Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by jkcerda, Dec 7, 2018.
lock her up.
Mark Meadows... RNC... Fox News...
Yeah, put up or shut up. Show the actual proof. Audits. Taxes.
I get it. People don't like Hillary. She's done. But if there was anything to be found, it would have been. The damn president wanted to prosecute her just "because". It's over.
Can you imagine the dirt they'd find if a special counsel were ever appoint to look into the Clinton Crime family? Raids on their attorney offices ect...
How many of those suicides - where the person shot themselves in the back - from 20 feet away - 7 times - would still be suicides?
How many crimes, abuse of power, Russian collusion ect would be found..
This might be more credible if it weren't so lame-duckish.
So you've seen the evidence and know she's guilty? Have at it. But the committee better work fast - they house is about to get cleaned out.
--- Post Merged, Dec 7, 2018 ---
Put the Reynolds wrap down. You'll hurt yourself.
--- Post Merged, Dec 7, 2018 ---
glad you can recognize that the house will overlook whatever Clinton has done.
Glad someone saw the sarcasm.... I had high hopes the Comey image would get that point across...
Why not. The house is currently overlooking everything Trump has done. Why would that change.
"I don't always rip off my dad, cheat on my wives, cheat on my tax returns, create fake schools for profit, lie about the birthplace of a previous president, make things up on the fly, collude with Russia, hire the best people who I whine about and fire, commit obstruction, put my name on anything that will pay me, hire undocumented immigrants and then rally against them for the center of my campaign... but when I do...
I blame Hillary!"
Perhaps the politicians from NC would be better to focus on cleaning up the voting corruption in their own state.
because she is crooked?
And the house overlooking Trump is different how?
you are yet to find anything on trump........................
Oh please. Emoluments alone indicate how corrupt he is. SO MANY conflicts of interest. And he's an un-indicted co-conspirator.
But yeah - completely innocent.
The donor appointments do not provide evidence of any illegal activity, nor are they unprecedented in an administration.
Via your own link
Answer the persons question. There are rules in PRSI.
Rep. Mark Meadows...that says it all. He and his ilk overlook Trump's out in the open criminal behavior (witness tampering, emoluments, obstruction), not to mention his gross ignorance and indecency, but they still cling to their smear campaign against Hillary.
Is this sketchy? Yes.
Should it be investigated? Yes.
Or Trump's obvious violations of the Emoluments Clause of the U.S. Constitution, not to mention how his campaign illegally worked with Russian intelligence agents to hack Clinton's servers, and also use campaign money to pay off a porn star through a catch and kill agreement with the National Enquirer? No. Any one of these should have doomed his administration a year ago.
The attempt to seek some equivalence is ridiculous and transparent. Both candidates in 2016 election can be guilty of crimes.
please point out to the question.
Don't need to imagine when it already happened with Whitewater. Four years.
then jail them BOTH, not sure why guys try to see some "equivalence".......
Not even close to what is going down now.. But I assume you knew that and just wanted to make a bogus point...
ANY administration that appoints people AFTER donations are made should be jailed.
pray/say/tell WHERE have I said the man is innocent? charge him
So you're saying Trump should be in jail? I don't agree with you.. via this point.