FBI hasn't found a Trump-Russia link.

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by yaxomoxay, Oct 31, 2016.

  1. ibookg409 Suspended

    ibookg409

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2016
    Location:
    Portsmouth, NH
    #2
  2. Zombie Acorn macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
  3. yaxomoxay thread starter macrumors 68020

    yaxomoxay

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Location:
    Texas
    #4
    The Hill --> Pravda.

    Easy connection.
     
  4. Jess13 Suspended

    Jess13

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2013
    #5
    :p

     
  5. steve knight macrumors 68020

    steve knight

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    #6
  6. linuxcooldude macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    #7
    Common deflection technique by the Democrats to wikileaks and other emails.
     
  7. shyam09 macrumors 68020

    shyam09

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2010
    #8
    There's a hill in Russia. Easier connection.
     
  8. jkcerda macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #9
    Considering the fact that the link that tops this very thread says that Russia is involved in disrupting the election, albeit not through Trump, kinda does hint that they may have a point.

    But hey, I guess it's alright when a foreign nation screws with us, so long as your guys are benefiting from it.
     
  9. yaxomoxay thread starter macrumors 68020

    yaxomoxay

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Location:
    Texas
    #10
    It's nothing new. I would be shocked to know that other countries - especially Russia - are not trying to influence the elections and the elected.
     
  10. linuxcooldude macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    #11
    Thats known as an "Argument from Ignorance" It asserts that a proposition is true because it has not yet been proved false. In which ignorance represents a lack of contrary evidence.
     
  11. thermodynamic Suspended

    thermodynamic

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    USA
    #12
    The Hill is Russian?

    http://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-kno...pper-killer-mike-clinton-trump-the-same-thing

    Or they're at least welcoming of fellow communists


    ?
     
  12. skunk macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
    #13
    I have not heard any complaints about any of the other foreign leaders who have openly voiced their horror of Trump. Aren't they trying to influence the election too?
     
  13. TonyC28 macrumors 65816

    TonyC28

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2009
    Location:
    USA
    #14
    Seems like the left's playbook has dwindled down to one remaining page.
    Play 1: When something bad happens for Hillary, try to connect Trump to Russia.
    Play 2: See Play 1.
    Example of practical use: If HRC stubs her toe on a sidewalk, have our connections in the media float the idea of a connection between Trump, Russia, and the contractor who poured the concrete.
     
  14. ibookg409 Suspended

    ibookg409

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2016
    Location:
    Portsmouth, NH
    #15
    Is it better to hide the truth to avoid "Messing with the election"? Let the truth out.
     
  15. APlotdevice macrumors 68040

    APlotdevice

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2011
    #16
    Have those other leaders been implying nuclear war if their mutt doesn't win?
     
  16. yaxomoxay thread starter macrumors 68020

    yaxomoxay

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Location:
    Texas
    #17
    Not sure, but Obama himself involved himself in Italian politics when last week he invited PM Renzi and gave him full support for a very controversial Referendum (a-la Brexit), saying that it is very important that the referendum passes. It is clearly a breach of national sovereignty, and I was utterly disappointed.
     
  17. skunk macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
    #18
    Not exactly, but then neither has Putin, as far as I know.
     
  18. Plutonius macrumors 604

    Plutonius

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Location:
    New Hampshire, USA
    #19
  19. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    #20
    Wait you're telling me that the new Cold War the Neocons (regardless of party) are trying to stir up is just propaganda that will surely spiral out of control?

    Color me....pissed that people still fall for this ********. War 2017 here we come.
     
  20. ibookg409 Suspended

    ibookg409

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2016
    Location:
    Portsmouth, NH
    #21
    Can you provide any evidence for this? Any at all?
     
  21. Gjwilly macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    May 1, 2011
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    #22
    Serious question.
    How is a foreign nation screwing with an election any better or worse than domestic agents screwing with an election?
    On a gut level invoking the Russians is pretty damn serious but there's been quite a few examples this year of internal chicanery and it gets a free pass from whichever side benefits at the time.
     
  22. decafjava macrumors 68020

    decafjava

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Location:
    Geneva
    #23
    The US hasn't done the same thing for like ... forever???
     
  23. jkcerda macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #24
    There's a huge difference between petty intraparty politicking, and a bunch of foreign hackers, either state sponsored or not, breaking into the personal correspondences of one of our parties exclusively, exposing them for all the world to see.

    See, I have no problem with keeping our politicians on their toes. Transparency is a good thing. But when it so greatly favors one party over another, it doesn't become a expose of truth and justice, it's a murky half transparency, becoming yet another campaigning tool, one more dirty and underhanded that most. If both sides aren't being raked through the mud, it's only presenting a half truth, mere propaganda with a truthful bent. At best, it lowers the quality and sanctity of political discourse to a free for all melee, where any and all tactics can be justified during an election season. At worst, it's flat out espionage committed with the intent of sowing confusion.
     
  24. yaxomoxay thread starter macrumors 68020

    yaxomoxay

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Location:
    Texas
    #25
    Wow, it's the first time that I vehemently disagree with you. The philosophy underneath this post is all wrong (repent!).
    You are saying that for some reason that both A and B should be "uncovered", otherwise what we say about A is less relevant.
    A and B are two different cases, not linked. If we know that A is dirty, that doesn't mean that in order to validate my judgment of A I also need dirt on B. B might not have dirt, or at least not even closely to the same level. Whatever happens to B does not invalidate A.
     

Share This Page