Google Street View publishes naked picture of her son, three, online

Discussion in 'Community Discussion' started by ChrisGonzales90, Jun 29, 2010.

  1. bov macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2007
    Location:
    San Francisco
    #2
    hahahaha well if let your son run around naked like that, that's just a chance you have to take!

    Big Brother Google Street View :p
     
  2. ChrisGonzales90 thread starter macrumors 6502a

    ChrisGonzales90

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Location:
    Hillsboro, Oregon USA.
    #3
    Still, Google's CEO, while he may apear to be enjoying it, needs to cut it out.
     
  3. Surely Guest

    Surely

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #4
    What's with the kid thing there chief?

    Ever heard of editing the title? Don't post the same thread twice.
     
  4. Mexbearpig macrumors 65816

    Mexbearpig

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2008
    Location:
    Here
    #5
    Where is he appearing to be enjoying it?
     
  5. Shyfty macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    #6
    Oooh... scaremongering!

    Yeah, get over it, Gonzales.
     
  6. appleguy123 macrumors 603

    appleguy123

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Location:
    15 minutes in the future
    #7
    So what does the news paper do? Report it giving a bigger potential for perverts to see it.
     
  7. Shyfty macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
    #8
    Exactly. The media has behaved more irresponsibly than Google as far as this is concerned.
     
  8. iBlue macrumors Core

    iBlue

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2005
    Location:
    London, England
    #9
    Big deal. A toddler's butt.

    I never would have seen it had mummy dearest not made such a big fuss. If she had any brains at all she should realize this would only call more attention to it. Or perhaps she did realize that and her motives are not as focused on her child's safety as she claims. Mountains out of molehills, as ever.
     
  9. ethical macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2007
    #10
    Any number of people could have walked past that house and seen the little kid running around, it's the mother's fault. It's not hard to get an image removed from street view, and involving the press (the Daily Mail *cringe*) just made the whole thing worse.
     
  10. Ttownbeast macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    May 10, 2009
  11. .Andy macrumors 68030

    .Andy

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Location:
    The Mergui Archipelago
  12. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
  13. heehee macrumors 68020

    heehee

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2006
    Location:
    Same country as Santa Claus
    #14
    What she said. :rolleyes:
     
  14. R94N macrumors 68020

    R94N

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    Location:
    UK
    #15
    Well, he was in the front garden. Everybody would've been able to see him anyway.
     
  15. benflick macrumors 68020

    benflick

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    #16
    Here's a shocking idea. Don't let your three year old run around completely naked.
    (To the mom): Ever heard of a swimsuit, dumbass?
     
  16. Macky-Mac macrumors 68030

    Macky-Mac

    Joined:
    May 18, 2004
    #17
    she says;

    and yet she lets her son run around naked in the front yard where paedophiles could see him :rolleyes:
     
  17. benflick macrumors 68020

    benflick

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    #18
    I know! What's worse, a pedophile looking at the kid on Google Maps, or a pedophile being there in real life? Both are bad, but still.:rolleyes:
     
  18. MattSepeta macrumors 65816

    MattSepeta

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2009
    Location:
    375th St. Y
    #19
    hide your kids!
     
  19. ethical macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2007
    #20
    I know! Last I checked paedophiles didn't scour google street view on the off chance of finding a naked kid... she's made the whole situation far worse.
     
  20. Rodimus Prime macrumors G4

    Rodimus Prime

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    #21
    the media is blowing this out of proportion. Google tends to remove and blur out objects like that very quickly once they have been notified by some one. They make it pretty easy to submit objectionable image from street view. A human will look at it and quickly correct it.
    It is like when their software misses a face or car licenses plate. As soon as they are told about it. It gets blurred out. If you want you house removed just requested it and they honor it. They do not require any back ground info. They make it really easy.

    I am going to guess that the image is completely removed from street view now and if not completely blurred out.
     
  21. yg17 macrumors G5

    yg17

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO

Share This Page