Best way to manage photos for a semi-pro

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by mac mac mac, Dec 28, 2009.

  1. mac mac mac macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2008
    Location:
    Bellevue, WA
    #1
    Hi,

    I just bought the Canon Rebel T1i last month and I'm loving it so far. I have been using iPhoto, and I really like how you can manage all of your photos in one place and all the other extras (e.g. faces, places, facebook, etc).

    Since I'll be shooting in RAW with the new camera, I'm planning to move over to either Aperture or Lightroom. I'm using the trial version of Aperture and Lightroom 3 Beta now. Do you know what's the best way to manage my photo library? Is there a way to manage all of my photos in one place, and be able to easily upload my pictures to Facebook or face detection?

    I know in Aperture I can import photos from my iPhoto library, and either copy over the the Aperture library or leave it in its current location without re-importing again. If I leave it in its current location, where are the modified files stored? Do most of you maintain more than just one library (eg 1 for iphoto, one for Aperture)? Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
     
  2. TuffLuffJimmy macrumors G3

    TuffLuffJimmy

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #2
    I'd wait until Aperture 3 (or X, whatever it's called) or I'd go with LightRoom. I, personally, am an Aperture user, but there aren't that big of differences between the two.

    I use iPhoto for family events and parties (which I shoot in jpeg), and Aperture for my photography (which I shoot RAW).
     
  3. Nostromo macrumors 65816

    Nostromo

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Location:
    Deep Space
    #3
    Question is if you need a catalog.

    You can also get Capture One and use a speedy browser with search feature. Photo Mechanic is very popular.

    If you buy Photoshop, Bridge CS4 is a good application to work with.

    Lightroom does only work with Adobe Camera RAW. If you want to ever use a different RAW processor (like Capture One, DxO) you are effed.

    I own Expression Media as a catalogue software, but it's complicated, it's by Microsoft (who bought the former iView Media Pro), and it's no longer supported.

    If you are just starting out, I'd try out a few RAW processors (Capture One, DxO) and try out Photo Mechanic, and get Photoshop with CS4 (if you haven't already got it).
     
  4. Jaro65 macrumors 68040

    Jaro65

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    #4
    Since you have a Canon product, didn't it also come with CameraWindow and ImageBrowser applications? You should be able to automatically upload photos from your camera onto your Mac and have an associated (date stamped) directory created as part of that process. From there you can import to Aperture or to Lightroom. I have both, but have been mostly using Lightroom lately.
     
  5. TuffLuffJimmy macrumors G3

    TuffLuffJimmy

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #5
    You can do all of that with LightRoom and Aperture while skipping the Canon applications. Or you can let the applications manage your photos in their own libraries.
     
  6. Nostromo macrumors 65816

    Nostromo

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Location:
    Deep Space
    #6
    Sorry, but Image Browser sucks big time. Very low display quality of the shots.
     
  7. seedster2 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2007
    Location:
    NYC
    #7
    Lightroom is what I'd recommend. Many use it in conjunction with photomechanic.
     
  8. Razeus macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
  9. sarge macrumors 6502a

    sarge

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2003
    Location:
    Brooklyn
    #9
    I second that Lightroom reccommendation.

    I tried to get away w/using Bridge and purchased LR for the RAW converter as much as anything. I could have bought Phase One or some such but I wouldn't have benefited from the cataloging capabilities of LR.

    As others will tell you, you can test drive both of these apps (about a month if I recall) to get an idea of what will work best for you. I recently moved all my media to another hard drive and it came off w/o a hitch with all my catalogs intact. I now think of this software as essential and can't imagine working w/o it -it aleviates a lot of the frustration of managing your images.


    EDIT:
    There is a publishing tab which you can upload to flickr, etc., but Aperture may have the edge here..

    Good luck whatever you decide
     
  10. Winni macrumors 68030

    Winni

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Location:
    Germany.
    #10
    Aperture 2. There is no competition. I just don't like the way Lightroom works. Or, more precisely, how Lightroom wants -- me -- to work. Aperture feels more natural to me. For me, Aperture is -- the -- killer application for OS X. I'd probably have dumped the Mac a year or two ago if it wasn't for Aperture.
     
  11. Nostromo macrumors 65816

    Nostromo

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Location:
    Deep Space
    #11
    This is simply not true.

    There are two big drawbacks with Lightroom.

    1. You can only use Camera RAW

    2. You will never be able to use another RAW processor and have the images in your library. You'll be stuck with Lightroom.

