Have We "Lost" Freedoms Since Obama Has Taken Office

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by bobber205, Mar 16, 2010.

  1. bobber205 macrumors 68020

    bobber205

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2005
    Location:
    Oregon
    #1
    ITN asked me to start a thread on the subject so here it is.

    What makes this the funniest thing ever is the hard right doesn't seem to mind losing "freedoms" when it makes them "safer".

    Go ahead ITN. Make your ridiculous claims about the freedom's you've lost, are about to lose, and Obama's assault on the Constitution.

    This'll be comedy gold I'm sure. ;)
     
  2. yoyo5280 macrumors 68000

    yoyo5280

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia & Bay Area
    #2
    I saw thread title, I imagined troll, I read post, I lolled.
     
  3. bobber205 thread starter macrumors 68020

    bobber205

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2005
    Location:
    Oregon
    #3
    Shut up!

    Don't scare ITN away! ;)
     
  4. splitpea macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2009
    Location:
    Among the starlings
    #4
    Only those curtailed by the conservative-majority Supreme Court.
     
  5. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #6
    How fortuitous. I just got off the phone with Quinnipiac Polls; a nice long 25 minute survey. They happened to ask about whether or not we have lost any freedoms under the current and former Presidents.

    Was also asked about Democratic and Republicans parties, the House, Pelosi, Boehner, Senate, Reid, McConnell, Obama, Palin, Tea Party, health care, deficit reduction, Afghanistan and terrorism.
     
  6. renewed macrumors 68040

    renewed

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Location:
    Bemalte Blumen duften nicht.
    #7
    I'm assuming this doesn't apply here anymore.
     
  7. Gelfin macrumors 68020

    Gelfin

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2001
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    #8
    It does, but although the OPs tone was pretty caustic in the post you cite, there was no direct personal insult. He called the claim ridiculous. If you think the claim has merit, defend it and prove him wrong.
     
  8. .Andy macrumors 68030

    .Andy

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Location:
    The Mergui Archipelago
    #9
    edit: ^What an intelligent point you make ;).

    I would have thought there is quite a difference between a personal attack i.e. calling inthenet ridiculous, and calling claims ridiculous.

    That said the OP is a tad baiting and aggressive in my opinion. Could be toned down and not be directed at anyone in particular and we might get some better discussion.
     
  9. renewed macrumors 68040

    renewed

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Location:
    Bemalte Blumen duften nicht.
    #10
    Just seems baited (as .Andy said) to me. Doesn't seem like much of a thread, other than trying to provoke a particular user. If ITN had claimed in another thread that we have lost freedoms under Obama then why doesn't the OP counter that claim in that thread?

    Why start another thread, calling out one user, and not even back your stance with a claim or facts?
     
  10. .Andy macrumors 68030

    .Andy

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Location:
    The Mergui Archipelago
    #11
    It was actually done at inthenet's request.

     
  11. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #12
    Stick around and it will become quite clear.

    ITN claims we have lost freedoms under Obama in a post. When asked to name them, he tells you it's not on topic for that thread. :rolleyes:

    Thus, you have this thread.

    EDIT: I'll be awaiting the diatribe on his 'assault on the constitution'.
     
  12. renewed macrumors 68040

    renewed

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Location:
    Bemalte Blumen duften nicht.
    #13
    I see... alright well back on thread topic. Proceed. :p
     
  13. Peace macrumors Core

    Peace

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Location:
    Space--The ONLY Frontier
    #14
    I have one.

    I have lost the freedom to go to a rally in Washington D.C and not see a bunch of crazies yielding guns.

    There. That should start this one going eh ? :D
     
  14. IntheNet macrumors regular

    IntheNet

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    #15
    It is not bobber205's fault here; mine entirely. I did not want to hijack other thread with side discussion on Obama's rush to deny rights... I probably should have prefaced that request...

    Here's a few... I'll add more later... this is my opinion in response to your request:

    1. Freedom from Debt. (denial underway) - Obama has continued the prior president's reckless assault to extend public debt (now:$12,640,950,801,103.62) and indenture the next generation to debt servitude. "The estimated population of the United States is now 308,020,639, so each citizen's servitude share of this debt is $41,039.30."

