China to end term limits, sets stage for Xi Jinping to stay in power

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by shinji, Feb 25, 2018.

  1. shinji macrumors 65816

    shinji

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    #1
    https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/25/asia/china-communist-party-xi-jinping-intl/index.html

     
  2. alex2792 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
  3. lostngone macrumors 65816

    lostngone

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2003
    Location:
    Anchorage
    #3
    When was the last time the Chinese government shut down because they didn’t have a budget?
     
  4. nia820 macrumors 68020

    nia820

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    #4
    You can't get serious.
     
  5. 0007776 Suspended

    0007776

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere
    #5
    The Republicans love China, I don’t think they’ve met an authoritarian leader the don’t like in a long time.
     
  6. BeeGood macrumors 68000

    BeeGood

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Location:
    Lot 23E. Somewhere in Georgia.
    #6
    Yeah, I’m sure that’s the reason.
     
  7. Eraserhead macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
  8. skunk macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
  9. AlliFlowers Contributor

    AlliFlowers

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Location:
    L.A. (Lower Alabama)
    #9
    Watch Trump declare what a great idea it is and how the US should do it too.
     
  10. LizKat macrumors 601

    LizKat

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Location:
    Catskill Mountains
    #10
    No wonder Trump has found Xi a copacetic dude when they've met. Trump's been trying to create his own version of state-run media since he took office, he'd love something as well run as what Xi has, and to hear that WH press office sometimes, you'd think he's there already. To the extent the American people will continue to let the President make stuff up on the fly, Trump has already got a leg up towards being able to define unilaterally who we are, what we stand for, how we go about it and who gets to run the show.

    I mean we've already let him stand up there and tell lies about stuff like the size of the crowd at his inauguration, and how many "millions of illegal votes" were cast against him else he'd have won the popular election... what's to keep us from letting him stand up there some day pretty soon and tell us lies about what's in the Constitution?

    And if we rebut him?

    ImpeccableSourceConstitution.jpg


    "Oh that's an old copy of the ACLU version, we'll send out copies of the real one soon."


    An excerpt from a Reuters piece talks about the segue in China towards sanctifying Xi's power, or at least getting as close to that as an officially atheist country gets. I guess a Communist theocracy could end up no more shocking to the world than having an evangelically anointed Pinocchio run a theocracy over here:

    Xi is currently the party’s general secretary, but not chairman. China’s first three leaders after the founding of the People’s Republic in 1949 all carried the title party chairman -Mao Zedong, Hua Guofeng and then Hu Yaobang. It has not been used since.

    “Whether Xi ends up being Party Chairman or just remains Party Secretary doesn’t really matter. What matters is whether he holds onto power,” said Zhang Ming, a professor of political science at Renmin University of China in Beijing.

    “Titles don’t matter as much in China as they do in the West. Here what matters is whether you are the emperor,” he added. “In China, ordinary people already consider Xi Jinping to be the emperor.”

    Mao, the founder of Communist China and still held in god-like awe by many Chinese, died while still Communist Party chairman in 1976, having never retired.

    State media has also increasingly been using the term “lingxiu” to refer to Xi, which means “leader”. Distinct from the standard usage of “lingdao” for leader, “lingxiu” evokes grander, almost spiritual, connotations.

    Mao, for example, was referred to as “lingxiu”, but Xi’s two immediate predecessors, Hu Jintao and Jiang Zemin, were not.

    In a Sunday commentary on its WeChat account, state television said: “The people love the people’s ‘lingxiu’!”, above a picture of Xi being greeted by an adoring crowd in Sichuan province earlier this month.​
     
  11. alex2792 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    #11
    Do you live in China? If not then your opinion holds as much water as mine.
     
  12. BeeGood macrumors 68000

    BeeGood

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Location:
    Lot 23E. Somewhere in Georgia.
    #12
    Here. I’ll help you out.

    http://m.scmp.com/news/china/polici...rights-china-under-xi-jinping-worst-tiananmen

     
  13. ThisBougieLife macrumors 68000

    ThisBougieLife

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2016
    Location:
    SF Bay Area, California
    #13
    Ugh why do countries always have to become dictatorships? First this and then Putin will be re-elected in March. Stupid cyclical history...
     
  14. alex2792 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    #14
    It’s the economy stupid. China’s per capita gdp has increased exponentially under the CCP watch, same with Russia under Putin. Democracy doesn’t put food on the table or pay the bills.
     
  15. BeeGood macrumors 68000

    BeeGood

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Location:
    Lot 23E. Somewhere in Georgia.
    #15
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
     
  16. Eraserhead macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #16
    Russia hasn’t done particularly well under Putin. China certainly has under the modern communist party.

    And democracy has been divided and delivered poor governance.
     
  17. alex2792 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2009
    #17

    Uh, check Russia’s per capita gdp under US puppet Yeltsin and Putin, it’s like 20x increase last time I checked. It’s pretty arrogant to think that our way is the only way to structure society.
     
  18. PracticalMac macrumors 68030

    PracticalMac

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    #18
    We live in world where the powerful get more powerful.

    Opposite of the expectation that free flow of information would limits those powers.

    Romans where right, Gladiatorial fights keep people from complaining about politics.
     
  19. BeeGood macrumors 68000

    BeeGood

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Location:
    Lot 23E. Somewhere in Georgia.
    #19
    Yup. Then it was gladiators. Now it’s the NFL, NBA and MLB.
     
  20. RichardMZhlubb Contributor

    RichardMZhlubb

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2010
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    #20
    It would never happen, but I would support the repeal of the 22nd Amendment. Let the voters decide if a president should get a third term.

    (But Trump would never support it, because it would open the door to Obama running again, and Obama would crush Trump if they ran against each other.)
     
  21. jerwin macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    #21
    The great thing about Monarchies is that the Monarch has absolute freedom to govern as he pleases-- performance metrics be damned!
     
  22. NT1440 macrumors G5

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    #22
    There’s still a massive power structure for him to deal with guys, let’s not jump to the “dictator” label, thus enabling our military which clearly has a fight with China in its roadmap....
     
  23. BeeGood macrumors 68000

    BeeGood

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2013
    Location:
    Lot 23E. Somewhere in Georgia.
    #23
    We’re just calling a spade a spade. The dude is clearly attempting to consolidate power. He has little interest in the rights of the people that he’s governing.

    And I wouldn’t worry about a war. Trump and Xi are besties and no sane person at the pentagon, state department or anywhere else wants to fight China.
     
  24. 0007776 Suspended

    0007776

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere
    #24
    Trump is too old to want or live through 3 terms even if the constitution were to be changed. If he makes it through two terms somehow, I would bet he will push for Ivanka, Kushner, or one of his other kids to take over. After that they could push for the change so they can consolidate power and then remain as president indefinitely.
     
  25. NT1440 macrumors G5

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    #25
    ....your second paragraph shows you have not one inkling of a clue when it comes to our military posture. The nuclear defense review, recent congressional hearings, the Munich security conference, and the aspen security conference all outlined from our military leaders and planners that we’re positioning for war with China.

    As for Ping, your first statement completely disregards the power and cultural dynamics of how the Chinese government operates.

    So yes we can call a spade a spade...if we don’t give a damn what the definition of a spade is.
     

Share This Page

85 February 25, 2018