Originally posted by Chaszmyr
Apple may have some trick up their sleeve that allows them to run x86 macs without OSX being able to be installed on a non-mac... I think thats what would be best for Apple, if its possible
Originally posted by wisher
Intro a mid-range single processor Athlon Desktop Mac. 1 PCI slot/ CD-RW only. Make it cheap and fast. Boots MacOS X (x86) and can boot Windows.
On my post in https://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=14107&perpage=25&pagenumber=2 would like to counter your point. It is possible.Originally posted by strider42
Of course thats posisble, thats exactly what they do right now. You can buy other powerPC computers without being able to install Mac OS on them, becaue of the hardware rom, and how the OS is specifically written for the architecture. That part is no problem.
Originally posted by MacCoaster
Buy your $1000 800MHz G4 Amiga workstation...
Amiga. They're taking preorders for a true PowerPC 7451 powered 800MHz motherboard that is standard ATX.Originally posted by agreenster
Do you mean Avid?
No, I'm not talking about Linux on a Mac, in fact, the opposite. Mac-on-Linux is a "virtual" Macintosh emulator (emulates Apple ROMs, whatever needed to boot Mac OS) but uses the current PowerPC processor to power the Mac OS X running under Linux.Originally posted by MrMacman
Isn't there a better mac-linux conversion?
Last time I checked (about 4 seconds ago) there was THIS
lol, or are you talking about something else...?
whatever.
If apple goes XP and other processors that is a good thing cause everything will run better.
Apple needs to spread out, not thin itself but increase market share and everything.
Originally posted by Thirteenva
Of course the user experience as a whole is lacking on windows and multitasking(which is an absolute must for me, i have at least 5 high powered graphics and web design programs open at once) is a joke on the pc.
Didn't catch your post here, but I'll comment on the multitasking thing.Originally posted by Thirteenva
Of course the user experience as a whole is lacking on windows and multitasking(which is an absolute must for me, i have at least 5 high powered graphics and web design programs open at once) is a joke on the pc.
And all Mac users used A/UX. A/UX never got popular, they still used Mac System Software 7.x for your regular Joe. Windows NT was just fine for your regular Joe and they had it since 1993. It wasn't until Mac OS X that Apple produced a true multitasking environment for your regular Joe.Originally posted by gopher
Actually Apple had A/UX, a true multitasking environment before Windows NT. 1992 according to this link here:
http://www.applefritter.com/ui/aux/
Funny how Window NT wasn't really forced onto the average Joe until Window XP.Originally posted by MacCoaster
And all Mac users used A/UX. A/UX never got popular, they still used Mac System Software 7.x for your regular Joe. Windows NT was just fine for your regular Joe and they had it since 1993. It wasn't until Mac OS X that Apple produced a true multitasking environment for your regular Joe.
I apologize for not making this point clear in my post.
That's subjuctive.Originally posted by Sun Baked
Funny how Window NT wasn't really forced onto the average Joe until Window XP.