Disney to Workers: Drop Dead! But First, Train Your Foreign Replacements.

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by aaronvan, Jun 8, 2015.

  1. aaronvan Suspended

    aaronvan

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Location:
    República Cascadia
    #1
  2. .Andy macrumors 68030

    .Andy

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Location:
    The Mergui Archipelago
    #2
    Are american workers really so poorly skilled and have such a poor work ethic that they aren't competitive when challenged domestically with workers from the "third world"?
     
  3. obeygiant macrumors 68040

    obeygiant

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Location:
    totally cool
    #3
    Do people in Australia ever read the article posted in the OP?




    --Instead, about 250 Disney employees were told in late October that they would be laid off. Many of their jobs were transferred to immigrants on temporary visas for highly skilled technical workers, who were brought in by an outsourcing firm based in India. Over the next three months, some Disney employees were required to train their replacements to do the jobs they had lost.

    “I just couldn’t believe they could fly people in to sit at our desks and take over our jobs exactly,” said one former worker, an American in his 40s who remains unemployed since his last day at Disney on Jan. 30. “It was so humiliating to train somebody else to take over your job. I still can’t grasp it.”

    Disney executives said that the layoffs were part of a reorganization, and that the company opened more positions than it eliminated.

    Too often, critics say, the visas are being used to bring in immigrants to do the work of Americans for less money, with laid-off American workers having to train their replacements.

    The program has created a highly lucrative business model of bringing in cheaper H-1B workers to substitute for Americans,” said Ronil Hira, a professor of public policy at Howard University who studies visa programs and has testified before Congress about H-1B visas.--
     
  4. aaronvan thread starter Suspended

    aaronvan

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Location:
    República Cascadia
    #4
    Do you really need to ask if American labor unions are competitive at $0.60/hour? Seriously?
     
  5. samiwas macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    #5
    You're fired, but you need to train your replacement? Sounds like the right time to say "Screw you" and leave. Of course, this would probably negate your being able to claim unemployment, so hopefully you can pick something up quickly.
     
  6. .Andy, Jun 8, 2015
    Last edited: Jun 8, 2015

    .Andy macrumors 68030

    .Andy

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Location:
    The Mergui Archipelago
    #6
    No. Read what I posted again. Immigrants from the "third world" are not getting paid 0.60/hour to work domestically in the US.

    Again if local workers aren't competitive enough and can be outsource overseas surely this is the Libertarian wet dream. It is very interesting to see so many socialists coming out of the woodwork in favour of larger government, more tariffs, and more barriers to trade. It is amazing what a bit of xenophobia can accomplish.
     
  7. Happybunny macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    #7
    Oh the smell of double standards, the cry from free marketeers when suddenly they find that it's their jobs and living standards on the line.

    It's stories like this that just prove that the Libertarian idea only works on paper.
     
  8. aaronvan thread starter Suspended

    aaronvan

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Location:
    República Cascadia
    #8
    No, they making $0.60/hour in China. However, H1-B visa holders do work for far less than Americans and they are stealing American jobs.

    You conflation of libertarians and socialists makes zero sense.
     
  9. Happybunny macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    #9
    IMO I think that your are wrong, that's not stealing, that's just market forces.

    Wall street and the stockholders love it, go Capitalism.
     
  10. .Andy macrumors 68030

    .Andy

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Location:
    The Mergui Archipelago
    #10
    This isn't what your thread is about or what I posted.

    So your claim is that American's aren't able to hold their jobs when faced by unskilled, relatively poorly educated individuals from the "3rd world?". That's a pretty damming assessment of the U.S. education system and workforce.

    You seem to not understand the term "conflate". I was also clearly referring to big "L" Libertarians.
     
  11. jnpy!$4g3cwk macrumors 65816

    jnpy!$4g3cwk

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    #11
    I'm unable to disambiguate the irony, sarcasm, agreement, etc. from this post. Can you please rewrite it for me to be literal, as if for a man from Mars?
     
