Has Apple Lost Its Security Shine?

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Sep 19, 2006.

  1. MacBytes macrumors bot

    Jul 5, 2003


    Category: Opinion/Interviews
    Link: Has Apple Lost Its Security Shine?
    Description:: With the latest large sets of security patches and an alleged wireless driver vulnerability, Mac OS X no longer seems invincible. Our expert delves into the real threats in the Apple world and outlines simple steps you can take to protect yourself.

    Posted on MacBytes.com
    Approved by Mudbug
  2. Cowinacape macrumors regular

    Jul 3, 2006
    Surrey B.C. Canada
    Wouldn't seem to be much of a news flash here, build it and some fool will hack it, if for no other reason that to say they can. Hopefully Apple can keep on top of things, better than Microsoft has.
  3. p0intblank macrumors 68030

    Sep 20, 2005
    New Jersey
    Does Mac OS X have any viruses at the moment? Exactly... nothing has changed. Holes are found; big deal. Apple usually fixes them within days.
  4. bousozoku Moderator emeritus

    Jun 25, 2002
    Gone but not forgotten.
    Mac OS X isn't as bad as Windows at its best, let alone its worst. Information Week has lost its mind.

    A specially-prepared system to allow cracking and this is a security problem for the 19 million active Mac OS X users?

    As far as security updates, there have been plenty and this is a good thing, especially since they're bundled. There is no confusion about what you need or how to get it or apply it--click to download and click to restart and apply.

    If Microsoft were to successfully fill all those security holes in their operating system, they'd have more than 3 digits' worth most likely. Add to that the fact that ActiveX is a security whole by design that will never be fixed and you've got a much bigger mess than Mac OS X will ever be at its worst.
  5. EricNau Moderator emeritus


    Apr 27, 2005
    San Francisco, CA
    HA HA HA! That's a good one.
  6. iJaz macrumors 6502a


    Dec 16, 2004
    Well, the article was ok. With a rubbish headline to catch people's interest.
  7. miniConvert macrumors 68040


    Mar 4, 2006
    Kent, UK - the 'Garden of England'.
    Until I get me a juicy piece of malware on OS X it's all rosey in my eyes.
  8. SPUY767 macrumors 68000


    Jun 22, 2003
    This is a good article. . .

    For me to poop on!
  9. Swarmlord macrumors 6502a


    Sep 18, 2006
    First, nothing is invincible. Having said that, I haven't found anything as secure and stable as Mac OS/X Tiger unless I count Solaris running on Sun hardware. Of course if a bunch of hackers set their mind to penetrating a vulnerability in a system - any system - they will eventually find a weakness to exploit. I think that Apple responds to any threats like this very quickly and I feel secure with my system even when browsing in unfamiliar waters.
  10. DWKlink macrumors regular

    Nov 18, 2003
    New York, NY
    Yeah, but

    Its only a matter of time before a big virus hits osx. I do believe that for the most part... but this article just seems off on so many points.

    Eg - was anything ever settled with that whole black hat security issue? I heard that rep steps were never made public - even to apple, and that the hack was done through a 3rd party usb wireless device. Who would put a 3rd party usb wireless device on their macbook that already comes standard with wireless support built-in (which cannot apparently be hacked). That black hat conference caused a whole lot of misunderstanding and bad press for apple... and it wasn't even an apple "problem" (i use the word problem very loosely since this hack hasn't even be shown to be legit.)
  11. Silencio macrumors 68020


    Jul 18, 2002
    John C. Welch is one of the smartest Mac writers out there. This article is pretty common sense, though it looks quite dumbed down by TechWeb's editors: something especially apparent in the assigned headline.
  12. Lixivial macrumors 6502a


    Jan 13, 2005
    Between cats, dogs and wanderlust.
    The only point you make about the article missing its mark is something they covered in the third paragraph:

    The article was dumbed down, yes, but I was one of those who submitted it to Macbytes because I found that it provided a good piece of very basic reference material for those among the community who believe they're invincible because they're on a Macintosh. Particularly the dialog box check, or have people forgotten that those can be spoofed?

    Unfortunately it was given a terrible headline to catch reader interest. I don't blame Welch for that or for dumbing it down, but rather CMP/TechWeb as Silencio suggested. Even still, I find it to be a valid piece of reference material for those basic users out there to follow.
  13. netdog macrumors 603


    Feb 6, 2006
    More rubbish from the PR Office in Redmond.

Share This Page