    2. Freedom to Question my Government. (denial underway) - Obama has urged his surrogates to refer to legal protests, within Tea Party gatherings, as "angry mobs" with full castigation from the White House Press Secretary and demeaned and belittled any public sentiment against the administration.

    3. Freedom of Religious Rights of doctors/health care providers to refuse to perform abortions (denial in progress). - Obama seeks to rescind the "conscience rule" protecting doctors/health care workers who refuse to participate in abortions or other medical procedures that go against their moral and religious beliefs.

    4. Freedom of Review. (denial in progress) - Obama has denied Congressional review of close Presidential appointments; specifically he has perverted the appointment of White House czars without Congressional oversight (more than 50 now not subject to any Congressional oversight,). “As Presidential assistants and advisors, these White House staffers are not accountable for their actions to the Congress, to cabinet officials, and to virtually anyone but the President. In too many instances, White House staff have been allowed to inhibit openness and transparency, and reduce accountability.” (Democrat Senator Robert Byrd on presidential czars).

    5. Freedom of Speech (various entities impacted underway) - Obama's Justice Department issuance of gag order on health insurance providers (Humana Health Insurance, et al.) to detail insurance provision information.

    6.Freedom to Work (denial in progress) - The U.S. has lost between 2.5 to 4.1 million jobs since President Barack Obama took office.

    7. Freedom of Information (denial in progress) - despite making a claim to make government more open and transparent, Obama has refused to run an open government. "In fiscal year 2009, 17 major governmental agencies refused to release information, claiming legal exemptions, 466,872 times, an increase of nearly 50 percent from the previous year, according to a review of requests conducted by the Associated Press."

    8. Freedom from Fear (denial in progress) - despite coming to office with Homeland Security apparatus in place to fight the War on Terror, Obama has endangered Americans by mirandizing fanatical Muslim terrorists, threatened to close Guantanamo Detention Facility and bring foreign terrorists to this nation to threaten citizens, rolled back European missile defense, and curtailed key defense programs that provide national security.
     
  15. obeygiant macrumors 68040

    obeygiant

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Location:
    totally cool
    #16
    A tad? It is baiting. @bobber205 Why start a thread in this manner? Instead of taunting, pose a serious question.


    Anyway, could massive debt be considered a loss of freedom?
    Otherwise I don't feel any different.
     
  16. rdowns macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #17
    Nice screed. Now, you were saying about he constitution?
     
  17. .Andy macrumors 68030

    .Andy

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Location:
    The Mergui Archipelago
    #18
    Did you expect anything but vague politicking :D!
     
  18. Peterkro macrumors 68020

    Peterkro

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Location:
    Communard de Londres
  19. plinden macrumors 68040

    plinden

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2004
    #20
    Job losses per month, Jan 08 to Nov 09
    [​IMG]
     
  20. bobber205 thread starter macrumors 68020

    bobber205

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2005
    Location:
    Oregon
    #21
    I've started a thread on this matter in the way I did because ITN is always telling us to do it so he won't "go off topic", though he loves doing that when it's done by his own hand.

    I am happy that he at least responded. Though none of the things he claimed are losses of "Freedom". He said assault on the Constitution but none of them seem like that kind of attack. More like stuff he doesn't like that's happened.
     
  21. Don't panic macrumors 603

    Don't panic

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Location:
    having a drink at Milliways
    #22
    amended for clarity:
     

    Attached Files:

  22. renewed macrumors 68040

    renewed

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2009
    Location:
    Bemalte Blumen duften nicht.
    #23
    Ok.. all that shows is the amount of jobs being lost per month, it doesn't show the amount of unemployment going down.
     
  23. bobertoq macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
  24. Don't panic macrumors 603

    Don't panic

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Location:
    having a drink at Milliways
    #25
    are you for real?
    you don't discern a trend in that graph?
     

Share This Page