child porn: fighting fire with fire

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by Sydde, Jul 9, 2014.

  1. Sydde macrumors 68020

    Sydde

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    #1
    So this is kind of creepy

    Seems to me as though what they want to do is effectively create child pornography in order to fight child pornography – which appears to have been a private communication between two kids, not some kind of scheme to distribute illegal porn. To me, this looks just crazy.
     
  2. jkcerda macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
  3. Hugh macrumors 6502a

    Hugh

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2003
    Location:
    Erie, PA
    #3
    I'm totaled confused here. He's accused of filming himself do some sex act and it was sent to his girl friend, and they want to film him with a erection to prove what? Something is totally messed up here. :rolleyes:

    If the do this, it's nothing a big deal to go though, with out giving you too much info. The injection it's self is nothing, just a little pinch. What hurts is the with drug they use, if the use the drug that is for sure to work. Well that gives you a stiffy, but it hurts, at least it did for me. :confused:

    Hugh
     
  4. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #4
    ****ing ridiculous. And what 17 year old needs anything other than a soft breeze to get a boner?
     
  5. Southern Dad macrumors 65816

    Southern Dad

    Joined:
    May 23, 2010
    Location:
    Shady Dale, Georgia
    #5
    Wait, there's an injection that will cause an erection?
     
  6. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #6

    News to me. I always believed erections led to injections.
     
  7. Southern Dad macrumors 65816

    Southern Dad

    Joined:
    May 23, 2010
    Location:
    Shady Dale, Georgia
    #7
    If it lasts more than four hours...
     
  8. impulse462 macrumors 68000

    impulse462

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2009
    #8
    Erections are caused by a build-up of a compound called cGMP in the muscle layers in the penis. I'm assuming the injection would contain that in order to cause an erection. Just based off my memory from my endocrinology class I took last semester.
     
  9. samiwas macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    #9
    Hell, I'm 39 and I don't even need a soft breeze! :p
     
  10. TheAppleFairy macrumors 68020

    TheAppleFairy

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Location:
    The Clinton Archipelago unfortunately
    #10
    The kid is 17, there are much easier ways to give the kid an erection. Hell when I was 17, it seemed like it if it was 1 minute before class was out an erection of on it's way.


    So are the police going to use some sort of boner recognition software to prove it's his penis?

    So what if it was his penis in the text message? Is it good or bad?

    I am confused, is it ok if it's his penis? Maybe if it's an 18 year old penis and not his 17 year old penis then he won't be brought up on distributing child porn?
     
  11. edk99 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    May 27, 2009
    Location:
    FL
    #11
    I'm guessing they want to prove it is his because if it is then he is 17 and that is child porn. If it turns out to be some dude that is 18 then it is ok i guess.

    It is a great way to ruin your life to be under 18 and send a naked pic of yourself to your GF and get caught. Now you can be lumped in with the 50 year old pervert that molests 8 yr old kids.
     
  12. rhett7660 macrumors G4

    rhett7660

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Location:
    Sunny, Southern California
    #12
    Wow..... man that is all I really have to say about this one. Other than, I am curious about this penis recognition software. Wonder if it is the same one they used on Michael Jackson...! :eek::D
     
  13. TheAppleFairy macrumors 68020

    TheAppleFairy

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Location:
    The Clinton Archipelago unfortunately
    #13
    Yeah, I wonder how this case came about. Did the GF get mad at him or did her parents find out. If I have time I am going check this out later. If the guy waited until his birthday and he was 18 and the GF was still under 18 would they then try to bust him as a child predator? I agree this case is crazy, no charges should be brought against the kid, unless he did it in the past and was asked to stop and continued to send such text, but I wouldn't make it a child pornography charge. If anything, a misdemeanor.
     
  14. colourfastt macrumors 6502a

    colourfastt

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    #14
    You'll never go wrong underestimating the level of stupidity of people.
     
  15. rhett7660 macrumors G4

    rhett7660

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2008
    Location:
    Sunny, Southern California
    #15
    It depends on the state law they are going to use. If you are in California, no, not as a predator. 261.5 PC vs 288 PC. The 261.5 was specifically setup to handle this type of scenario without labeling them as a pedophile. However there are also enhancements since you are now sending lewd pictures of a minor. :eek:

    The whole taking a picture of the boy's genitalia just seems wrong and I am really surprised the judge allowed this.
     
  16. D.T. macrumors G3

    D.T.

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Location:
    Vilano Beach, FL
    #16
    I guess the Manassas City Police need to hire a fluffer.
     
  17. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #17
    The punishment we mete out in this country is ridiculous. We're way too eager to brand someone for life.

    OT: Justin Bieber throws eggs at his neighbor's house and part of his punishment was an $81,000 fine. A West Virginia chemical company poisons the water for 300,00 people and gets an $11,000 fine.
     
  18. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #18
    I agree Bieber's fine was too weak, he should be in prison.:D
     
  19. fridgeymonster3 macrumors 6502

    fridgeymonster3

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2008
    Location:
    Philadelphia
    #19
    From what I've read, the girlfriend is 15 years old, and either she repeatedly told him to stop sending the pictures/videos, or her parents repeatedly told him to stop sending them. Either way, it appears he was warned and when he didn't stop, the police were notified.
     
  20. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #20
    That was quick.


    http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie...WARRANT?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
     
  21. TheAppleFairy macrumors 68020

    TheAppleFairy

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Location:
    The Clinton Archipelago unfortunately
    #21

    Thanks, that makes the story understandable now. It's really unfortunate that it has come to this.
     
  22. zioxide macrumors 603

    zioxide

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    #22
    That's a testament to the absolute failure of the American justice system. Proof that we need to re-examine our system as a whole.

    Two teens sending each other naked pics = bad.

    Court forcing teen to strip naked and be forcibly injected with a drug to produce court sanctioned child pornography = good.

    Only in America.

    Gladly they came to their senses, but the fact that this even was in question is pathetic. This country needs to take a long hard look in the mirror.

    I'm not condoning what the kids did, but kids are stupid and do stupid things. Especially with technology since the older generations have done a piss poor job of educating their kids on the do's and don'ts of technology, partly because many adults don't even understand half of it. Teach the kids it's wrong and that they need to make better choices, and have some ****ing discrection when applying laws instead of just brainlessly trying to lock up every single person we can. This law was designed to protect teens from predators.. not to protect two classmates that are two years apart in age.

    From what I read, the girl was a willing participant and sent photos of herself as well. Probably before her parents found out, then she changed her tune.

    Typical American hypocritical double standards.

    Good that they actually grew brains. Pathetic that it took pressure from the media to do it. This country is in a sad place if **** like this can even happen in the first place.
     
  23. Meister Suspended

    Meister

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2013
    #23
    What judge issues a warrant like that?

    The people who tried to pull this off are clearly insane.

    How are pepople who abuse power like this even allowed to continue?

    And most important: Why is there a county in the USA named after Prince William?
     
  24. Sydde thread starter macrumors 68020

    Sydde

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    #24
    It is named for the Duke of Cumberland, son of King George the Sequel; as opposed to Prince William Sound in Alaska, which was named for the son of Return of the King George. The current next-heir to the throne is the Duke of Cambridge.
     
  25. jkcerda macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #25
    a link would be nice.
     

Share This Page