link Bush's "tough" stance on terror is going to look pretty stupid if it ends up getting us nuked. Then again, I think it'd be the best thing to ever happen to his Presidency. Up to this point, 9/11 gave them carte blanche and they appeared very enthusiastic and unabashed about taking advantage of it to acheive their own unrelated goals (namely Iraq and the PATRIOT acts). Who was it on here that said national security was the most important issue to them because nothing else matters if you're dead? Does Bush's unilateral "**** the world" attitude just put us at high risk for nuclear attack? How many more people would be willing to fund the purchase of such devices after we've "proved" al Qaeda's case for them: that we're hegemonists bent on overtaking the Muslim world?