  12. lowendlinux Contributor

    lowendlinux

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2014
    Location:
    North Country (way upstate NY)
    #12
    H1-B is not for unskilled labor it's supposed to be for specialty occupations where the skill set doesn't exist locally. It was intended to be a stop gap to keep business' running, but what it's turned into is yet another way to reduce labor costs. I have no issues with H1B used as it's intended I do have issues with it as it's used now.
     
  13. Eraserhead macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #13
    So you're a socialist?
     
  14. Happybunny macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    #14
    I have to ask do you HATE America, are you some type of communist, are you trying to destroy the American dream.
    If Wall Street and the Stockholders like the idea of CUTTING costs who are you to say that they are wrong, some type of socialist rat, thats who.

    If they are unemployed, they are just moochers, they should pull them selves up by there boot straps, move to where there is work, and stop complaining.

    Low wages are what built America, think of the Gilded Age.

    Think of the poor down trodden CEO’s who will miss their bonuses, think of all those Hedge Fund managers who will miss out on their target growth.
     
  15. vrDrew macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Location:
    Midlife, Midwest
    #15
    In all fairness I think you are conflating several different issues here. Democratic support for initiatives such as the DREAM Act (which would grant conditional residency and offer a passage to citizenship for alien residents who had come to this country as children) is completely separate from the discussion of H-1B Visas, which are supposed to be for highly-skilled technology workers.

    From my reading of this story, it appears as if Disney mis-handled this reorganization; and perhaps exploited a loophole in the H-1B visa program. My understanding of the H-1B program is that it is only for instances where qualified US workers were unavailable - which is clearly not the case here.

    More to the point, I see that Senator Bill Nelson (a Democrat) has called for an inquiry into how the H-1B Visa program may have been misused at Disney.

     
  16. sim667 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    #16
    This is to be expected in america's vacuous capitalist society......

    Repress workers rights, maximise profits margins, let the bourgieous flash the cash in an orgy of spending (I was watching an american car auction last night, they were treating it like a sport).
     
  17. aaronvan thread starter Suspended

    aaronvan

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    Location:
    República Cascadia
    #17
    Sure, why not?

    Or when there is a foreign worker willing to work for much less than an American worker.
     
  18. Happybunny macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    #18
    But hey at least the job stays in the USA.:D

    Which means that taxes are paid, the corporation has lower costs, Wall Street And Investors happy.

    Go Capitalism.
     
  19. snberk103 macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Location:
    An Island in the Salish Sea
    #19
    Seems like an easy fix to the legislation: Company must certify there have been no lay-offs of employees with similar skills, the company must show evidence of trying to hire at the local/state/national level, the and that the job has been vacant for a period of time (for an established company - obviously a new or growing company would need to comply with only the first two criteria.)

    I'm not in US and therefore not familiar with the provisions of the visa. Perhaps the law already calls for these protections - in which case... who is overseeing the program?
     
  20. Happybunny macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    #20
    That really doesn't sound like the FREE market.
    Corporations should be able to cut costs as they see fit, big government is trying to stifle the real innovation that made America the great country it was in the Glided Age.
     
  21. jnpy!$4g3cwk macrumors 65816

    jnpy!$4g3cwk

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    #21
    Well, as a matter of fact, those protections do exist. The problem is that there usually is no real penalty for the employer, even when the violation is blatantly obvious, as it is in this case. Department of Labor oversees the program.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-1B_visa#No_labor_shortages

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-1B_visa
     
  22. gkarris macrumors 604

    gkarris

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2004
    Location:
    "No escape from Reality..."
    #22
    Do what companies do now - make the job requirements harder for Americans. Require fluency in Sanskrit - problem solved... :eek:
     
  23. Zombie Acorn macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #23
    Having experienced employees train h1Bs as their replacements flies in the face of the purpose of the visa. There should be an investigation for sure and heavy fines/restriction from using this program in the future.
     
  24. Happybunny macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    #24

    I have to ask doesn’t that defeat the purpose of the free market.

    Surely corporations should be able to maximise profits, while minimising costs without government interference.

    Other wise you might as well live in a communistic or socialist nation.

    Why should shareholders miss out on profits, because some over paid person wants to keep his job?
     
  25. jkcerda Suspended

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #25
    the GOVT granted the visas, so how is that "free" market?
     

Share This Page