    Should you decide to move to another DAM software later (Photo Mechanic is coming out with a full fledged one), then you lose all your catalog data. Even if you used something outdated like Expression Media, you could at least export the catalog data.
     
  12. Nostromo macrumors 65816

    Nostromo

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Location:
    Deep Space
    #12
    Lightroom is, in itself, an excellent DAM software. No need to buy Photo Mechanic (which is expensive, about 170 $).
     
  13. Nostromo macrumors 65816

    Nostromo

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Location:
    Deep Space
    #13
    To the OP:

    Check out RAW converters first, then only choose your DAM software (if at all you need one. A good image browser like Photo Mechanic or Bridge would be enough for most).
     
  14. Kronie macrumors 6502a

    Kronie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2008
    #14
    Lightroom or Aperture. Preferences vary. I use Lightroom.

    Aperture doubles your library size by making a duplicate in its own aperture file, just like itunes and iphoto. I didn't see a walk around for this in my limited use.
     
  15. TuffLuffJimmy macrumors G3

    TuffLuffJimmy

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #15
    The easy "walk around" is to delete the files that it imported since there's no reason in having two of the same file, or ask Aperture to not import the files in its library and you can manage them yourself. Just like in iPhoto and iTunes.

    That's a user error, not an Aperture drawback.
     
  16. Jaro65 macrumors 68040

    Jaro65

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    #16
    Is this really the case? As I recall you can select in Aperture to use the files in their original destination, as compared to creating the Aperture Library and moving all imported photos there as well.
     
  17. Jaro65 macrumors 68040

    Jaro65

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    #17
    Apparently you managed to hit the 'Enter' key before I did. :)
     
  18. TuffLuffJimmy macrumors G3

    TuffLuffJimmy

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #18
    No, it is not the case. Please Kronie, don't spread misinformation. That causes a lot of confusion and when that confusion is around "where do I spend $200?" that just plain sucks.
     
  19. Jaro65 macrumors 68040

    Jaro65

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    #19
    This is just like another Mac vs PC discussions. I have both Aperture and Lightroom and they're both excellent applications. They both offer basically the same functionality, though using a different workflow. No clear winners here. The choice depends on your personal preferences. Having said that, the Lightroom does support more camera formats, which was my main reason for getting it.
     
  20. Razeus macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    #20
    If you plan on sticking with using the superior and unparalleled Lightroom, you would have not a need to export such data.

    Why go with Aperture? It doesn't get the proper resources, updates, plug ins, community, how to videos and integration with Photoshop like Lightroom 2 does. That alone makes LR the better choice.
     
  21. TuffLuffJimmy macrumors G3

    TuffLuffJimmy

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #21
    That's awful shortsighted. What if Adobe slows development of LR, or another developer leapfrogs over LR?

    Perhaps because you prefer the workflow. :rolleyes:
     
  22. dazey macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2005
    #22
    I am an aperture user and recommend you go with aperture or lightroom but suggest you take a long look at lightroom. I am considering changing (which is a big shift when you have a large library). I don't feel that Apple provides adequate support for aperture and camera updates are too slow while adobe gets them out a lot faster.
     
  23. Nostromo macrumors 65816

    Nostromo

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    Location:
    Deep Space
    #23
    Of course, if you know you're going to stick with it.

    But RAW processing only matured a few years back.

    A lot of new developments are still in the pipeline. Localized editing has started in Lightroom, Bibble, and Capture One Pro, and who knows if parametric editing will push Photoshop's pixel editing off the table?

    It also depends on your needs as a photographer. I shoot mostly people, and for me Capture One delivers the best skin tones.

    Who knows what who will take the lead five, ten years from now?

    Some people also like metadata writting into sidecar files, while Lightroom stores all editing instructions in the database. Some people like it, some don't. And who knows what will be standard in ten years?

    Choice of software: there are also many fans of DxO. It's also a great piece of software.

    It's all about your preferences. It's good to have the facts and then decide on what you want to do.
     
  24. Kronie macrumors 6502a

    Kronie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2008
    #24
    I didn't say there wasn't a solution only that I didn't find one. What I said was accurate to my limited use of the product.
     
  25. TuffLuffJimmy macrumors G3

    TuffLuffJimmy

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #25
    Which is inaccurate for someone looking to buy the products. If you don't have any real experience with a product then it's bad to spread issues you think you've found, but haven't checked out.
     

Share This Page