Documents Show DOJ Was in Panic Mode

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by jkcerda, Aug 7, 2017.

  1. jkcerda macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #1
    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katie...eeting-with-bill-clinton-was-exposed-n2364588

    glad the crooked one lost.
     
  2. WarHeadz macrumors 6502a

    WarHeadz

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2015
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #2
    No he didn't....
     
  3. steve knight macrumors 68020

    steve knight

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
  4. linuxcooldude macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    #4
    Wonder if those were a part of 33,000 deleted emails.
     
  5. vrDrew macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Location:
    Midlife, Midwest
    #5
    What a load of garbage.

    I'm curious if JK actually read the Townhall piece. Because it is laughable. The "hundreds of documents" appear to be nothing more than e-mails from journalists asking questions, and the press officer replying that they had nothing to add to what was said in the press conference. "Panic mode" is defined, at least by the morons at Townhall, to be a press offcer sending his boss an e-mail noting that he was getting questions.

    You know, maybe if people had spent more time worrying about Donald Trump and his slimy organization of crooks, liars, and lunatics meeting in secret with actual Russian spies rather than an innocent - and notably public - meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch; then this proud country of ours wouldn't be in the sorry state it is.
     
  6. DearthnVader macrumors 6502

    DearthnVader

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2015
    Location:
    Red Springs, NC
    #6
    A "notably public" meeting that took place away from the public eye, with no transcript of what was said between a former president and the top law enforcement officer just days before she had to decide the fate of his wife, that also happened to be the lending Democratic candidate for president.

    Nothing to see here folks, move along.:rolleyes:
     
  7. linuxcooldude macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    #7
    Most interesting. Loretta Lynch was using an email alias. Something your not suppose to do.
     
  8. bopajuice macrumors 6502a

    bopajuice

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2016
    #8
    Did they keep Lynch's dress as evidence?
     
  9. vrDrew macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Location:
    Midlife, Midwest
    #9
    The level of selective outrage is quite stunning here.

    When Bill Clinton met with Loretta Lynch he was a private citizen. He held no power over the Attorney General whatsoever. And according to both participants account, the discussion was purely on social and family matters. Even if they both are lying, there is precisely zero evidence to suggest that Loretta Lynch interfered in any way with the investigation of Clinton's wife.

    And yet we compare the actions of Donald Trump: He - as President - freely admits he met with a law enforcement officer conducting an investigation into one of his associates and freely admits he inveigled James Comey to stop the investigation. When Comey refused to do so, he was fired. Trump follows up on this by publicly threatening to fire both his own Attorney General and the Special Prosecutor looking into matters surrounding his campaign.

    Yes: Nothing to see in the Trump White House. Move along, Comrade.
     
  10. linuxcooldude macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    #10
    No evidence...ha! Comey under oath said Lynch wanted him to call it a matter rather than an investigation. Selective outrage indeed.

    Lock her up! ( Loretta Lynch )
     
  11. Thomas Veil macrumors 68020

    Thomas Veil

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2004
    Location:
    OBJECTIVE reality
    #11
    My takeaways from this story are that Townhall writes florid headlines and that Melanie Newman, author of the July 1 memo, needs to learn the difference between "it's" and "its".
     
  12. VulchR macrumors 68020

    VulchR

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    #12
    Agreed. At best that meeting was beyond stupidity, at worst it was criminal. I hope it is being investigated as much as Trump's Russian connection.
     
  13. Zombie Acorn macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #13
    This is extremely suspicious.
     
  14. Gutwrench macrumors 65816

    Gutwrench

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2011
    #14
    Let's see if they will be forced to restore and release the redacted "talking points".
     
  15. BoxerGT2.5 macrumors 68000

    BoxerGT2.5

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2008
    #15
    Now that's rather naive. Just a plain old private citizen, former POTUS who's wife is running for the same office at the time, currently under investigation, former Sec of State, Senator, FLOTUS. But yeah, a couple of plain old folks. Because we know the Clinton's have like ZERO influence in democratic politics.
     
  16. jkcerda thread starter macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #16
    yours? indeed; i love irony in the morning :D
     
  17. vrDrew macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Location:
    Midlife, Midwest
    #17
    Maybe you can explain what you are so outraged over? Or is your standard for outrage pretty much anytime someone named Clinton does anything?

    People are allowed to meet with one another. It happens all the time. It only actually becomes a crime if they, together or separately, decide to break the law. You can meet a police officer after work in a bar. It only actually becomes a crime if you offer him money to ignore some nefarious enterprise you plan on undertaking.

    So, again, for clarity's sake: What exactly are the conservative nitwits at Townhall so outraged over?
     
  18. jkcerda thread starter macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #18
    try post 10-12-15........ hell post 10 spells it right out .
     
  19. vrDrew macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Location:
    Midlife, Midwest
    #19
    Nope. Sorry. Not even close.

    If you want a textbook example of "Obstruction of Justice" - Donald Trump's little tete-a-tetes with James Comey fit the bill: Person in a position of power requests an underling in law enforcement stop investigating a crime he is connected with.

    We don't have that with Bill Clinton's airport meeting with Lynch. Neither party says they talked about anything other than social matters. Clinton was in no position to exert influence over Lynch. And there is no indication that Lynch changed her behavior as a result of that meeting.

    If you don't understand the difference, then I'm wasting my time with you.
     
  20. Rhonindk macrumors 68020

    Rhonindk

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2014
    Location:
    Bloom County: Meadow Party
    #20
    Not uncommon. Aliases are frequently used.
    (ALIAS ARTICLE)

    I suspect we will see a bit more on this ...
    (FOX ARTICLE)
    (CNN ARTICLE)
     
  21. jkcerda thread starter macrumors 6502

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #21
    actually it it obvious I am wasting MY time with YOU..........not surprising at all.
     
  22. DrewDaHilp1 macrumors 6502a

    DrewDaHilp1

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    All Your Memes Are Belong to US
    #22
    Normal people don't go to secret meetings that take place in an airplane on airport runways to talk about "golf" and "grandchildren". Talk about naivety.
     
  23. Rhonindk macrumors 68020

    Rhonindk

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2014
    Location:
    Bloom County: Meadow Party
    #23
    Anyone who thinks that BC had no influence .... wow
     
  24. edk99 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    May 27, 2009
    Location:
    FL
    #24
    So a former president who's wife is running for president who is under investigation by the DOJ is in no position to exert influence over Lynch???

    So if Bill would mention anything like "Loretta, do you like your job? Do you want to keep it past Jan 20th when my wife becomes president?" Yeah you are right he is in no position to exert influence over Lynch. :rolleyes:
     
  25. linuxcooldude macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    #25
    Let me guess, all they talked about were weddings and yoga.

    Bill Clinton could easily promise Lynch many things if the investigation would go away once Hilary was President. Like a nice cabinet position or continuation of her position at the DOJ. Its called conflict of interest. Considering after Comey's testimony it looks more like an obstruction of justice.
     

Share This Page