http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/08/politics/bill-clinton-sanders-supporters-attacks/ Pundits backing various candidates and opponents lashing out isn't exactly new, so what if there should be a better way to debate issues? Critics lash, pundits lash, opponents lash... it's like a licorice factory where the flavor is "sour skunk". It stops selling after a while, the taste stops remaining palatable, and we all get a taste of it and not always realize it. ...And, of course, not all supporters are going to be rabid... or all the time either. Didn't Sanders want a positive and clean campaign anyway? Maybe his own followers could follow the lead or take it and set the perfect example?