GE Will Repay Government $3.8 Billion Tax Break

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by rdowns, Apr 13, 2011.

  1. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #1
    This is a fake press release that the AP published. How the hell can anyone take this seriously?
     
  2. CalBoy macrumors 604

    CalBoy

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    #2
    That's actually a good start, but it still doesn't address the fact that GE paid no taxes. They're just refunding their rebate, right?

    And they're only doing this because of the public shaming they got. Can we go one by one with the richest 1% and get them to pay their taxes this way too? Maybe then we wouldn't need to spend 5 weeks arguing about condoms. :rolleyes:
     
  3. samiwas macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
  4. IntelliUser macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2009
    Location:
    Why does it matter?
  5. AP_piano295 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2005
    #5
    Thank god for journalism.

    It's time for big corporations to start paying their share of the taxes. It would go a long way towards solving the current budget problems.

    EDIT: or not :(
     
  6. rdowns thread starter macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #6
    Seriously guys? Read my white text in my post.
     
  7. Mac'nCheese macrumors 68030

    Mac'nCheese

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2010
    #7
    Why did you hide that part like it was a spoiler for a movie?
     
  8. Capt Underpants macrumors 68030

    Capt Underpants

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2003
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    #8
    It sounded believable to me. I was really impressed with GE for a moment.
     
  9. chrmjenkins macrumors 603

    chrmjenkins

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2007
    Location:
    CA
    #9
    Fake press release in order to bring the issue into more awareness?
     
  10. macquariumguy macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2002
    Location:
    Sarasota FL
    #10
    Why would anyone suspect there was white text in the post?

    Frigging kids...
     
  11. samiwas macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    #11
    Ooooohhhh! RIGHT! The WHITE text! Why didn't I think to look at the white text on the white background? I almost always highlight the entire page looking for secret hidden missives. :p
     
  12. IntelliUser macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2009
    Location:
    Why does it matter?
  13. chrismacguy macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2009
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    #13
    Now that's a recovery from GE ;)
     
  14. rdowns thread starter macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #14
    Really?


    I guess my point was, like the AP, people don't read much beyond the headline and first paragraph.

    How can anyone buy into the statements quoted above?


    They shouldn't. They should question the PR and its language.
     
  15. AP_piano295 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2005
    #15
    We maintain an apparently worthless belief that people and corporations are theoretically capable of doing the right thing?

    If you don't have some hope it all just gets depressing at some point.
     
  16. Mac'nCheese macrumors 68030

    Mac'nCheese

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2010
    #16
    Two people fell for this. Two. It was debunked in the third post (including yours) of this thread.
     
  17. macquariumguy macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2002
    Location:
    Sarasota FL
    #17
    Or simply not trust anything you say from now on.
     
  18. rhsgolfer33 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    #18
    It's too bad the people that wrote the press release (and the entire NYT article that originated the GE stuff) don't understand that a deferred tax benefit =/= to a refund. Basically, a deferred tax benefit (or deferred tax asset) is a financial accounting concept - a deferred tax asset results from temporary differences in book (think financial statements) and tax accounting (think what goes on a tax return); if a company deducts something for financial accounting purposes, for instance, certain bad debts, but that deduction is not allowed for tax purposes today (and it will be in the future), a deferred tax asset will result (the company as basically prepaid taxes for financial accounting purposes). It is a concept that allows a company to accurately reflect future taxes - a deferred tax liability also exists.

    Sure, GE paid no federal corporate income tax this year, but they did pay taxes - payroll taxes and sale/use taxes (see the argument that is usually brought up when someone says 47% of American's paid no taxes). What GE is doing is perfectly legit and pretty much every multinational does it (including Apple, Dell, Microsoft, Google, Merck, Pfizer, etc.). Personally, I'd be pretty mad if a corporation I was a shareholder in didn't minimize its tax liability to the lowest possible amount within the law and with substantial authority for all its tax positions.

    If Americans deplore laws that enable tax avoidance, they should elect politicians that will change those laws - oh, that's right, the majority of politicians love tax avoidance and hire accountants to help them pay the least amount of tax legally required.
     
  19. ender land macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2010
    #19
    This.

    I have no interest in researching every article to verify it's actually a true story just because some people may play fun pranks and post fake articles without indicating they are such. And c'mon, so many legitimate articles are written just as poorly that article quality and consistency is a terrible way to evaluate an articles veracity.
     
  20. samiwas macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    #20
    I *AM* a shareholder in GE (my worst performing stock in the past two years; and it was given as a gift in childhood, not bought by me). And I still think that avoiding all tax by using loopholes and other such accounting tricks is deplorable. But then again, I'm not the "my money my money my money" type as much. I try to vote for the people I want to change the rules, but somehow, those Republican legislators just keep getting in the way.
     
  21. rhsgolfer33 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    #21
    What GE is using isn't really a loophole, it is widely popular, has been known about for ages by accountants and congress (hell, I have an entire class that focuses on the subject) and I really doubt that congress didn't know that corporations would keep foreign profits in foreign subs when they enacted the legislation. Some of GE's transfer pricing may be a little bit murkier, but the IRS has the authority to go in and change the pricing GE assigns to its transactions between controlled subs (see IRC section 482) - since the IRS hasn't done that, it is pretty likely GE is following the law in regards to the methods and pricing it uses (I mean, its not like the CEO of GE and Obama are buddy buddy - oh, wait).

    Don't blame just the Republicans, congressmen on the left use tax avoidance techniques - John Kerry certainly didn't mind doing it with his yacht, that is, until he was exposed to his colleagues who think paying the minimum tax required by law is somehow morally reprehensible.
     
  22. iJohnHenry macrumors P6

    iJohnHenry

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Location:
    On tenterhooks
    #22
    Of course members of Congress have all their investments in blind trusts.

    :rolleyes:
     
  23. AP_piano295 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2005
    #23
    Your right that we can't blame the republicans for this problem. It is certainly the fault of almost all of our politicians and the fact that they are undeniably in bed with big business in any number of ways.

    -They worked together
    -They received campaign donations
    -They received free vacations
    -They were in the same frat together :rolleyes:

    And I understand that what GE did was "legal" I still think it was wrong. Of course I doubt much is going to change. Note how little we've herd from congressmen/senators/our president about changing our system so these multi billion dollar corporations dont get off tax free. Its because both parties are beholden to these corporate entities :(.

    Sometimes it feels like the Democrats and Republicans are actually working together. The Democrats as rule fail to accomplish anything truly meaningful or progressive. The Republicans act so insane that they scare all the liberals into constantly voting for Democrats because were so scared of the alternative.

    The end result is that the ruling class in both parties seems to do whatever they want and they're are basically zero consequences.
     
  24. rhsgolfer33 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2006
    #24
    Good post and quite true.

    I do think GE should pay taxes, but as a tax accountant, I also understand GE trying to minimize its taxes - there really isn't any reason you should pay more than legally obligated to and GE certainly doesn't. I think the law should be changed so that GE and other corporations pay a proper amount of tax, but until it is, I support what GE does in minimizing its liability.

    I no longer vote for either party, I have no faith that either of them will accomplish any meaningful change when it comes to taxes and spending.
     

Share This Page