Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

DMB15

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jul 30, 2012
8
0
Does anyone know which one is the better way to go to protect your iPhone? Any good or bad experiences?
Thanks for any input....
 

edhawk1965

macrumors member
Mar 15, 2011
59
3
Search in this forum, yesterday I read a pretty good comparison between all the options, the 2 you mentioned plus Squaretrade.
 

maddux2005

macrumors 6502
Jun 7, 2010
417
0
I went with AT&T simply for the lost/stolen feature. $200 deductable is still far better then unsubsidized pricing. Apple care is $99 + $50 deductable for damage and they don't cover lost/stolen. That's $150. AT&T is only $50 more (plus the monthly fee of $7) and also covers lost/stolen.
 

physicsguy13

Contributor
Oct 5, 2010
365
93
Huntiingon Beach, CA
As mentioned above, the one thing that Applecare+ is not going to cover is a lost phone. If this is something that you think might happen, then I would go with insurance. Of course, if you factor in the cost of the insurance and the deductible it is a significant amount.
 

maddux2005

macrumors 6502
Jun 7, 2010
417
0
My problem with apple care is the deductable. Lets say I get it for $99. I drop it. $50 deductable brings me to $150. If I 'chance' it and don't get apple care, and drop my phone....it's $200. So it's a $50 gamble and doesn't cover lost/stolen
 

Captainobvvious

macrumors 6502
Jun 15, 2010
366
2
My problem with apple care is the deductable. Lets say I get it for $99. I drop it. $50 deductable brings me to $150. If I 'chance' it and don't get apple care, and drop my phone....it's $200. So it's a $50 gamble and doesn't cover lost/stolen

Exactly. You pay $100 for the chance to maybe possibly save $50.

If you buy Applecare+ and never need it you lost $100
If you don't buy Applecare+ and you break your phone it cost you $50 more than it would have if you had Applecare+

Unless you KNOW you're going to accidentally break the phone or you think you'll break it twice it isn't worth it.
 

maddux2005

macrumors 6502
Jun 7, 2010
417
0
Exactly :)

That's why the $7 a month is better peace of mind. Small upfront costs and covers lost/stolen
 

jlake02

macrumors 68020
Nov 2, 2008
2,259
1
L.A.
I went with AT&T simply for the lost/stolen feature. $200 deductable is still far better then unsubsidized pricing. Apple care is $99 + $50 deductable for damage and they don't cover lost/stolen. That's $150. AT&T is only $50 more (plus the monthly fee of $7) and also covers lost/stolen.

I did the exact same. :)
 

Primejimbo

macrumors 68040
Aug 10, 2008
3,295
131
Around
Exactly. You pay $100 for the chance to maybe possibly save $50.

If you buy Applecare+ and never need it you lost $100
If you don't buy Applecare+ and you break your phone it cost you $50 more than it would have if you had Applecare+

Unless you KNOW you're going to accidentally break the phone or you think you'll break it twice it isn't worth it.

But you drop it again and that's another $200, Applecare will be $50
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.