CNN cuts ties with Brazile

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by Zombie Acorn, Oct 31, 2016.

  1. Zombie Acorn macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #1
  2. VulchR macrumors 68020

    VulchR

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    #2
    She gave advice about likely questions. Not sure that is such a 'crooked' act. Beside the issue about the water supply was bound to come up.
     
  3. Praxis91 macrumors regular

    Praxis91

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2011
    #3
    They're not denying all the stuff coming out of wikileaks.

    Drain the swamp!
     
  4. MadeTheSwitch macrumors 6502a

    MadeTheSwitch

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    #4
    I'm confused. How did Brazille get the questions in advance if CNN says it didn't give them to her?
     
  5. Zombie Acorn thread starter macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #5
    She emailed her the question word for word in one occasion. Giving any domain on a question is called: cheating. Hillary did not report this so she was complicit in cheating.
    --- Post Merged, Oct 31, 2016 ---
    Don't be confused Hillary's corruption ties run deep.
     
  6. MadeTheSwitch macrumors 6502a

    MadeTheSwitch

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    #6
    That didn't answer my question.
     
  7. Zombie Acorn thread starter macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #7
    The more important part is not how Brazile got the questions, she's obviously a piece of ****. The more pressing question is why didn't Clinton report that she was being fed the questions? What type of integrity does that show?
     
  8. nebo1ss macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2010
    #8
    Of course the facts are she stopped being a talking head on CNN in July when she became head of the DNC. She resigned on October 14th.
     
  9. Zombie Acorn thread starter macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #9
    She won't be contributing at all on CNN

     
  10. iapplelove macrumors 68040

    iapplelove

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2011
    Location:
    East Coast USA
    #10
    One would think she would have done better in the debates with the questions already being fed to her. Sad just sad.

    What a sad corrupt politician Hillary Clinton is. The worst.
     
  11. jkcerda macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #11
    Crooked Clinton has no integrity and her supporters don't care.
     
  12. ronntaylor macrumors regular

    ronntaylor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2004
    Location:
    Flushing/Queens, New York
    #12
    I applaud CNN for parting with a partisan hack that is working on behalf of a presidential candidate. Media have an obligation to play fair and to be transparent. They are to be...

    What's that? Corey Lewandowski didn't resign?! CNN isn't appalled by his actions on behalf of Trump (whose campaign is still paying him and Lewandowski was seen exiting his campaign plane recently).

    Hmpf! That's odd.
     
  13. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
  14. Herdfan macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    #14
    I don't think "CNN" as an organization did. But she worked for CNN so someone there could have easily slipped her the questions. What she shouldn't have done is pass them on.
     
  15. Zombie Acorn thread starter macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #15
    Lewandowski didn't feed Trump questions for the debate. Hillary has no integrity left.
     
  16. CaptMurdock macrumors 6502a

    CaptMurdock

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Location:
    The Evildrome Boozerama
    #16
    [CNN spokesperson] Pratapas disclaimed any involvement by CNN itself, saying the network “never gave Brazile access to any questions, prep material, attendee list, background information or meetings in advance of a town hall or debate.”

    The question still remains: how would Brazile have gotten the questions she supposedly emailed to Podesta?
     
  17. thermodynamic Suspended

    thermodynamic

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    USA
    #17
    Didn't she also create a lie during the Dukakis campaign or something? Can't believe Clinton would bring her in...
     
  18. Zombie Acorn thread starter macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #18
    There's no supposedly about it, she said in the email that she sometimes gets the questions early and posted the question word for word in one case and gave the subject of another one. What do you expect? The person who leaked it to her to stand up and admit it? LOL

    Regardless of how Hillary received a question she should have reported it.
     
  19. werked macrumors regular

    werked

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2016
    #19
    I'd have to go dig around but I'm almost certain HRC was asked if she was given any questions. She said no of course....so, no way this is true. She wouldn't lie.
     
  20. ibookg409 Suspended

    ibookg409

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2016
    Location:
    Portsmouth, NH
    #20
    Why should they? They know that drones like vulchR will support her no matter what.
     
  21. Gutwrench macrumors 65816

    Gutwrench

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2011
    #21
    It's anyone's guess.

    https://www.yahoo.com/movies/cnn-parts-ways-donna-brazile-debate-questions-were-040000691.html
     
  22. mrkramer macrumors 603

    mrkramer

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere
    #22
    How difficult would it be to fake an incriminating emai and embed it with real ones? Obviously everyone knows the questions now since the debates are over, I could see it either way, but clearly there are hackers trying to hurt Clinton so why wouldn't they lie and make fake emails?
     
  23. Zombie Acorn thread starter macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #23
    Well first we would need someone in the Clinton camp to say the email was fake, they haven't said anything like that because they know they will be acknowledging cheating during the debates.

    Emails typically contain header and signature information to help prove authenticity as well, that info could be doctored, but at the scale of email coming out of wikileaks it's doubtful.
     
  24. Gjwilly macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    May 1, 2011
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    #24
    Two different organizations confirmed that the emails were genuine using DKIM

    http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/21/h...a-brazile-is-wrong-wikileaks-emails-are-real/
     
  25. mrkramer macrumors 603

    mrkramer

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere
    #25
    I'm sure the majority of the emails are real, but it wouldn't take much editing to insert a couple fake ones like this.
     

Share This Page