Filling the Swamp - Another Goldman Sachs Alum Confirmed


bradl

macrumors 601
Jun 16, 2008
4,006
11,823
Why are Goldman employees "swampy"? I'm not saying you are wrong but what is the standard?
I don't believe he is worried about irony; he is pointing out hypocrisy. Your lot grandstanded on wanting Clinton to release her transcripts for the Goldman Sachs speeches (which were irrelevant), supported a guy who stated that he was going to drain the swamp of the very corporatists and corporate lobbyists that were a plague on our government, then not only did a complete 180-degree shift on that, but continued to fill the swamp with the very same people he campaigned on getting rid of in government.

Your lot supported the guy; your lot owns this, and there is no real defense of his actions. So man up and take responsibility for the smeg-up, instead of trying to find reasons to rationalize and justify his actions.

BL.
 

ibookg409

Suspended
Apr 20, 2016
612
7,356
Portsmouth, NH
I don't believe he is worried about irony; he is pointing out hypocrisy. Your lot grandstanded on wanting Clinton to release her transcripts for the Goldman Sachs speeches (which were irrelevant), supported a guy who stated that he was going to drain the swamp of the very corporatists and corporate lobbyists that were a plague on our government, then not only did a complete 180-degree shift on that, but continued to fill the swamp with the very same people he campaigned on getting rid of in government.

Your lot supported the guy; your lot owns this, and there is no real defense of his actions. So man up and take responsibility for the smeg-up, instead of trying to find reasons to rationalize and justify his actions.

BL.
I asked an honest question about how we define the swamp and you crawled up my ass and got nasty.

Sadly typical of "your lot".
 

bradl

macrumors 601
Jun 16, 2008
4,006
11,823
I asked an honest question about how we define the swamp and you crawled up my ass and got nasty.

Sadly typical of "your lot".
I never personally 'got up your arse'. Your side is all about claiming and taking personal responsibility; now that the person your lot supported is now in the White House, he has failed on doing the exact thing you championed in him. He failed your lot, and your lot was genuinely warned on that; so when are you going to take responsibility for those actions?

BL.
 

jkcerda

macrumors 6502a
Jun 10, 2013
682
38,936
Criminal Mexi Midget
I don't believe he is worried about irony; he is pointing out hypocrisy. Your lot grandstanded on wanting Clinton to release her transcripts for the Goldman Sachs speeches (which were irrelevant), supported a guy who stated that he was going to drain the swamp of the very corporatists and corporate lobbyists that were a plague on our government, then not only did a complete 180-degree shift on that, but continued to fill the swamp with the very same people he campaigned on getting rid of in government.

Your lot supported the guy; your lot owns this, and there is no real defense of his actions. So man up and take responsibility for the smeg-up, instead of trying to find reasons to rationalize and justify his actions.

BL.
since obama bailed out that very swamp you guys should really have no problems with WS being in the WH.
 

jkcerda

macrumors 6502a
Jun 10, 2013
682
38,936
Criminal Mexi Midget
I never personally 'got up your arse'. Your side is all about claiming and taking personal responsibility; now that the person your lot supported is now in the White House, he has failed on doing the exact thing you championed in him. He failed your lot, and your lot was genuinely warned on that; so when are you going to take responsibility for those actions?

BL.
I love irony.....................................
 

ibookg409

Suspended
Apr 20, 2016
612
7,356
Portsmouth, NH
I never personally 'got up your arse'. Your side is all about claiming and taking personal responsibility; now that the person your lot supported is now in the White House, he has failed on doing the exact thing you championed in him. He failed your lot, and your lot was genuinely warned on that; so when are you going to take responsibility for those actions?

BL.
Search my posts. I've said I'm very displeased with Trump and that he's just another political clown, a pig, etc. Where have you been?
 

NT1440

macrumors G5
May 18, 2008
12,141
13,983
since obama bailed out that very swamp you guys should really have no problems with WS being in the WH.
Why? Corporatists coupled with corporate power are destroying the country, why are we to have no problems with it because a corporatist who was a little friendlier on social issues bailed out the swamp previously?

Disingenuousness is unbecoming.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eraserhead

jkcerda

macrumors 6502a
Jun 10, 2013
682
38,936
Criminal Mexi Midget
Why? Corporatists coupled with corporate power are destroying the country, why are we to have no problems with it because a corporatist who was a little friendlier on social issues bailed out the swamp previously?

Disingenuousness is unbecoming.
did I say I was happy? hell neither bailout should have happened IMHO .
 
  • Like
Reactions: ibookg409

NT1440

macrumors G5
May 18, 2008
12,141
13,983
did I say I was happy? hell neither bailout should have happened IMHO .
Being happy, and making a disingenuous assertion about "you guys" (whomever that may be) are to completely different things, if that's what you're going to bold. ;)
 

jkcerda

macrumors 6502a
Jun 10, 2013
682
38,936
Criminal Mexi Midget
Being happy, and making a disingenuous assertion about "you guys" (whomever that may be) are to completely different things, if that's what you're going to bold. ;)
pointing out there was no issue when Obama did bailouts..which again should have never happened, they should have failed.
 

NT1440

macrumors G5
May 18, 2008
12,141
13,983
And the millions he spent (taxpayer funds) to fight FOIA requests. Shameful.
Yup.

There's an interesting dynamic that happens in the USA. Usually, a republican administration comes in and dismantles/alters a preconceived understanding about how laws are applied or adhered to and everyone loses their ****. Then the democratic administration comes in and continues the same process writ large, or tweaking it slightly so it's "smart" which then "legitimizes" said process.

Torture
Habeas
Deportation

Take your pick, all the same schtick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jkcerda

ibookg409

Suspended
Apr 20, 2016
612
7,356
Portsmouth, NH
I never personally 'got up your arse'. Your side is all about claiming and taking personal responsibility;

BL.
Let's get another thing straight before we take one more step. I represent one person: me. I don't have a lot, a crew, a group, anything. I don't speak for anyone else. I speak for me. Don't ask me to defend a group of individuals I've never met.
 

NT1440

macrumors G5
May 18, 2008
12,141
13,983
pointing out there was no issue when Obama did bailouts..which again should have never happened, they should have failed.
Because that had nothing to do with the topic at hand for one thing.

Additionally, I know you have a bad habit of not bothering with the details (and on the bailouts in particular I can't blame you, it's an absurd timeline of events), but which bailout specifically are we talking about?

I personally think the auto bailout was good and necessary, but would have demanded the firing of all the executives and used the government ownership of the car companies to retool them for mass transit in their domestic factories. That alone would have spurred a massive reinvestment all along the supply chain to focus on the needs of the country, instead of pumping out more **** cars.

As for the banks, those *******s should have burned, a debt jubilee declared for their victims, and the executives should still be sitting in jail for a maximum 25 year sentence.


So I personally don't like these "shouldn't have done the bailout" narratives because it conflates separate events, and tends to ignore any and all nuance that should be in any discussion.
 

ibookg409

Suspended
Apr 20, 2016
612
7,356
Portsmouth, NH
So I personally don't like these "shouldn't have done the bailout" narratives because it conflates separate events, and tends to ignore any and all nuance that should be in any discussion.
Let them all fail. No need for nuance. Something fails and something else takes its place. World keeps spinning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jkcerda