySee.... macrumors 68040

    MonkeySee....

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2010
    Location:
    UK
    #12
    ahhh I gotcha. Well in hindsight, you'll never win an argument with a women so you may as well give up now ;)
     
  13. phas3 thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    #13
    that I know is TRUE and its FACT, god proven and science proven lol. Hence her last sentence "I don't care about what you or anyone else thinks anyway"
     
  14. AP_piano295 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2005
    #14
    So you're saying a part of your mind is open to reasoned thought and study.

    While the other part of your mind assumes that Zeus is the cause of all lighting?

    You're just arguing a "god of the gaps" perspective while your girlfriend wants to explain everything with "god" regardless if those gaps have already been filled or not.
     
  15. Tomorrow macrumors 604

    Tomorrow

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    Location:
    Always a day away
    #15
    This.

    </thread>
     
  16. AP_piano295 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2005
    #16
    Yes they are: science is the study of the physical world based on empirical data.

    God and other such concepts are not based in the natural world hence the term "supernatural". The supernatural is separate from scientific study and exploration.
     
  17. Macaddicttt macrumors 6502a

    Macaddicttt

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    #17
    It depends on how you mean the word "exclusive."

    Yes, they are exclusive in that they do not concern themselves with each other, so it is possible to hold both in your mind.

    No, they are not exclusive in that if you subscribe to one, you cannot subscribe to the other; it is in fact possible to hold both in your mind without contradiction.
     
  18. AP_piano295 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2005
    #18
    It is possible though not advisable, leaving a "space" in your mind for god as an explanation for anything in the physical world is poor scientific practice.

    Facts should be used to build theories.

    Theories should not be built in the absence of facts. It seems unfortunately inevitable that thiests use their beliefs to influence the physical "real" world where their beliefs have no place.
     
  19. Mousse macrumors 68000

    Mousse

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2008
    Location:
    Flea Bottom, King's Landing
    #19
    Oh...eh? I think I got the gist of what the OP is talking about. Think of what Science has explained to us about existence and everything as a tiny bubble. Everything in that bubble, he says, "Science can explain this." Everything outside the bubble, he attributes to God.

    As time goes on and our science discovers more about everything around us, the bubble expands. What was once the purview of God is now within mortal reach. For him, and for me as well, there will always be things that cannot be explained by any science we know of. Ergo, Science and God can easily co-exist in our line of thinking.

    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
    Than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
     
  20. 0dev macrumors 68040

    0dev

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Location:
    127.0.0.1
    #20
    When it comes to matters of religion, I have two words: Russell's Teapot.

    If someone wants to claim there's some sort of all-powerful god up there, the burden of proof lies on that person to prove it, not on me to disprove it. Since, in the case of Christianity (and in fact most religions) the only "proof" is a 2,000 year old story book, they might as well claim Harry Potter is real.

    I will happily become religious the day there is actual solid scientific evidence for a god. I base my beliefs on what can be proven at the current time.
     
  21. AP_piano295 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2005
    #21
    In other words god of the gaps.

    I don't know so I'll make something up until I do know. And because we can never know everything there will always be places where my fantasy can exist.
     
  22. Huntn macrumors P6

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #22
    No he's not. He is staying open minded.

    When it comes to God there is NO evidence, which leaves only faith. Does that mean faith could not possibly lead you in the right direction?

    If there was a supreme being just how petty do you think it would be? :)
     
  23. Zombie Acorn macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #23
    A few thousand years ago you would be arguing about Zues and Hera :( Of course if a lightning storm started you could just say "look you angered the gods". Auto win.
     
  24. Macaddicttt macrumors 6502a

    Macaddicttt

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2004
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    #24
    No, you seem to misunderstand religion. It's purview is not the empirical unknown, but rather the non-empirical. Science cannot empirically figure out, for example, the meaning of life, as science describes the how, not the why. Science cannot answer what is "good" or "bad," merely what is.

    Religion should concern itself only with the questions that science cannot answer, that is, the questions that science has no ability to answer, not the questions that science currently can't answer, but might in the future.
     
  25. Huntn macrumors P6

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #25
    I've been arguing for neither, just exploration. :D
     

Share This Page