Clinton campaign chairman: Hillary has 'begun to hate everyday Americans'

zin

macrumors 6502
Original poster
May 5, 2010
488
6,439
United Kingdom
https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4433

On Apr 19, 2015, at 4:20 PM, John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com> wrote:

I know she has begun to hate everyday Americans, but I think we should use it once the first time she says I'm running for president because you and everyday Americans need a champion.
Wow, and this was last year. Unsurprising, however; anybody with a brain can tell she hates ordinary people.
 

ericgtr12

macrumors 65816
Mar 19, 2015
1,237
7,278
Outside of an organization who is only releasing documents on one side of this campaign, who is on record being against Hillary and only Hillary through several written and TV interviews, can anyone actually verify the validity and authenticity of this? Even news outlets verify sources.
 

BoxerGT2.5

macrumors 68000
Jun 4, 2008
1,929
11,072
Every passing day it is becoming more and more apparent that we really have two candidates that don't give a **** about anyone but themselves. It's just a matter of which one will do the least damage in the next 4yrs. Far cry from the optimism many felt 8yrs ago.
 

zin

macrumors 6502
Original poster
May 5, 2010
488
6,439
United Kingdom
Outside of an organization who is only releasing documents on one side of this campaign, who is on record being against Hillary and only Hillary through several written and TV interviews, can anyone actually verify the validity and authenticity of this? Even news outlets verify sources.
10 year record for Wikileaks. No denials. Clinton herself confirmed the authenticity of at least some of them during the debate (by discussing her speech excerpts). Wikileaks documents have in the past been used in court. Compared to Wikileaks, Clinton can't even go 10 minutes without lying, never mind 10 years.

Is it so hard to believe that Clinton isn't the angel you thought she was? Any other sane individual can see right through her ********.

Shoot the messenger...
 

ericgtr12

macrumors 65816
Mar 19, 2015
1,237
7,278
10 year record for Wikileaks. No denials. Clinton herself confirmed the authenticity of at least some of them during the debate (by discussing her speech excerpts). Wikileaks documents have in the past been used in court. Compared to Wikileaks, Clinton can't even go 10 minutes without lying, never mind 10 years.

Is it so hard to believe that Clinton isn't the angel you thought she was? Any other sane individual can see right through her ********.

Shoot the messenger...
They have the same credibility as Breitbart. Hitching your wagons to a single source puts you on the fringe, fact check this and provide real sources and I'm on board that it's reprehensible.
 

yaxomoxay

macrumors 68040
Mar 3, 2010
3,586
24,464
Texas
Outside of an organization who is only releasing documents on one side of this campaign, who is on record being against Hillary and only Hillary through several written and TV interviews, can anyone actually verify the validity and authenticity of this? Even news outlets verify sources.
Wikileaks has an almost perfect track record, it would be crazy of them to produce false information. Assange is still liked because he leaks reliable info, the day that he becomes unreliable he's gone from the face of the Earth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pdqgp and zin

zin

macrumors 6502
Original poster
May 5, 2010
488
6,439
United Kingdom
They have the same credibility as Breitbart. Hitching your wagons to a single source puts you on the fringe, fact check this and provide real sources and I'm on board that it's reprehensible.
LMAO. Wikileaks same league as Breitbart. Way to go ignoring everything I just said.

Of course it's true when they're releasing damaging stuff for your candidate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tgara and yaxomoxay

yaxomoxay

macrumors 68040
Mar 3, 2010
3,586
24,464
Texas
They have the same credibility as Breitbart. Hitching your wagons to a single source puts you on the fringe, fact check this and provide real sources and I'm on board that it's reprehensible.
Come on eric, even you can't believe what you just wrote. Wikileaks is in a completely different league than breitbart (which I don't even like and/or follow).
 

ericgtr12

macrumors 65816
Mar 19, 2015
1,237
7,278
Wikileaks has an almost perfect track record, it would be crazy of them to produce false information. Assange is still liked because he leaks reliable info, the day that he becomes unreliable he's gone from the face of the Earth.
One source, who is in hiding for a rape conviction. You'll need to do better than that.
 

yaxomoxay

macrumors 68040
Mar 3, 2010
3,586
24,464
Texas
One source, who is in hiding for a rape conviction. You'll need to do better than that.
The alleged rape has nothing to do with his job. Nice deflection. Roman Polanski did the same, but I would hard pressed to say that his movies suck...
 
  • Like
Reactions: zin

yaxomoxay

macrumors 68040
Mar 3, 2010
3,586
24,464
Texas
actually, now that I think of it...
where the f- were all the 'pure saints' - especially those from Hollywood - when Roman Polanski was awarded several Oscars for his "The Pianist" after he admitted the brutal rape of a 13yo girl?!
 

ericgtr12

macrumors 65816
Mar 19, 2015
1,237
7,278
The alleged rape has nothing to do with his job. Nice deflection. Roman Polanski did the same, but I would hard pressed to say that his movies suck...
It doesn't matter, he provides exactly zero evidence to back up what he's saying. I know you guys hate the MSM but they have more than one source and are able to back up their news and fact checking. None would EVER go on record without being able to authenticate their statements, particularly with someone as impeachable as Julian Assange.
 

yaxomoxay

macrumors 68040
Mar 3, 2010
3,586
24,464
Texas
It doesn't matter, he provides exactly zero evidence to back up what he's saying. I know you guys hate the MSM but they have more than one source and are able to back up their news and fact checking. None would EVER go on record without being able to authenticate their statements, particularly with someone as impeachable as Julian Assange.
I bet that when they uncovered the Iraq War files you were checking thousand and thousand of sources to validate the data.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zin

thermodynamic

Suspended
May 3, 2009
1,336
1,175
USA
And this is how civil wars are created.

Fitting, since your candidate is the pro-violence choice.
WWPD?

What will pacifists do?

If attacked?

I'd posted some time ago, there was sufficient evidence, even by the UN, Saddam really was trying to fool everyone and people from both major parties agreed. I hadn't read the UN part prior to the day I found it. Will dig it up FWIW...