Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
As much as I adore the iWatch itself, it can never ever compare to a high end luxury watch. Sorry, it will never. Even if you gold plate the watch it still won't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alexandr
What if it's made with solid gold? Would that help?
The brand and quality of the watch has a legit history and that itself is worth alot of money. But we're talking commodity here so these luxury watches all have a value that is inflated by people. To me the Apple Watch doesn't need to be solid gold but for myself it is a wondrous device. Will it have a value of a Patek Philipe? Absolutely not. It is in the market price of a gadget. If it was made with diamonds that would make the watch way too expensive for what it is.

This is just my opinion of course....but majority of ballers won't wear this Apple Watch if they can wear a luxury watch instead.
 
Only the ones with upper incomes, the ones that make approx $5000 for mowing a neighbor's lawn. And of course we have the dogecoin and meme stock millionaires.
that's a good topic to talk about - we, at least I don't, live in a world of the fancy rich. I can't even FATHOM how they spend their money. Perhaps $5k to mow a lawn a month or even bi-weekly is not expensive to them. Just unfathomable to me. I've seen when that Apple Watch first edition with gold was sold some chinese kid was showing off online how he got his husky doggie THREE of them to wear. Sigh, humanity has no hope.
 
It didn't even really occur to me that the Apple is watch brand in any traditional sense. I consider a watch brand to be Omega, or Hamilton, Patek and Rolex....who make jewelry for the wrist. It's a high end fashion item which happens to tell the time mechanically. You can service these items and it will likely outlast you.

As my above example, buying an Apple watch is like buying a mouse or second monitor when I have a laptop. It's an extension of the phone and an Apple Watch and iPhone go together perfectly. You'd be almost stupid to try to buy another brand of watch instead (maybe Garmin if you are an athlete). To me, the Apple watch is just a peripheral....I get as excited about owning it as I do about buying the latest greatest Logitech Mouse.
 
Anyone who is buying a Rolex is getting them on the grey market - and I doubt those metrics are being counted.

Wait. Why grey market?

Wouldn't you want things as legit as possible with something like a Rolex? Don't you get a certificate with your serial registered in the Rolex system?

I'd be afraid I'd get a counterfeit or something. If I'm paying five or six figures for a watch, I'd make damn sure things are done by the book.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alexandr
I'm sure a lot of teens would choose a Rollie over a watch that requires a reset of the entire device each software update, if they could afford it

But oh SoN1NjA, that's unfair, only the Series 3 has that issue. Well why the **** does it have that issue in the first place??? It's still being sold and that's un-ex****ing-cusable

Also, what does upper income even mean? I come from a middle class family, I own the new 13 Pro Max which I'm sure puts me in some brackets above quite a few, doesn't mean I can afford a multi-thousand dollar watch anytime soon
Anybody who could afford a Rolex is not rocking a Series 3
 
Who cares what upper income teens think? If they are choosing a throw away watch over something with real value, they are unnecessary and irrelevant, and shouldn’t be trusted with anything.
What about a watch doesn't have real value? Rolex watches hold their value like traditional assets. Additionally, do you not understand the point of money? It's to spend after working hard, not a race to see who has the most bags because once you're 6 ft under you don't have a dime. Being smart with money is a good thing to do, but life isn't fun when all of your money is hoarded in an investment portfolio. Did I even mention the part where it's about teenagers? Kids are kids, let them have fun.
 
When I was a teen, all us teens wore Rolex watches. We used to have Rolex parties where we’d get together and synchronize our Rolexes. Manually of course— none of this “automatic” nonsense that rots your brain. If we were a minute or two off we didn’t care because that BUILT CHARACTER. I still proudly wear my Rolex. Maybe I’m old fashioned, but I don’t need to “download” the time. I’ve got my own “processor” for that and it’s between my ears thank you very much!!! These teens today have NO respect for what came before them. No wonder this country is in such trouble.
 
Upper income teens?

Are they earning more per hour at the soda shop or wherever kids work than their peers?

Don't they mean "teens from upper incomes?"
 
When I was young I wore Casio. At 31 I was finally able to afford Rolex. Glad I bought my watches years ago. Today Rolex watches resale for 2-3 the retail price. I've never liked a apple watch. Huge apple fan here and user. Rather still continue to wear my Rolex watches on wrist at my current age of 39. Simple and classy.
 
I love baiting Rolex users, because it's fun. The whole "invest in your watch" targets a specific thought process which I believe is ridiculous, and I'm always amused when I hear members of the public parroting the lines almost verbatim.

The Rolex brand is an aspirational brand, and their schtick is essentially "you've made it."

You don't buy a Rolex because it's a f*cking awesome watch. You buy it because it has a marketing-created aura that you (or your ancestors) got suckered into.

