FOX News Host Says "CEO of Walgreens Destroyed Capitalism

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by capathy21, Aug 7, 2014.

  1. capathy21 macrumors 65816

    capathy21

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2014
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    #1
    http://www.occupydemocrats.com/occu...s-destroyed-capitalism-by-staying-in-america/

    Is this guy serious?


    Once again displaying their true colors, FOXNews actually found a way to harshly criticize Walgreens’ recent decision to not ship their headquarters to Switzerland in order to lower their corporate tax rate, an unpatriotic process known as corporate inversion.

    Incredibly, Fox Business host Charles Payne described Walgreens’ decision to remain an American company as “shameful.”

    Payne said Pres. Obama “scored a huge victory today when the CEO of Walgreens — they made an acquisition of a company, they had an opportunity to do inversion. Instead they said no, we won’t.” He said that decision caused Walgreens stock to lose $10 billion in value and will lose billions more in profits that they would not have to pay have they inverted and left the U.S.

    “So essentially, the CEO of Walgreens destroyed capitalism, shareholder rights,” Payne added. “He not only blinked, he gave the president so much ammunition.”

    Payne concluded: “It was one of the most shameful moves I’ve seen a CEO do in a long time.”

    While the Republican party has always pretended that it supports American jobs, this video shows that the corporate shills at FOXNews have pledged their allegiance to corporate profits — not the American people.
     
  2. G51989, Aug 7, 2014
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2014

    G51989 macrumors 68030

    G51989

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Location:
    NYC NY/Pittsburgh PA
    #2
  3. capathy21 thread starter macrumors 65816

    capathy21

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2014
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    #3
    Only on FOX News would this be viewed as a bad thing. I guess they really are rooting for America to fail.
     
  4. LIVEFRMNYC macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    #4
    I trust TMZ more than FOX. And that's not sarcasm.
     
  5. samiwas macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    #5
    It lost $10b after having gained some $30b in the last 18 months. Still up a ton. No doubt it will rise again.
     
  6. steve knight macrumors 68020

    steve knight

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    #6
    it is only a bad thing because oboma wanted it. that's the sad part hurt Americans and taxes because of spite.
     
  7. MrWillie macrumors 65816

    MrWillie

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2010
    Location:
    Starlite Starbrite Trailer Court
    #7

    It's not Fox News, it's Fox Business, but it's not really even Fox Business, it's an analyst on a show. Not necessarily to be taken literally. However, if someone had just invested in Walgreens, they took a loss.


    I believe you, and that's not a good thing. :rolleyes:
     
  8. roadbloc, Aug 8, 2014
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2014

    roadbloc macrumors G3

    roadbloc

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Location:
    UK
    #8
    I'm having hard time thinking how this is a bad thing. Or a good thing. Or even a thing.
     
  9. Southern Dad macrumors 65816

    Southern Dad

    Joined:
    May 23, 2010
    Location:
    Georgia
    #9
    It's only a bad thing if you are a stockholder of the company and wanted the company to save on taxes. Truthfully, very few people know what companies are now US companies or headquartered overseas. Think about it. How many owners of Dodge trucks know that Fiat owns Chrysler?
     
  10. VulchR macrumors 68020

    VulchR

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    #10
    Well, I personally think that there are some aspects of capitalism that should be destroyed. In any case, if the shareholders in Walgren's don't like this, then they can vote in new leadership for Walgren's. Besides, why should Fox express an opinion, unless perhaps a certain cranky old ******* who owns Fox also owns shares in Walgren's?
     
  11. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #11

    Oh please. They are basically one and the same. The overlap on their on-air talent makes me laugh. THey spin anti-Obama **** all day long. And Charles Payne is a host on Fox Business and guest hosts on FOX a lot.
     
  12. Arran macrumors 68040

    Arran

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2008
    Location:
    Atlanta, USA
    #12
    "Destroyed capitalism". So funny. It's like the Simpsons, but with real actors.
     
  13. Technarchy macrumors 603

    Technarchy

    Joined:
    May 21, 2012
    #13
    Destroyed capitalism?

    Not hardly. Certainly working within the framework of capitalism to make a business decision.

    Was shareholder value maximized? No, but that's not always a bad thing, as this myopic thinking has undone companies and certainly hurt the American economy as companies make bad ethical choices to chase the myth of year over year infinite growth, or the illusion of growth through outsourcing.
     
  14. G51989 macrumors 68030

    G51989

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Location:
    NYC NY/Pittsburgh PA
    #14
    The amount of money on they save on taxes is pretty small compared to what they would have lost if they started losing lots of business and profits.

    This is very true, however this is not the case, everyone knew about WalGreens in this case, and it pissed off a lot of people. On the right and the left, in the stereotypical suburban shopping mall where WalGreens does most of its business, theres lots of competional from big box stores like Kmarts, WalMarts, Sears, Supermarket chains, other drug store chains, local quick marks and drug stores. So it would be VERY easy for the average non informed consumer, who watches a little bit of the news to say " **** you WalGreens, Im going to the guys next store "

    That is what WalGreens is afraid of happening. Really bad public images have buried large companies before.

