Campus Police use Pepper Spray on Students

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by fox10078, Apr 4, 2012.

  1. Zombie Acorn macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #2
    Sounds like the protestors forcefully entered the meeting area. It only takes a few to ruin a protest.
     
  2. malman89 macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    May 29, 2011
    Location:
    Michigan
    #3
    While I do agree with that, I feel like the pepper spraying at least jumped a few steps. Why couldn't the campus police just drag those people out of the room? Handcuff them (real or ziptie)? I feel like pepper spray has become the go to tool for when someone is faced with a sticky situation they don't know how to handle.

    I really can't see how a line of a few officers shoving scrawny kids out of the room isn't any less efficient and better.

    I also just love the picture. "Oooh, let me get this on my iPhone!" A phone that costs almost as much as one unsubsidized class or the phone plan associated with it compared to a cheaper alternative costing another unsubsidized class.
     
  3. iJohnHenry macrumors P6

    iJohnHenry

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Location:
    On tenterhooks
    #4
    :eek: Careful there, lest you have a mob form on your doorstep.

    An iPhone is an entitlement, don't you know? :p
     
  4. Tomorrow macrumors 604

    Tomorrow

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    Location:
    Always a day away
    #5
    Sounds like this is exactly the sort of thing pepper spray was designed to be used for.

    The article says there were over 100 people, and they stormed the meeting room. How many police would it have taken to "just drag those people out of the room"?

    They got bumrushed. They responded appropriately, IMO.
     
  5. citizenzen macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    #6
    Spraying into a crowd of people inside a building?

    That sounds like an excellent way of hitting bystanders and affecting the breathing of many people in the room.

    I'd be surprised if the meeting continued after that.

    So it would seem to me that pepper spray was not an effective solution in this case.
     
  6. Tomorrow macrumors 604

    Tomorrow

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    Location:
    Always a day away
    #7
    More effective than allowing a hundred unruly protesters to storm an organized meeting.
     
  7. citizenzen macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    #8
    You don't know that was going to happen.
     
  8. Tomorrow macrumors 604

    Tomorrow

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    Location:
    Always a day away
    #9
    It had already happened, according to the article:

    Emphasis mine, naturally.
     
  9. Zombie Acorn macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #10
    Id say this is more of a black mark on the college because its supposed to be an institution of higher learning and yet the students attending don't even know how to hold a lawful protest. The school would be good to expel anyone who was found to be actively entering the meeting area unlawfully, maybe their parents can teach them some manners when they are back home working at mcdonalds.
     
  10. citizenzen macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    #11
    You said ...

    Your quoted article states ...

    Here is the key point ...

    I'm suggesting that your statement of "a hundred unruly protesters to storm[ing] an organized meeting." is an overstatement of what actually occurred.
     
  11. malman89 macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    May 29, 2011
    Location:
    Michigan
    #12
    I dropped my HTC Droid Eris from Verizon last year (when I was a senior in college) for a LG Optimus V from Virgin Mobile to save $50/month. Just pure profit now. Love it.

    Beat me to it. Only said some, which based on those that went to the hospital (just a few) sounds like perhaps a handful actually got in and were being disruptive. A few officers could've really handled that better. If it actually was 100 students mad rushing the trustees in a frenzy, then spray away.
     
  12. Tomorrow macrumors 604

    Tomorrow

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    Location:
    Always a day away
    #13
    Okay, so how many people need to behave this way before pepper spray becomes an option? Does it really need to be all 100? How about 99?

    As fat as I'm concerned, even if it was one person, you have no idea what that person's intent is when they force their way past security. That person could be armed for all you know. I'd someone needs to be stopped to maintain order, you stop them.

    In any event, it sounds like the number of people who needed to be controlled was at least more than the police were able to control by simply asking them to play nicely. I have no problem with their using the pepper spray under the circumstances.
     
  13. Andeavor macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    #14
    People need to learn if they overstep the boundaries (and break the local law) they need to face the consequences - even if it's full of pepper spray.
     
