http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miche...omise-anti-lgbt-supreme-court_b_12551640.html Which probably means a few more things along with LGBT rights, but the article seems gung-ho in making it gay-only. Thankfully, after a while, a reference of a little substance (with inference) is presented: Hope the Log Cabin Republicans don't turn all Mafia III as a result... I'm sure they won't care. Gay republicans last decade didn't so why would they now? Unless they got paid more by a competing lobbying group?