AT&T Fined $5.25M for Two 911 Outages that Affected 15,000+ Emergency Calls

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jun 28, 2018.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    AT&T is paying the Federal Communications Commission a $5.25 million fine to settle an investigation into a pair of 2017 outages that blocked over 15,000 people from making 911 calls.

    According to the FCC [PDF], during a five hour outage on March 8, 2017, 12,600 unique users across the United States saw their emergency 911 calls fail, while during a 47 minute outage on May 1, 2017, 2,600 users had 911 calls fail.

    [​IMG]

    The outages, which impacted AT&T's Voice over LTE network used by many modern smartphones, were caused by planned network changes that were implemented on those days that inadvertently interfered with the routing of 911 calls.

    During the March outage, the FCC says that AT&T also failed to "quickly, clearly, and fully notify" affected 911 call centers. These kinds of outages are "unacceptable" and according to the FCC, carriers have a responsibility to both prevent outages and in the event of an outage, notify call centers immediately.
    In addition to paying a $5.25 million fine to end the investigation, AT&T is also required to implement "proactive system changes" to reduce the likelihood and impact of future 911 outages, improve its processes for notifying 911 call centers of future outages, ensure reliable 911 call completion, and file regular compliance reports with the FCC.

    Article Link: AT&T Fined $5.25M for Two 911 Outages that Affected 15,000+ Emergency Calls
     
  2. OldSchoolMacGuy Suspended

    OldSchoolMacGuy

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    #2
    This will make MacRumors members happy until they realize that AT&T will just raise their rates (like this new fee) to make up for the loss.
     
  3. Asarien, Jun 28, 2018
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 29, 2018

    Asarien macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    #3
    So they take it out on their customers by increasing our "administration fee."
     
  4. belvdr macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Location:
    No longer logging into MR
    #4
    Ha, double the fee again! LOL
     
  5. Appurushido macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2012
    #5
    Incoming phantom charges to peoples accounts or they make up some other BS fee increase to cover their legal costs.
     
  6. farewelwilliams macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2014
    #6
    secretly sprinkle random $1 charges in 5.25 million customers' bills
     
  7. B4U macrumors 68000

    B4U

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2012
    Location:
    Undisclosed location
    #7
    Hence the "administrative fee" hike that we just see?
     
  8. KPandian1 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2013
    #8
    That should be $800 million; then it will bring smiles to Macrumors and AT&T folks!
     
  9. lostngone macrumors 65816

    lostngone

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2003
    Location:
    Anchorage
    #9
    Wow! 5 million you say?

    That is bad! That is just above what they keep in the petty cash account!
     
  10. Asarien macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    #10
    I mean... Other than AT&T being Apple's first cellular partner and all... But whatevs.
     
  11. keysofanxiety macrumors G3

    keysofanxiety

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    #11
    In the cookie jar, right? Or was it behind the bookcase? I can never remember.
     
  12. coolfactor macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2002
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC CANADA
    #12
    I'm guessing the fine is directly tied to their *failure* to report the outages immediately, rather than the outages occurring at all. Outages will occur, but as long as they manage it properly, they won't be fined?
     
  13. Relentless Power, Jun 28, 2018
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2018

    Relentless Power macrumors Penryn

    Relentless Power

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    #13
    5.25M is nothing to AT&T. I’m sure they will try to contest the fines if it’s optional. But still, it’s not really a joking matter when it comes to 911 calls that can’t be transferred over to a dispatch center for 15,000+ Emergent calls. Not to mention, any additional law suits that may arise out of this.
     
  14. Aldaris, Jun 28, 2018
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2018

    Aldaris macrumors 68000

    Aldaris

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Location:
    Salt Lake
    #14
  15. macduke macrumors G3

    macduke

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    Location:
    Central U.S.
    #15
    Of course the FCC gets the money instead of the people who were affected by the outage. Did anyone die because of this outage? Seems like there could be a lot of lawsuits since the FCC has basically said they're guilty with this fine.

    $5.25M is chump change to AT&T though. This is just the cost of doing business. It's cheaper for them to provide inadequate services vs. paying these fines. They just bought Time Warner for $85.4 billion. That's $85,400,000,000.00 They don't give one crap about this or you.
     
  16. longofest Editor emeritus

    longofest

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2003
    Location:
    Falls Church, VA
    #16
    Literally on the same day that AT&T raises their rates to net them $800 mil in new revenue.

    Somehow this fine doesn't seem like that much, eh?
     
  17. KGBguy macrumors regular

    KGBguy

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2015
    Location:
    USSR 2.0
    #17
    Sounds about right, our government will never miss an opportunity to extort money from anyone they can.

    PS However, the saddest part about it is that the majority of people here see nothing wrong with it... hence, we have arrived!
     
  18. lostngone macrumors 65816

    lostngone

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2003
    Location:
    Anchorage
    #18
  19. elppa macrumors 68040

    elppa

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    #19
    Doesn't seem like a punishment at all.
    The EU although seems to be the only political body capable of holding organisations to account with proper fines.
     
  20. JPack macrumors 68040

    JPack

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2017
    #20
    The outages were a result of planned network changes.

    Basically, AT&T planned poorly and then didn't let anyone know about the outages.

    Outages should not be occurring.
     
  21. acorntoy, Jun 28, 2018
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2018

    acorntoy macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    May 25, 2010
    #21


    - 15,000 affected, probably some iPhone customers
    -comes right after at&t raised “administrative fees” for millions of customer (including many using iPhones)

    This information might just be useful to iPhone customers when choosing their network provider.
     
  22. fairuz macrumors 68000

    fairuz

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2017
    Location:
    Silicon Valley
    #22
    I've heard of DDoS attacks on 911 using infected Android phones. Wonder if it was from that. But then again I have calls with my family fail all the time, so wouldn't be surprised if they were just being jerks.

    Btw, I know phones are old tech, so if you call someone who's calling you, you'll get the voicemail. But how come not a single calling app besides Facebook Messenger has figured out that if two people call each other, it should connect them instead of saying "unavailable"?
     
  23. Schnegg macrumors member

    Schnegg

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2017
    #23
    Emergency call outages can actually cost lives. This fine seems quite appropriate.
     
  24. supercoolmanchu macrumors regular

    supercoolmanchu

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2012
    Location:
    Hollywood
    #24
  25. garylapointe macrumors 65816

    garylapointe

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2006
    Location:
    Dearborn (Detroit), MI, USA
    #25
    There are sites that focus on those things.

    There is information not posted here that might be useful for iPhone people choosing video services, exercises, traveling, where is the separation?

    Regardless, put it on the iOS page ;)
    It's not Mac, it's not iPad, but it's closer.

    Didn't there used to be a "page 2"? Or did that go away with the Mac/iOS pages?
     

Share This Page