    Most people actually know that, it was pretty well covered in the press during the bailouts.

    I am in full support of it, because it means I can go buy an 4C next year.
     
  15. Southern Dad macrumors 65816

    Southern Dad

    Joined:
    May 23, 2010
    Location:
    Georgia
    #15
    Let's be honest, how much business would they have lost and for how long? Chrysler is owned by Fiat. Anyone refusing to buy a Chrysler because of it?
     
  16. colourfastt macrumors 6502a

    colourfastt

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    #16
    The 4C is an Alfa-Romeo.
     
  17. JoeG4 macrumors 68030

    JoeG4

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Location:
    Bay Area, Ca.
    #17
    I doubt it. When Chrysler and Mercedes had their "merger of equals" that was probably enough to scare off the silly people. So far Fiat has actually cared about the health of the company, and the cars have been a lot nicer in quality since.
     
  18. localoid macrumors 68020

    localoid

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Location:
    America's Third World
    #18
    According to this Autoweek article, even though its a wholly owned subsidiary of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA), Chrysler Group LLC is a Delaware LLC with its operations located in Michigan.
     
  19. Southern Dad macrumors 65816

    Southern Dad

    Joined:
    May 23, 2010
    Location:
    Georgia
    #19
    Honda Accords are built in Ohio and have domestic serial numbers. The company is actually American Honda Motor Company headquartered in California. Does anyone you know not think of Honda as a foreign car company?
     
  20. localoid macrumors 68020

    localoid

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Location:
    America's Third World
    #20
    Does Honda qualify as an American company under the Buy America Act? (Chrysler Group LLC seems to think it does.)
     
  21. vrDrew macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Location:
    Midlife, Midwest
    #21
    I think this sentence deserves some sort of medal.

    Because its hard for me to think of a better example of the sort of ridiculous, over-the-top exaggeration - coupled with a deep ignorance of the facts - that characterizes not just Fox News; but indeed much mass-market journalism these days. Fox being merely the leader of the pack of rabid dogs when it comes to yellow journalism.

    The purpose of journalism, and especially business or economics journalism, should be to relate not just the facts of a story, but to also put them in perspective, and explain what the ramifications will be to other parts of the economy.

    Fox Business' Charles Payne fails, utterly, on all counts. He cannot even get the basic facts straight: starting with the fact that it was Wal-Greens board of directors that made the decision. And it was a corporate decision based upon a very wide variety of facts - including the fact that WalGreens gets a large share of its US pharmacy business from US Government purchases.

    For Payne to suggest that this decision "destroyed capitalism" is so absurd as to beggar belief. If capitalism could survive two World Wars, a Great Depression, the Cold War, and the Great Recession - I think it'll survive WalGreens keeping its corporate home in suburban Chicago. What surprises me is that Fox News has so little respect, not only for the fundamental tenets of responsible journalism, but the basic intelligence of its audience.

    Fire Charles Payne today. It will be a good start.
     
  22. Sydde macrumors 68020

    Sydde

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    #22
    Obviously, Payne had a huge block of Walgreens stock in his portfolio.
     
  23. G51989 macrumors 68030

    G51989

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Location:
    NYC NY/Pittsburgh PA
    #23
    Whom are owned by FIAT.
     
  24. G51989 macrumors 68030

    G51989

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Location:
    NYC NY/Pittsburgh PA
    #24
    The purchases made by the US goverment, which has been stated by VDrew and in the artical, a pretty large share of their profits.

    For how long: Forever

    The board of directors made this call.

    Nope, maybe people are rushing to buy Chrysler products, who have seen their sales jump because Fiat did something that lots of car companies have been doing, they kicked the bean counters off the designing of cars and put engineers in charge. Honda has been doing it forever. Plus FIAT is a fairly well known and very innovative car company.

    There is a difference between " Handing over a car company to another car company that knows what its doing " and " A chain of drugstores going overseas to have all the benefits of doing business in America without contributing a dime.

    When you let bean counters control how a car is made, you end up with a GM situation.

    Bean Counter: This ignition switch is great! Its almost a whole dollar cheaper per car!

    Engineer: Yeah but we found a serious flaw in it that can cause steering wheels to lock and have a total loss of engine and breaking power

    Bean Counter: Almost a dollar!

    ----------

    They are a foreign car company with a branch of themselves based in the USA, however pretty much everyone knows they are built in America. Tho they aren't designed in America, and a decent amount of parts do come from Japan ( lots of engine internals and transmission parts, as well as the CV axles. )
     
  25. Southern Dad macrumors 65816

    Southern Dad

    Joined:
    May 23, 2010
    Location:
    Georgia
    #25
    Great post except you didn't have a clue what you were talking about. Do a little research and you will find out that the Honda Accord is one of the most American vehicle built here in the USA. All Accords have a 1, 4 or 5 as the first digit of the VIN, indicating they are domestic.

    Made in America: Most and Least American Cars - ABC News

    How Patriotic is Your Car - U.S. News Best Cars
     

Share This Page