court strikes blow against ObamaCare subsidies

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by jkcerda, Jul 22, 2014.

  1. jkcerda macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #1
    HOPE the MANDATE gets killed.
     
  2. Eraserhead macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #2
    Then Obamacare is dead.
     
  3. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #3
    I'll say this, we do live in interesting times.


    Separate US appeals court upholds Obamacare subsidies




    ----------


    Did you miss the Supreme Court upholding the ACA and classifying the mandate as a tax?
     
  4. jkcerda thread starter macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #4
    sweet.:)

    no, it is funny how the courts are all over each other.
     
  5. Eraserhead macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #5
    Then what?
     
  6. jkcerda thread starter macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #6
    hard to say, heard single payer is what other nations use, I am still interested in hearing/learning about it. the MANDATE was my only real issue with the ACA. we DID need reform, ACA IMHO was not it.
     
  7. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #7

    Single payer would solve many of our healthcare issues but can't happen in our current political climate.

    As for the ACA, while far from perfect, it DID reform healthcare.
     
  8. Renzatic Suspended

    Renzatic

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Location:
    Gramps, what the hell am I paying you for?
    #8
    What else could you do? The ACA was the best compromise between the terribly broken status quo and true universal healthcare, and even it was nothing more than a bandaid on a gaping wound.
     
  9. Prof. macrumors 601

    Prof.

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Chicago
    #9
    People are up in arms about ACA subsidies but not the 1.5 TRILLION the pentagon is spending on a fighter jet that doesn't work.

    'Murica. :rolleyes:

    Building killing machines: Patriotic
    Spending money to save lives: Communism, Socialism, Un-American
     
  10. jkcerda thread starter macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #10
    that is because even the democrats are in the pockets of the insurance CO's.
     
  11. tgara macrumors 6502a

    tgara

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2012
    Location:
    Somewhere in the Delta Quadrant
    #11
    It's hard to overstate how significant this decision is. Much bigger than Hobby Lobby.
     
  12. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #12

    Which one, the 4th circuit or DC circuit?
     
  13. bradl macrumors 68040

    bradl

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    #13
    What decision? there are conflicting decisions, that effectively cancel eachother out. So right now, we know nothing because it is in limbo.

    BL.
     
  14. tgara, Jul 22, 2014
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2014

    tgara macrumors 6502a

    tgara

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2012
    Location:
    Somewhere in the Delta Quadrant
    #14
    DC circuit. Since it is based in the District of Columbia where Congress sits, it carries much more weight on matters of federal statutory interpretation than any of the other circuits. That said, however, since there is a circuit conflict now with CA4, there is a good chance SCOTUS will hear the case. Huge amounts of money are at stake which could cripple the ACA.
     
  15. Prof. macrumors 601

    Prof.

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Chicago
    #15
    What's so wrong with paying a little extra tax to ensure every US American has health insurance? I'm a college student with a full-time job that pays me $24,000/yr and I don't mind paying a little extra per year to make sure everyone can have affordable health insurance.

     
  16. Vanilla Ice macrumors 6502

    Vanilla Ice

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #16

    The F35 will work. The problems will be solved. And hundreds of thousands of jobs will be kept. You know, Jobs. Something America needs.... As far as the ACA goes, it was passed to quickly. It's still a broken system and has issues. But who cares? Obamacare just sounded too cool not to pass!

    Progressive.
     
  17. quagmire macrumors 603

    quagmire

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    #17
    You just said what the F-35 has become. It's a jobs project. It's not about the fact the F-35 is a POS. It's not about we would have gotten better planes that were designed for specific roles than this do it all BS for less money, etc. It's about congressman keeping jobs in their district so they can get reelected and make the people stuffing their pockets( aka Lockheed) happy as well.

    And the military officials won't say anything negative about it because if they do, that hampers their prospects for getting promoted.

    The ACA is far from perfect too. Both are ****ed up. But how about we stop throwing money at troubled programs and hold companies accountable for delays, problems, etc? Lockheed is loving it right now. Develop a POS product, still making a profit off of it because the government is still pours money into the program. If Lockheed stuck with the commercial side of aviation, they would find themselves in a McDonald Douglas situation. Screw up after screw up after screw up, but Lockheed isn't close to bankruptcy/merging. Nope they are rewarded still with nice profits.
     
  18. Michael Goff macrumors G4

    Michael Goff

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    #18
    Except it doesn't mean anything right now. It doesn't mean anything unless they don't appeal or this doesn't go to the SCotUS. Seriously, this will do NOTHING.

    ----------

    If it's about jobs, we could get more jobs doing something as simple as spending the money on infrastructure improvement. It would also help improve the economy if we're fixing our roads and rails. >_>
     
  19. bradl macrumors 68040

    bradl

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    #19
    Agreed. Our airports look like crap. They need serious renovation. Our roads look worse, especially when we see shreds of tires littering the entire system. Our rails are a joke, our bridges need reinforcement, all of which are jobs to do, yet people want to throw more money at the military, and say that 'it creates jobs!'

    We have jobs here that people need to do, who aren't willing to do it.

    BL.
     
  20. capathy21 macrumors 65816

    capathy21

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2014
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    #20
    I completely agree. I am also a college student working full time and making a little less than you do.

    To answer you question, nothing is wrong with it. The reason we won't see it is due in large to selfishness and ignorance.

    Take this dumb S.O.B. who is the reason the court made the decision they did. This guy making 20,000 a year, could have had healthcare coverage for a total of 21 bucks a YEAR. He started moaning about how he doesn't want a "government handout," and feels he shouldn't be mandated to pay 21 dollars a year, when he can be ignorant, and go without healthcare.

    This is the ignorance of America on display. This is what we are up against. It's enough to make you bang your head against the wall.
     
  21. lannister80 macrumors 6502

    lannister80

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    #21
    Won't it go to Federal Circuit next, which is packed with Democrats/Obama nominees?

    ----------

    What, useless jobs that are paid for by our tax dollars? I thought you were against welfare...

    And really, hundreds of thousands of jobs that will disappear without the F35? Got a citation?
     
  22. EvilQueen macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2013
    Location:
    In my own world
    #22
    Yep, made it more expensive for many and reduced the coverage for the things I want and increased the coverage for the things I don't need.
     
  23. Renzatic Suspended

    Renzatic

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Location:
    Gramps, what the hell am I paying you for?
    #23
    Like what? Give us some examples here.
     
  24. tgara macrumors 6502a

    tgara

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2012
    Location:
    Somewhere in the Delta Quadrant
    #24
    No, wrong court. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) hears patent cases exclusively. This ain't that.

    The decision today was by a 3 judge panel of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (CADC). It has 11 judges and 6 senior judges, but to divide up the substantial workload, they break the work into 3 judge panels.

    What can happen now is that the parties can appeal to either the full CADC (in a so-called "en banc" hearing where all the judges hear and rule on the case), or they can appeal to the Supreme Court.
     
  25. lannister80 macrumors 6502

    lannister80

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    #25
    Ah, thank you!
     

Share This Page