Link to watch livestream: http://www.npr.org/2017/06/08/53164...estifies-before-senate-intelligence-committee WSJ Live Coverage (in case you don't have access to speakers): http://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/ex-fbi-director-james-comey-testimony-mike-flynn-russia-trump
they are asking him if he has doubts about Russians wanting to interfere blah blah blah. does he have any PROOF?
I'm guessing yes. I'm guessing he can't speak to what that proof is. Nor was he asked. He wasn't rebuffed either. --- Post Merged, Jun 8, 2017 --- I believe the issue will be less what Trump said with Comey. Comey's firing in relation to the investigation is likely the bigger fish.
Are you listening? What about 100s if not over a 1000 Russian intrusions? What do you want for proof, printed intelligence documents?
Following along in a thread on another site. Someone said AG Lynch directed him to refer to the Clinton e-mail as a "matter" vs an "investigation".
I believe his testimony is considered under oath. Saying there were some number of intrusions, equates to as much proof we are going to see, versus he imagined intrusions.
Hillary still has a chance here. --- Post Merged, Jun 8, 2017 --- Intrusions into what? The DNC e-mail leaks or something else?
Why have we only found out that Trump wasn't under investigation from this testimony? So many leaks, yet this tidbit wasn't ever on the front page of CNN. Strange, that.
Trump is ****ed. He may get off of a technicality but since he was never a lawyer or a politician he doesn't know that he can't actually run the government like one of his businesses. The whole Russia thing looks like complete smoke yet succeeded in making Trump slip up.
did you even watch it? they were "given the information" about the "intrusion" from a PRIVATE PARTY, their team (FBI) did NOT ever touch the "devices".................. he can't tell you he has evidence because TADA, all he has is a private parties say so in the matter.
They got nothing, otherwise this would have been over long ago. Left is dragging this thing hoping it would win them brownie points.
It's really hard to swallow that you are knee jerking a rejection of Comey's testimony. You actually think this represents any kind of a reality? Find the cartoon that illustrates the Russian investigation. My guess there are stacks and stacks of data.