Can anything short of military intervention "Save Darfur"?

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by kavika411, Jun 6, 2008.

  1. kavika411 macrumors 6502a

    kavika411

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Location:
    Alabama
  2. skunk macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
  3. kavika411 thread starter macrumors 6502a

    kavika411

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2006
    Location:
    Alabama
    #3
    Like your honesty.
     
  4. scotthayes macrumors 68000

    scotthayes

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2007
    Location:
    Birmingham, England
    #4
    I'm a bit more of an optimist, but it is going to take a huge military force and for that to happen a lot of world leaders have got to wake up to the problem.
     
  5. Badandy macrumors 68040

    Badandy

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2005
    Location:
    Terminus
    #5
    But...but....isn't the UN so effectual?
     
  6. takao macrumors 68040

    takao

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2003
    Location:
    Dornbirn (Austria)
    #6
    what he UN says is irrelevant as long as the UN Security Council lead by the big 5 permanent members doesn't want anything to happen
     
  7. solvs macrumors 603

    solvs

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Location:
    LaLaLand, CA
    #7
    I don't remember anyone saying it was, especially without some of us leading them.
     

Share This Page