Emails suggest Clinton is still privately against same-sex marriage

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by zin, Oct 11, 2016.

  1. zin macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    #1
    We all know that Clinton has public/private positions that she blamed on Abraham Lincoln.

    In an email discussing her positions on same-sex marriage and DOMA, her aides appear to suggest that, privately, her position on marriage has not changed.

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2631

    Hope people wake up and realise this woman is nothing but a phony, using you for votes.
     
  2. WarHeadz macrumors 6502a

    WarHeadz

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2015
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #2
    Once again, out of context. What she and her husband believe and have repeated multiple times is that DOMA was necessary at the time to prevent a constitutional amendment banning same sex marriage which would have easily passed at the time. It was the lesser of two evils for the moment, they were happy to see it overturned in favor of progress. If DOMA was never passed and there was a constitutional amendment banning same sex marriage passed instead, it's very likely that amendment would still be in effect today and we wouldn't have achieved marriage equality for a long time to come.
     
  3. Khalanad75 macrumors 6502

    Khalanad75

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2015
    Location:
    land of confusion
    #3
    OMG, someone can possible think one way privately, yet still support something outwardly because they know it's for the greater good of the country and it's citizens. It's amazing!!!

    I'll admit, homo sexual intercourse between men grosses me out, yet I am still full on for LGBT rights including marriage. To each their own because what someone else does in their bedroom has no effect on my marriage whatsoever.
     
  4. nfl46 macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    #4
    Jesus Christ...stop it, Zin! You're embarrassing yourself!
     
  5. CaptMurdock macrumors 6502a

    CaptMurdock

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Location:
    The Evildrome Boozerama
    #5
    Everybody needs a hobby.
     
  6. zin thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    #6
    'Believe' is present tense. And what you're saying makes no sense. The aides say they doubt Hillary will explicitly disavow her previous position, leading to this email, stating why she probably won't disavow it.
     
  7. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #7
    @zin, you're not looking too good today. My advice, take a step back from the keyboard, breathe deeply and look into context before you start another inane Wikileaks thread.
     
  8. Moyank24 macrumors 601

    Moyank24

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Location:
    in a New York State of mind
    #8
    To be fair, who the hell cares what she thinks privately about SSM?

    The only thing we care about is if she then turned around and forced those views on us through legislation (like Republicans continue to do). And I think it's safe to say that she isn't going to do that.

    People have been saying the same thing about Obama for years. But the fact that these people continue to do the opposite of their beliefs only hurts your argument. And makes the Republicans still trying to fight this look that much worse.
     
  9. zin thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    #9
    I got 4 hours of sleep today. It must be showing.

    I do think I read that other email wrong on 'everyday Americans', but not this one.
     
  10. Gutwrench macrumors 65816

    Gutwrench

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2011
    #10
    Agreed, judges do it all the time. They must.
     
  11. DrewDaHilp1 macrumors 6502a

    DrewDaHilp1

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    All Your Memes Are Belong to US
  12. samcraig macrumors P6

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    #12
    Who's having the bigger meltdown today - Zin or Trump. Maybe I should create a topic/poll?
     
  13. MadeTheSwitch macrumors 6502a

    MadeTheSwitch

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    #13
    The irony of that statement from a Trump supporter is really quite striking. The only time Trump loved the gays was after the Orlando incident where he thought he could pick up some votes. Didn't mention or pay much attention to our community before, hasn't mentioned or paid much attention to it since.

    Like everything else about sniffles (wealth, taxes, charity, university) on this issue also, the man is a fraud.
    --- Post Merged, Oct 11, 2016 ---
    Yeah...you know who else gets four hours of sleep and doesn't have a good showing for it??? Trump. :D
     
  14. AlliFlowers Contributor

    AlliFlowers

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Location:
    L.A. (Lower Alabama)
    #14
    I'm thrilled that Hillary can hold her personal beliefs separate. That is a quality of a GREAT politician. Just as Tim Kaine pointed out in the VP debate, as a Catholic he is against abortion. But the will of the people comes first.

    This is why so many of us, dare I say a majority, don't want Trump or Pence. Pence wants to turn the US into another religious nation, despite our melting pot of religious beliefs.
     
