Greetings everyone, I need some advice. I just purchased a 18-80mm 3.5-4.5 Carl Zeiss lens for my Sony Alpha. Currently, I have the 70-200mm 2.8G (recently purchased for around $1500), and the 18-200mm 3.5-6.3 kit lens. My question is this... Should I keep the Carl Zeiss® Vario-Sonnar T* DT 16-80mm f/3.5-4.5 Zoom Lens that I have for $600 Or wait and save up for the Carl Zeiss® Vario-Sonnar T* 24-70mm f2.8 Zoom Lens??? I know the obvious answer is go for the 2.8, but there is roungly an $1100 difference. What I would like anyone to respond with is their opinion. What would you do? I am NOT a professional. I am working hard to become a great photographer as a choice of hobby, I have no intention of turning it into a profession, (I have a hard enough job as it is). I have children, I spend my time with them and my wife, so the majority of my pictures are with them. I am a bit of a perfectionist, which means I have to have the best of everything, (which is why I bought the 70-200 2.8G), but I am starting to realize just how much I am putting into this "hobby" and just want some outside view points. I am aware of both lenses, I know which is better... I guess I am just trying to get an opinion or justification to simply keep what I have. I guess I would also like ot know how much better the CZ lens would be to the Kit 18-200, (I have not shot with it yet). Just shoot your thoughts as to which you would do and perhaps why. Thanks as always!!!!