Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by alexprice, Jan 27, 2007.
this is also a problem in th US at least on the east coast
Whoa. That sucks.
Good thing I live in California where weed is grown organically and hydroponically by hippies who care.
Has anything like this happen in the past with cannabis? The government should legalize and regulate
No sand in this skunk.
Does anyone else see a problem in that.
Legalization or decriminalizing is the solution. As long as its kept underground only the politician and the drug dealer benefits. We have more damage and hurt from the drug dealers and the police state then from the actual drug. Keeping it underground solves nothing.
Actually, I believe it increases its potency.
One more reason to stay away from drugs.
But you honestly think junkies are going to care? Where do you think this massive "not caring about much" attitude comes from? When my brothers stoned he wouldn't care if a dog crapped on his bed. He actually didn't put up much excitement when he got impaled on a fence!
Do you honestly think someone who smokes weed is a junkie?
Its Reefer madness ,you smoke weed your the devil. Its NeoCon.
Watch out for them crazy weed junkies. They'll eat all your cookies and then sit quietly for hours.
We hear every day how reefer makes people so so violent, might as well throw in too while were at it it has no medicinal purpose and it will make your tits grow, puts hair on your palms and all kind of things. Makes you a killer, rapist hell might even turn you into Dick Cheney.
Grow your own or buy dro. Easy enough.
Plus pot smokers are not "junkies"
I have a 4.0 GPA, so you can suck it.
I wont eat all the cookies either, the Adderall prevents that.
Neo Cons want war profits and the extinction of the middle class.
Regular conservatives believe "the demon weed will get your kids."
..or post on Macrumors Forums.
(come on, we've all done it.)
Post or smoke?
I only smoke when I'm on fire.
now that's a dangerous drug
This thread is making me hungry. I think I got some chicken wings in the fridge...
The only party that I've seen that wants to do anything about dismantling the ill advised war on drugs is Libertarian. Both major parties are too heavily invested in the war on drugs to just declare it a failure and transfer the funding to treatment programs instead of law enforcement.
I'm almost certain that no major presidential candidate for 2008 will come out in favor of stopping the war on drugs.
Without a doubt because it wouldnt build the police state that both parties want. Pushing Paper & Lots & Lots of Laws is a big business. Look at who profits from this stuff. Politicians get Power, Drug Dealers make tax free money, Police state gets more money and control for its Legal system and prison building. The tax payer gets to pay for all of this.
That's the only issue I find myself in agreement with Libertarians on. Clinton presided over the biggest-ever increase in the drug war budget, for all his "progressive" airs.
I don't see the decriminalizing of pot happening anytime soon - but that's more likely to happen IMO than the cessation of the "war on drugs", if by that you mean giving the Columbians Blackhawks and training their special forces etc.
Makes it so much easier to incarcerate those "undesireables" too. It's so much easier to stop someone or pat them down for "reasonable suspicion" and then throw them in jail for possession than to wait until they actually commit a crime.