  15. zin thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    #15
    What exactly do you wish he would have done regarding this issue? He went to gay ceremonies, he spoke (very) favourably over a decade ago, and has been very candid about his views on marriage. He was a businessman, not a politician. He wasn't exactly giving speeches on the Senate floor like Clinton.
     
  16. Moyank24 macrumors 601

    Moyank24

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Location:
    in a New York State of mind
    #16
    Well, for one, maybe not choose a running mate who hates the gays??
     
  17. zin thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    #17
    I'm not sure he hates gays. He just doesn't know what he's talking about. Besides, my question was about Trump, not Pence. The VP has no power.
     
  18. thermodynamic Suspended

    thermodynamic

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    USA
    #18
    If I were a leader of a country that is "by, for, and of the people', I would have to take a lot into consideration. Including things I might not always like and try to find a reasonable compromise. Personal opinion vs what helps all in a country, I don't see how marriage is a bad thing. Or civil unions. If people want them. Like when people go to work and have to work on a project they don't want to but they do it anyway.

    And considering Elton John was against "marriage" before he decided to support it (and being poly, the issue only becomes more complex but marriage is still a legal issue at its core or else government would not have been involved with hetero marriages)...

    And the gays that don't want to marry (by calling it outdated, archaic, heteronormative, etc, etc) aren't really going to care either way what happens with it and by extension those who half-support it, begrudgingly support it, wholly support it, etc. That's their problem, not hers.

    Sounds like she's trying to deal with a lot, on an issue that affects remarkably few. Since democracies and democratic republics invariably have to include people that don't fit the majority view. Genuine kudos to her. I said that before recently as well. Haven't had any epiphany and/or new reason to change my stance so far.
     
  19. MadeTheSwitch macrumors 6502a

    MadeTheSwitch

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    #19
    Oh I don't know. Not pay attention to us only when it's politically expedient? Not try to use us as pawns? Not say he'd put people on the Supreme Court in favor of reversing marriage equality?

    If something happens to the President they sure do. Not to mention having the ear of the President on an ongoing basis. Thanks but no thanks.
     
  20. thermodynamic Suspended

    thermodynamic

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    USA
    #20
    If the president stands down or leaves, the VP becomes P and thus gets a lot of power. Breaking ties is also a fair amount of power, albeit rarely used. That's why I don't discount the VP debates, even if the probability is low.
     
  21. zin thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    #21
    But you're ignoring the fact that he has been far more favourable even before Clinton.

    And to be honest, that is never going to happen. He won't nominate anybody that will reverse marriage equality. You talk pandering, well there it is. He's pandering to the religious loons.
     
  22. Moyank24 macrumors 601

    Moyank24

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Location:
    in a New York State of mind
    #22
    Well, from where I'm sitting, it sure looks like hate. It's way beyond not knowing what he's talking about. But if you want to come off as a friend to the community, running with someone like Pence is not a good place to start. Neither is talking about appointing Supreme Court justices who would overturn marriage equality.

    So, yeah, showing up at "gay ceremonies" ain't going to cut it.
    --- Post Merged, Oct 11, 2016 ---
    So, you're defending Trump for basically doing the same thing as Hillary? In the thread you started because you wanted to bash her for doing this thing?
     
  23. zin thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    #23
    The difference is her private position is against it. His private position isn't.
     
  24. MadeTheSwitch macrumors 6502a

    MadeTheSwitch

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    #24
    Maybe. But I am not willing to take the chance. And more to the point and subject of the thread, you just admitted that Trump is phony and using people. Which is what you are complaining about Hillary doing.
     
  25. zin thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    #25
    Clinton: still privately believes in DOMA. Didn't switch publicly until 2013. Accepts millions from people who imprison and torture gays. Accepts millions from people who fund other people who throw gays off buildings. Wants a 550% increase in people from regions that hate gays. Panders to everybody.

    Trump: Advocated for sexual orientation to be included in Civil Rights Act in 2000. Spoke very favourably about gays in 2000. Doesn't care that somebody is gay. Has held the same view on marriage since then (states decision). Panders to evangelicals with the sad hope of reversing the Supreme Court decision.

    Not even close. Don't kid yourself.
     

Share This Page