I surely don't think so. It seems that Republicans are more concerned with the unborn vs the babies and children that already were born. How can you speak pro life and be against the same life you claim to be saving? Force a women to give birth against her will only to take away a health care reform that would insure the same child's interests. That doesn't sound right at all. Allowing and fighting to preserve weak gun regulations in plenty states which in many cases lead to a child's death. Last major example in Aurora. Where does "Pro Life" fit here? In most cases, it's the Republicans taking away the programs, cutting funds to schools, and etc: from the kids in communities that need it the most. The logical stereotype towards a party that's so much against abortion would be a party that stands by children from the most privileged down to the most needy. You would think that they wouldn't be so quick to send troops as young as 17yrs old into war. You would expect them to focus more on educating our youth vs building more jails/prisons. But nope, the Republicans are the complete opposite. They have no real interest in giving the average middle or lower class kids the best opportunities, but yet they fight so freaking hard to make sure they are born. They rather deport striaght A students back to his/her war torn or dangerous country of origin even though they have been in America since before they could talk. I refuse to look at Republicans as "Pro Life". "Anti Abortionist" is a more fitting term.