  14. lewis82 macrumors 68000

    lewis82

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2009
    Location:
    Totalitarian Republic of Northlandia
    #15

    "In Stage six (universal ethical principles driven), moral reasoning is based on abstract reasoning using universal ethical principles. Laws are valid only insofar as they are grounded in justice, and a commitment to justice carries with it an obligation to disobey unjust laws. Legal rights are unnecessary, as social contracts are not essential for deontic moral action. Decisions are not reached hypothetically in a conditional way but rather categorically in an absolute way, as in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. This involves an individual imagining what they would do in another’s shoes, if they believed what that other person imagines to be true. The resulting consensus is the action taken. In this way action is never a means but always an end in itself; the individual acts because it is right, and not because it is instrumental, expected, legal, or previously agreed upon. Although Kohlberg insisted that stage six exists, he found it difficult to identify individuals who consistently operated at that level."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Kohlberg's_stages_of_moral_development#Post-Conventional

    TL;DR: The most advanced stages of moral development are based on morality of actions rather than on legality. Unfortunately lots of people don't reach this stage.
     
  15. Tomorrow macrumors 604

    Tomorrow

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    Location:
    Always a day away
    #16
    So you're suggesting that since limiting the number of people in a room is a dumb rule, it's our obligation to defy it?
     
  16. iJohnHenry macrumors P6

    iJohnHenry

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Location:
    On tenterhooks
    #17
    What about the fire code?

    Well, I guess every activity involving more than 1 person will have to be on surveillance video.

    I can't see any other solution to this "they said/they said" ****.
     
  17. Zombie Acorn macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #18
    I'm struggling to link these two also, it can't be about the tuition itself as they are not legally bound to pay unless they want to attend college. Surely the poster isn't suggesting people should be able to break into public spaces whenever they choose, and no laws were being created here that bound these students so obstructing the meeting doesn't seem to meet these standards.
     
  18. lewis82 macrumors 68000

    lewis82

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2009
    Location:
    Totalitarian Republic of Northlandia
    #19
    It's not about it being dumb. Let me give you a real life example.

    In Québec there is currently a massive student strike. In one particular school, one person has gone to court in order to declare the strike illegal and won since there had been some minor procedure irregularities in the referendum (but still, student support was 70%). Students then decided to block the school's hallways with chairs and desks. Sure it was breaking the rules, but the action was moral (the court order, when you evaluate it from a rational point of view, isn't acceptable).
     
  19. kavika411 macrumors 6502a

    kavika411

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Location:
    Alabama
    #20
    I don't think I'm too off-topic when I ask this: I'm curious, in the "rational point of view" world to which you subscribe," what role, if any, is there for purely procedural rules? I don't ask in a snarky or rhetorical way. Just interested, because your paragraph suggests that punishment (for lack of a better word) for violation of a procedural rule/law deems all manner of future action by the violator(s) to be "moral."
     
  20. iJohnHenry macrumors P6

    iJohnHenry

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Location:
    On tenterhooks
    #21
    Let me help you with that. "Just" trumps "law". Better. ;)
     
  21. kavika411 macrumors 6502a

    kavika411

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Location:
    Alabama
    #22
    Didn't need the help, but thanks.
     
  22. Tomorrow macrumors 604

    Tomorrow

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    Location:
    Always a day away
    #23
    You didn't answer my question. Are you advocating that it's okay (indeed, more "advanced" thinking) to break the law, in this case causing trouble and endangering people's lives by blocking off exits, because you feel like the law being broken has less of a moral standing?
     
  23. citizenzen macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    #24
    It's an admittedly tough call. However, when you're in an enclosed space (indoors) it seems to me that you're putting other people and the event itself at risk by using it.

    I would be curious to find out if the meeting was adjourned after the spray was discharged. I imagine that just the smell of it would be enough to bother people, especially those with breathing problems or other sensitivities.

    It would seem to me that the first thing to reach for is your walkie-talkie to call in reinforcements, preferably before the crowd gets out of hand. Using pepper spray jeopardizes the very event you're trying to protect, it leads to bad publicity and PR, and it probably will lead to litigation. It should be used judiciously.
     
  24. localoid macrumors 68020

    localoid

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Location:
    America's Third World
    #25
    Once the heat ray* is deployed the problem of affecting the ones you're trying to protect will be solved...



    *Active Denial System (ADS)

     

Share This Page