I like Williams generally. If you believe the current reports, he saved the Watch from Ive's fashion-focused vision. The Watch itself is interesting tech, but things like HealthKit and some of the APIs dealing with data and studies are a big deal. This is the kind of stuff most people forget about when they need to stop here and complain about the headphone for the umpteenth time since the iPhone 7 was released—or maybe just drop a "courage" joke.
I think there is entirely too much "product vs operations" talk on how these guys work in a greater system. The fact of the matter is that you need both and as long as the guy at the top understands his own strengths versus where he needs to lean on others then you're in good shape as an organization.
Steve Jobs was so talented in some ways it made up for the fact that he was completely awful in other ways. I think the nostalgia factor and revisionist history around Jobs around here is silly though. This is the same guy who tried to tell all of us the the hockey puck mouse was a really nice—and who designed it? Pretty sure that was Ive. 10 years after it's "obvious" removing the legacy ports on the iMac seems forward-thinking, but in the thick of it there was whining about floppy disks akin to the griping about USB-A ports (and optical drives went through the same thing, "Why does Steve Jobs hate Blu-ray!? I want Blu-ray in my MacBook Pro!.").
The man possessed what is/was known industry-wide as the "reality distortion field." He had great showmanship on stage. However, plenty of his steps forward were stumbles that were corrected over time due to consumer demand—App Store for iOS anyone? Remember when web apps were supposed to be good enough for everyone? I mean, if you look at where NeXT was going, you know he was indeed a visionary, but there is no way on earth I would have put up with his antics in the work place. And like all visionaries, they're really wrong a lot of the time.
Ive is about to get the same nostalgia factor. (Heck,
Forstall is getting nostalgia around here at this point and he basically lost to Ive in terms of iOS designs which lead to his departure.)
I find the idea of judging how a guy is going to run a near trillion dollar company by how excited he seems at his keynote presentations to be utterly ridiculous. It's just nitpick nonsense from people who think that if Jobs did something a certain way, it was the right way.
[doublepost=1563831940][/doublepost]
Who here is on team Federighi??!! #hairforceone
Both as a shareholder & an Apple fan- I would absolutely love, love, love to see Craig eventually run the company.
He’s got more personality than Tim, Jeff, Eddy, and Phil.... all put together!!!
Can he though? I mean he's easily my favorite presenter and tends to cover the areas I care most about (e.g. macOS). But I don't know that this at all qualifies him to be the CEO. I said it above, but presentational kills aren't really the most important thing for a CEO. They don't hurt, but the reality is that Apple is entirely too huge to be one man's vision now. Those days were over even before Jobs died.