No, not the medical kind! Link (NYTimes, need to login) Seems they have found it necessary, against many of their own proponents, to shred documents that have not been archieved. Against their own policy, and possibly not within the protections provided by law for these things. The most interesting part of the article to me, that employees wanted to be nameless for fear of their jobs! working for the ACLU may not provide the benefits they seem to champion. Oh well, not the end of the world, and I doubt it really means much, other than a fundemental change in their philosophy. Interesting read though. To make it clear, I don't believe they are trying to hide illegal activity or any of the sort. Just some good irony.