Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster


Carrier-financed iPhones purchased from Apple will soon be locked to the carrier, ending a workaround customers used to purchase an unlocked iPhone on a payment plan.

iphone-17-cyber.jpg

Until the rule change, buying an iPhone from Apple and opting for financing through Verizon or T-Mobile meant you would get an iPhone not locked to either carrier's network. That's no longer the case, and now iPhones financed through Verizon or T-Mobile will not be able to be used with a different network. AT&T-financed smartphones were always locked to the AT&T network.

Apple's new policy was highlighted on Reddit after a user saw a new "Will my iPhone be unlocked?" FAQ item.
In most cases, yes. An iPhone purchased from Apple is unlocked. Once your new iPhone is activated, it remains unlocked, which means you can use it with any carrier that provides service for iPhone. However, if you choose to finance an iPhone through the AT&T Installment Plan, T-Mobile Equipment Installment Plan, or Verizon Device Payment Program, your iPhone will be locked to the carrier until paid in full.
An unlocked smartphone means it can be used with any carrier, while a locked smartphone is limited to the carrier it was purchased through. Locked smartphones can be problematic when traveling internationally, because activating a second eSIM for another network is blocked.

Apple hasn't said why it's making the change, but buyers were able to use carrier trade-ins and promotional discounts to get an unlocked iPhone. Some buyers may have purchased iPhones and sold them off without making the carrier payments, and carrier locking is a standard practice to prevent unpaid devices from being resold.

Apple's checkout process still says iPhones financed through T-Mobile and Verizon are unlocked, so the new policy may not have gone into effect yet.

iPhones purchased outright or with Apple Card Monthly Installments remain unlocked from the time of purchase. When iPhones purchased through carrier plans are paid off, they are unlocked.

Article Link: Apple Closes Unlocked iPhone Loophole for T-Mobile and Verizon Financing
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Z-4195

[…]Apple hasn't said why it's making the change, but buyers were able to use carrier trade-ins and promotional discounts to get an unlocked iPhone. Some buyers may have purchased iPhones and sold them off without making the carrier payments, and carrier locking is a standard practice to prevent unpaid devices from being resold.[…]
Could be this?
 
if i purchase an iphone from apple and use their 24 month interest free payment plan or via Apple's IUP, and choose TMobile as my carrier during the ordering process, will my phone get locked to TMobile?
 
if i purchase an iphone from apple and use their 24 month interest free payment plan or via Apple's IUP, and choose TMobile as my carrier during the ordering process, will my phone get locked to TMobile?

No. As noted in the article, iPhones purchased using Apple financing are unlocked.

The article notes this only happens if your iPhone is financed through the carrier on one of the carrier's installment plans and once the phone is paid off, it can be unlocked.
 
It's 2026. Carrier locking should be illegal.

Not if the phone is subsidized by the carrier. You’re effectively getting a cheaper phone in exchange for committing to that carrier for a defined period of time.

For the record, that’s why I never buy an iPhone from a carrier. I save more by buying it outright than I would with a carrier deal—especially when I travel internationally.

I fully recognize that not everyone can do that, but without carrier locking, there would be little incentive for a carrier to subsidize the purchase price.
 
Even though I don’t buy locked phones and don’t trust carriers as far as I can throw them, unless I am missing something, this actually doesn’t bother me.

If you have your mobile phone carrier buy the phone for you, it makes sense it’d be locked to them until it’s paid off.
 
Not if the phone is subsidized by the carrier. You’re effectively getting a cheaper phone in exchange for committing to that carrier for a defined period of time.

For the record, that’s why I never buy an iPhone from a carrier. I save more by buying it outright than I would with a carrier deal—especially when I travel internationally.

I fully recognize that not everyone can do that, but without carrier locking, there would be little incentive for a carrier to subsidize the purchase price.

I haven't bothered with this for a long time for the same reason I don't buy my computers from my ISP, but back when that was the only option, my real problem with this is what happens when it is paid off.

AT&T at least made it an enormous pain. And I'll never forgive them for withholding updates from their locked version of an Android phone I had at the time.

The thought of these network operators having their claws in my phone is just gross. This was the exact innovation Steve Jobs fought so hard for. The radical concept that the phone was just a computer attached to their network, and the network operator shouldn't control every aspect of it solely to extract profit.
 
Not if the phone is subsidized by the carrier. You’re effectively getting a cheaper phone in exchange for committing to that carrier for a defined period of time.

For the record, that’s why I never buy an iPhone from a carrier. I save more by buying it outright than I would with a carrier deal—especially when I travel internationally.

I fully recognize that not everyone can do that, but without carrier locking, there would be little incentive for a carrier to subsidize the purchase price.
How are you getting a cheaper phone? What is being subsidized? Aren’t those payment plans just the retail price of the phone spread out? I’m not following your math.
 
The thought of these network operators having their claws in my phone is just gross. This was the exact innovation Steve Jobs fought so hard for. The radical concept that the phone was just a computer attached to their network, and the network operator shouldn't control every aspect of it solely to extract profit.

Yeah. I think it’s also part of why they didn’t like SIM cards anymore. (Vs eSIM)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.