And here's why: It's inexplicable why a mac rumors site chooses despite mine, and others, numerous complains about it to allow a person here to sport a nick of a gay porn star, a disreputable drug addict and self confessed sex maniac, namely Aiden Shaw (with the forum's nickname being AidenShaw). The same forum member is also allowed to sport a signature about gay marriage, and a link too, to some propagandising site about it. What is more, this guy seems to be registered here from 2003. He 's always obnoxious and loud, and with a very vocal pro microsoft attitude and seems to be immune to any criticism left right and center, whilst macrumors is quick to spread bans left right and center, as I am sure all of you mature posters here know, for things that in other forums go unnoticed. But somehow they got all the patience in the world for a gay porn star nick name...it seems american teenagers worldwide will have to be subjected to Aiden Shaw and his sly sexual politics up until at least 2013. Can someone here explain to me how come I ve not seen any JennaJameson nicks around but I have to suffer through a gay porn star nick? Can someone explain to me how on earth signatures are places to link about gay issues? I got nothing against gay people, I love em, my best pals are gay, but they dont go in forums with teenagers sporting porn star nicks and signatures about gay marriage. They have some class and respect unlike said forum member and, evidently, the moderators here. All said and done, and being a poster from Appleinsider who recently crossed over here, I wont be visiting these forums much or participating in such a spirit. Forgive me but I am the Jenna Jameson six pack of beers kind of slob and find male intercourse references in nick names and sigs in very, very bad taste. That said because there are a lot of vulnerable adolescents here I felt I had to put my point across from the sake of protecting them from the sly sexual predatory behaviour of adults. Have your eyes and ears open boys and gals because some people here while say seemingly making an "argument" about windows 7 might actually be promoting their sexual lifestyle in subtle and not so subtle ways. Now roast me all you want, ban me, whatever, it's a sad state of affairs that the forums are in moderating-wise with such a showcase of tactlessness, so no amount of negative response will surprise me. On the contrary I expect it. I for that matter won't even bother replying here. I said what I had to say fair and square, so anyone can come here and distort my views and convince us how great it is to have gay porn stars for nicks and sexual politics, gay again, for signatures.