Another Interstate bridge collapses

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by Sydde, May 23, 2013.

  1. Sydde, May 23, 2013
    Last edited: May 23, 2013

    Sydde macrumors 68020

    Sydde

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    #1
    [​IMG]

    Interstate Five, Skagit river in northern Washington state, cars in the water.
     
  2. citizenzen macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    #2
    Highway 5, eh?

    Just the main north-south thoroughfare connecting Seattle, Portland, Sacramento, Los Angeles and San Diego.

    If we're neglecting that highway, then that's not a good sign.
     
  3. Sydde thread starter macrumors 68020

    Sydde

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    #3
    Well, you know, the Skagit river is north of just about everything, so that part is not so important :rolleyes:
     
  4. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #4
    We have plenty of unsafe bridges in Connecticut, unfortunately our genius governor would rather spend the money to build a busway that nobody will use.
     
  5. DUCKofD3ATH Suspended

    DUCKofD3ATH

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Location:
    Universe 0 Timeline
    #5
    If you're insinuating that the budget for maintaining infrastructure was cut to save money, that just proves government can't be trusted to work in the best interests of the public. They'd rather blow $50 million on make-work projects such as the Washington State Transitional Bilingual Instruction Program.

    TBIP should be cut, but it's somebody's hobbyhorse, so cars end up in the water because government just won't cut the fat.
     
  6. bradl macrumors 68040

    bradl

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    #6
    Yet you just couldn't keep but having to have that KC-X competition for tankers for the USAF, right? That's to the tune of $35 billion (yes, a B). Or the one seeking to replace the VC-25?

    Like I said before, anything but cutting for providing for the common defense.. :rolleyes:

    BL.
     
  7. iMikeT macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Location:
    California
    #7
    Oh that means the corporate sector can buy up the commons and maintain this bridge at a cost to every person who needs to cross it. :rolleyes:

    I think I've cross this bridge going into Vancouver, BC, Canada. It's a weird feeling knowing that a bridge I once crossed collapsed.
     
  8. chown33 macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2009
    #8
  9. citizenzen macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    #9
    I think most bridges over major highways should be able to handle that.

    A truck accident on a highway bridge? Who could have anticipated THAT?!
     
  10. chown33 macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2009
    #10
    Some details:
    http://www.nwcn.com/news/washington...ver-Skagit-River-cars-in-water-208758631.html
    "I saw it. I was less than 50 feet away from the truck when it hit it," witness Dale Ogden told KING 5. "I had just passed it in the fast lane southbound and it had an oversized load. It was approximately 12 feet wide and over 14 feet tall. It was in the slow lane when I came by...I was behind the flag car and in front of the truck in the other lane and I saw the whip - normally tells you how high they can clear - start hitting the bridge. I looked in my rearview mirror knowing this was not going to turn out well."

    "I saw the truck strike the right corner of the bridge. It almost tipped the truck over but it came back down. It tipped it up to about a 30 degree angle to the left and it came back down on its wheels and almost instantaneously behind that I saw girders falling in my rearview mirror."​

    Link taken directly from Wikipedia article.
     
  11. Bug-Creator macrumors 6502

    Bug-Creator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2011
    Location:
    Germany
    #11
    When you follow that link you will get to a picture a truck with sligthly oversized but probraly not overweight load.

    If such an accident is enough to instantly collapse that bridge than the bridge clearly had big issues before.

    From time to time we get trucks hitting bridge while passing under them (most of the time with some construction machine not probraly collapsed before loading) this might lead to the bridge being closed for a safety inspection.

    There also bridges that just fail through the safety inspection and are therefore closed for trucks while the repair is going (like recently the main route over the Rhine near Cologne).

    For those advocating putting it into private hand, what do you think would have happend if the owner (probraly some faceless multicorp) had been faced with this 2 options:

    1) just continue collecting the 1.50 from every car passing
    2) closing the bridge, getting fined for not provideing aggreed service on top of not getting those 1.50 over 2 years and than having to spend 50,000,000 to replace the bridge.

    Anybody who believes they would have opted for 2) without some strong goverment oversight is an utter fool :eek:
     
  12. Eraserhead macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #12
    Quite. This is very shocking.
     
  13. G51989 macrumors 68030

    G51989

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Location:
    NYC NY/Pittsburgh PA
    #13
    The bridge was built in 1955 when even semi trucks were much smaller and lighter, and there was far less traffic to strain the bridge.

