Hillary Clinton: Anyone other than Trump would have been indicted for obstruction

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by jkcerda, Apr 24, 2019.

  1. jkcerda macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #1
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hi...QarMJ5fivCEtOe66lF1ZlTk9PbPXCuA77Bne2T8FHiOZI
    said the woman whose husband met with the AG on an airport , same DOJ who told the FBI to basically let things go https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/obama-doj.2177986/
     
  2. mgguy macrumors 6502

    mgguy

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2006
    #2
    Have to admit, she does have balls (figuratively speaking).
     
  3. raqball macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2016
    #3
    That's cute... Considering anyone other than Clinton would have been thrown in the slammer lickidy split for bashing evidence and wiping servers clean of evidence...
     
  4. yaxomoxay macrumors 68040

    yaxomoxay

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Location:
    Texas
    #4
  5. linuxcooldude macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    #5
    She was also never mentioned in regards to possibly breaking campaign finance laws twice (Ukraine/Russia) for opposition research.
     
  6. ucfgrad93 macrumors P6

    ucfgrad93

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Colorado
    #6
    Agreed. The hubris of the Clintons knows no bounds.
     
  7. appleisking macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    May 24, 2013
  8. samcraig macrumors P6

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Location:
    USA
  9. yaxomoxay macrumors 68040

    yaxomoxay

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Location:
    Texas
    #9
    So is she saying that the Honorable Mueller is biased?
     
  10. jkcerda thread starter macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #10
    thought you agreed with Mueller's report?
     
  11. samcraig macrumors P6

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Location:
    USA
    #11
    I accept the report. It's a strawman to imply or set up some fake argument that because I accept the report it means that Hillary is wrong in her comment or that Mueller is biased.

    It's not as if Mueller is the only person who can indict.
     
  12. jkcerda thread starter macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #12
    shes wrong for the simple fact she was not indicted herself.........at the request of Obama's DOJ no less.
     
  13. Night Spring macrumors G5

    Night Spring

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    #13
    Is there a campaign finance law saying you shouldn't do opposition research?
     
  14. eatrains macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    #14
    I love how conservatives are still so obsessed with Hilary.
     
  15. Bug-Creator macrumors 6502a

    Bug-Creator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2011
    Location:
    Germany
    #15
    Dunno, did Mueller rule out that Trump obstructed or that that obstruction was below the threshold for indictment?
     
  16. linuxcooldude macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    #16
    Its been brought up in Trumps camp that getting Russian sources ( Trump Jr. meeting with Russian at Trump Tower ) for oppo research would violate campaign laws because it's getting some thing of value from a foreign entity, even though not monetary in nature.

    Mueller report goes into this and even mentions Hilary as she's done the same thing. But Mueller dismissed this as campaign finance violation as possibly intent was needed and/or disagreement with what a "Thing of value" means and how much and has never been tried in a court of law.
     
  17. ericgtr12 macrumors 65816

    ericgtr12

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2015
    #17
    Dems are too busy laughing at all of those who screamed "lock her up" either currently sitting in a jail cell or under indictment. Want to talk about balls? Every single Trump supporter still bashing Hillary while giving Trump a free pass as a HUGE set on them.
     
  18. jkcerda thread starter macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #18
    congrats on exonerating trump, he was just doing opposition research & this was just a witch hunt............
     
  19. yaxomoxay macrumors 68040

    yaxomoxay

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Location:
    Texas
    #19
    Either way, your own statements would make what Hillary said wrong (that is, that "anyone other than Trump would have been indicted).
     
  20. ericgtr12 macrumors 65816

    ericgtr12

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2015
    #20
    It's fair to say that "most" under trump have been. And how many under Hillary (or Hillary herself) have been?
     
  21. jkcerda thread starter macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #23
    hence the reason she is wrong, she was NOT indicted after Obama's DOJ stepped in.
     
  22. raqball macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2016
    #24
  23. vrDrew macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Location:
    Midlife, Midwest
    #25
    She's not saying that Mueller is biased.

    Mueller's legal reasoning is based on long-standing Justice Department policy that a sitting President cannot be indicted on criminal charges. When she said "anyone other than Trump", she could have said "anyone other than the President" would have been indicted, had they taken the actions that Trump did. And she is correct.

    And no: Meeting the Attorney General on an airport tarmac does not, absent other factors, add up to Obstruction of Justice. Bill Clinton, as a former President, was in no position to threaten or otherwise coerce the then AG. Moreover, there is no indication from Lynch that the topic of the investigation in Clinton's e-mail server even came up.

    Some of the Trump apologists really need to take a dose of reality pills.
     

Share This Page

31 April 24, 2019