They're like the Bose of luxury watches (double ouch).

i'm a rolex "user" couldn't care less about this 'baiting' you speak of. the point i made in my post(if you saw it) is that this comparison seems to vague to make the conclusion that it does.

and i honestly think people buy rolexes for many different reason, including the one you listed — some because it is, in fact, an awesome watch.

and even if you consider rolex to be the bose of luxury watches, i guess some people still prefer that over koss. :)
At least you get your money’s worth out of Rolex than an Apple Watch, Rolex and brands like Patek phillipe think 100 years ahead in brand relevance, granted the market is shrinking but a perfect example is when the Apple Watch S1 released, did we forget the $17,000 solid gold Apple Watch? So imagine if you had the money to spend the 17k for a So called Apple Watch Edition Especially a series 1 made out of gold back in 2014 looking at it now it’s nothing but a big expensive paperweight compared to a mechanical watch at this rate.

You Can completely flip this script to electronic devices and realize at this rate how much money is wasted on stuff that won’t even work years don’t the road.

With that said though Rolex at this point is playing the whole supply and demand by not even bothering to increasing and demanding exclusivity which is kind of hilarious, this is the NYC Rolex Store

It’s true though Rolex are entry level Swiss watches but they are playing it pretty good and the flippear market ain’t helping it at all
14353637-5857-487B-BBB8-4D37B19E6274.jpeg
 
At least you get your money’s worth out of Rolex than an Apple Watch, Rolex and brands like Patek phillipe think 100 years ahead in brand relevance, granted the market is shrinking but a perfect example is when the Apple Watch S1 released, did we forget the $17,000 solid gold Apple Watch? So imagine if you had the money to spend the 17k for a So called Apple Watch Edition Especially a series 1 made out of gold back in 2014 looking at it now it’s nothing but a big expensive paperweight compared to a mechanical watch at this rate.
see that 17k one i could never understand. yes, it was the first apple watch, but did anyone really expect it to not go obsolete?..

the thing is, i think that rolex and apple watch, in this case — serve completely different purposes. i didn't get the aw to replace my rolex — i wanted to be able to stay connected while i was on the beach — god honest truth :)))
i also find that it motivates me to be more active... regardless, comparing the two doesn't make sense 95% of the time. imho, but still :)
 
see that 17k one i could never understand. yes, it was the first apple watch, but did anyone really expect it to not go obsolete?..

the thing is, i think that rolex and apple watch, in this case — serve completely different purposes. i didn't get the aw to replace my rolex — i wanted to be able to stay connected while i was on the beach — god honest truth :)))
i also find that it motivates me to be more active... regardless, comparing the two doesn't make sense 95% of the time. imho, but still :)
For sure of course, i apreciate both, i for one they serve two different purposes, i use mine at the pool but i prefer to use a sports watch a beach for some reason so I’m backwards! With that said I notice that companies are starting to backdown on having a smartwatch a work anyways but in some cases i don’t like the watch at some points just because i like to disconnect from the phone often a times and just like to look at the time but to each their own!!

I do like to wear the Apple Watch when i am extremely active i guess on during a trip at disney just keep track of how much i walked during the day
 
  • Like
Reactions: alexandr
All the hand-wringing in this thread about teens and Rolexes is hilarious. Of course not many teens own Rolexes, but the survey is about favourite brands, i.e. you can also choose something you don‘t own, but aspire to. If Rolex (and other luxury warches) become less popular with teens, it probably means that less of them will buy one later (when they do have the money). Bad news for mechanicals either way, even if the luxury sector will of course never completely vanish because it‘s about status and vanity and not how useful that bulky shiny thing on your wrist really is.
I assume this is the correct interpretation and that the MacRumors article was poorly-written.

I took a look at the actual report, and it isn’t any less murky. The data are shown under a section called “Favorite Watch Brands,” with a sub-heading “Upper-Income Teens.” In the table Apple and Rolex are 39% and 35%, respectively. However, there is no information on what the actual question(s) were that yielded those results. Was it “Which watch brand would you like to own?” or “Which brand watch do you wear?” or something else?
 
I assume this is the correct interpretation and that the MacRumors article was poorly-written.

I took a look at the actual report, and it isn’t any less murky. The data are shown under a section called “Favorite Watch Brands,” with a sub-heading “Upper-Income Teens.” In the table Apple and Rolex are 39% and 35%, respectively. However, there is no information on what the actual question(s) were that yielded those results. Was it “Which watch brand would you like to own?” or “Which brand watch do you wear?” or something else?
i also appreciate what the aw does for me when i'm away from my computer/phone as far as notifications go. answering and occasional call... but yea — i first considered getting an aw when i was hiking and also needed to check my email for work. until that i had no use for it :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.