    It should have been replaced to keep up with modern safety standards and new traffic loads.

    But hey, screw roads and bridges when we can spend money on planes that don't fly like the f35
     
  14. VulchR macrumors 68020

    VulchR

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    #14
    It seems to me that repairing bridges or replacing those that cannot be repaired would be an excellent way to stimulate the economy....
     
  15. SwiftLives macrumors 65816

    SwiftLives

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2001
    Location:
    Charleston, SC
    #15
    I agree. I don't understand the downside. Spending money on our infrastructure would create jobs - even if they're short term. Furthermore, it's not just highways that need updating. Let's work on our power grid. Let's work on our sewer system. Let's work on drainage in flood-prone areas. Let's work on our water system. There are so many things we can do.
     
  16. mcrain, May 24, 2013
    Last edited: May 24, 2013

    mcrain macrumors 68000

    mcrain

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2002
    Location:
    Illinois
    #16
    China is investing heavily in infrastructure, and we aren't because we have a political party that won't let us.

    Read this: http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/

    (edit) We are failing miserably and our kids will be the ones to pay unless we do something now (but, again, that's kind of the modus operandi of the party that cuts taxes and racks up massive debt).
     
  17. VulchR macrumors 68020

    VulchR

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    #17
    You forgot telecoms... My limited understanding of finances is that interest rates are low, so in the long run wouldn't it be better to invest in infrastructure now so that we do not need to pay as much interest in the future?
     
  18. zioxide macrumors 603

    zioxide

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    #18
    We've been neglecting all of our infrastructure for 30 years.

    This type of thing is just going to happen more and more if we don't start putting money into upgrading our infrastructure. Otherwise, we'll just continue to fall farther behind China, Japan, etc. Corporations don't want to do business in places with failing infrastructure, and we wonder why our economy is falling behind?

    Yup. Our idiot politicians will piss away billions of dollars wasting money on new planes in the name of "defense", but won't spend the money to maintain and upgrade our "Interstate and Defense Highways". Defense was one of the main reasons Eisenhower pushed so hard to build the interstates in the first place. Not like any of the morons in Congress are smart enough to realize that though.
     
  19. jnpy!$4g3cwk macrumors 65816

    jnpy!$4g3cwk

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    #19
  20. Blue Velvet Moderator emeritus

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    #20
    Check your local bridges here and if you think there's a problem, then share it with your local friends and family and write a letter (don't email) to your representatives and local papers to get something done.
     
  21. ugahairydawgs macrumors 68020

    ugahairydawgs

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    #21
    LOL at the notion that a single party is the source of all the problems in this country. There are two chambers of Congress and each are controlled by a different party. Hard to blame it on one in particular when that is the case.

    And speaking of our kids.....I'm sure they are going to love all of this debt we are piling up for them as well.
     
  22. DUCKofD3ATH Suspended

    DUCKofD3ATH

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Location:
    Universe 0 Timeline
    #22
    If people can't be bothered to learn English without picking the taxpayers's pockets, let them go back where they came from.

    As for the military: peace is expensive. Maintaining Pax Americana costs a lot of money, but far less than fighting WWIII.

    Which isn't to say that cutting waste from defense shouldn't be a priority. But government is incapable of such cutting, because it reduces said government's power over the governed.

    And that's why the default reaction of any government when forced to reduce spending is to slash programs that directly benefit taxpayers.
     
  23. G51989, May 24, 2013
    Last edited: May 24, 2013

    G51989 macrumors 68030

    G51989

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Location:
    NYC NY/Pittsburgh PA
    #23
    I'm sure they'll be thankful that we spent money on meaningless wars, corperate welfare, subsidizing tax cuts for the rich, bailing out banks and big business.

    And that will make them feel good that we didn't spend money on infrastructure, they won't mind falling bridges, crumbling roads, crumbling schools, failing water and power systems. Nope, they'll be fine. While they're kids boil drinking water and study by candle light during rolling blackouts
     
  24. mcrain macrumors 68000

    mcrain

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2002
    Location:
    Illinois
    #24
    Simple solution. Raise taxes sufficiently to pay for what we've spent, what we need to spend, and what is necessary for the economy to grow.

    Simple, but there is ONE party that won't let us.
     
  25. macquariumguy macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2002
    Location:
    Sarasota FL
    #25
    Thankfully.
     

Share This Page