Blame Obama (First Budget Surplus in 42 months)

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by Sedulous, May 10, 2012.

  1. Sedulous macrumors 68000

    Sedulous

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2002
    #1
    It looks like the GOP will have to find a way to blame Obama for the first budget surplus in 42 months. It is only a matter of time until they say this is proof that taxes should be cut.

    link
     
  2. CorvusCamenarum macrumors 65816

    CorvusCamenarum

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2004
    Location:
    Birmingham, AL
    #2
    Seems more of an expected blip than anything else.
     
  3. Sedulous thread starter macrumors 68000

    Sedulous

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2002
    #3
    It is an election year. Everything will get spun.
     
  4. thewitt macrumors 68020

    thewitt

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2011
    #4
    This is all smoke and mirrors. There is no surplus. It's all accounting tricks.
     
  5. ericrwalker macrumors 68030

    ericrwalker

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2008
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    #5
    Good point it's an election year. Cook the books to make it look like you have a budget surplus until after the election.
     
  6. leekohler macrumors G5

    leekohler

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Location:
    Chicago, Illinois
    #6
    Proof please. Or are we just supposed to believe this because you say so?
     
  7. ericrwalker macrumors 68030

    ericrwalker

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2008
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    #7
    Proof will be available when it's too late.
     
  8. Raid macrumors 68020

    Raid

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Location:
    Toronto
    #8
    While I don't think accounting 'tricks' are involved, one months surplus doesn't mean anything is getting better; it's just a positive sign.

    What's more worrisome is that the situation is so bad the reports of government monthly expenses make the news. What would be even more dangerous would be to use this surplus as an excuse for the US to slow/stop cuts or the increase of taxes.
     
  9. Zombie Acorn macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #9
    Regardless of whether this is accounting tricks, normal, etc. One should ask why government is not spending the money more efficiently while the economy is still on the lurch.
     
  10. ericrwalker macrumors 68030

    ericrwalker

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2008
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    #10
    Good point, when the government wants to spend money more efficiently they create a whole new agency to cut budgets and create better spending plans. The problem is that the new agency cost more than the savings in general.
     
  11. jnpy!$4g3cwk macrumors 65816

    jnpy!$4g3cwk

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    #11
    So, let's be clear about this. There has been an uptick in the economy and tax revenue (in a good year, you expect people to owe/pay more taxes right now).

    Bottom line: are you happy the economy is improving, or, not?
     
  12. ericrwalker, May 11, 2012
    Last edited: May 11, 2012

    ericrwalker macrumors 68030

    ericrwalker

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2008
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    #12
    I will be happy when the economy starts to improve.

    EDIT: or when these numbers start moving backwards I will be happy. http://www.usdebtclock.org/
     
  13. Queen of Spades macrumors 68030

    Queen of Spades

    Joined:
    May 9, 2008
    Location:
    The Iron Throne
    #13
    Crazy that some people would rather see Obama fail than the economy improve.
     
  14. ericrwalker macrumors 68030

    ericrwalker

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2008
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    #14
    Actually, everyone wants to see the economy improve. Just some of us see his agenda has harmful to the economy. So his agenda failing is the same as the economy improving.
     
  15. mcrain macrumors 68000

    mcrain

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2002
    Location:
    Illinois
    #15
    The debt numbers did start going backwards, then people elected GWB who enacted EXACTLY the type of policies that Romney is advocating.

    The economy started improving within a few months of the current President being inaugurated. Can you imagine how much better off we would be today if the Republicans didn't block everything he tried.

    By the way, next time you hear Romney talk about Obama's "failed" policies, ask yourself, what policies they are talking about. They are responsible for a lack of action on many, many things, so you have to wonder, what things did he take action on that are failed?

    The auto bailout worked. Healthcare Reform hasn't caused the economy to stall, and millions of people are already using it reducing the overall cost of healthcare in the US. In addition, every estimate I have seen has overturning healthcare costing the US billions, while keeping it saves billions. We are less dependant on foreign energy; we are finally enforcing our rights to oil and gas royalties; taxes are still at GWB-GOP levels.

    What is the GOP responsible for? Lowering of credit rating. Blocking jobs bills, debt negotiations, basically everything else.

    If Obama's policies are failing, it isn't because they don't work, but because they haven't been enacted. If the GOP wanted to run on his policies being bad, they should have let them come to the floor of the Senate for votes, and touted any failures there, then touted any failures after being enacted.

    The fear they had was that success would doom them, and their main goal has always been to defeat Obama.
     

Share This Page