How does a Country Become Great?

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by Huntn, Jul 8, 2014.

  1. Huntn macrumors G5

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #1
    Is it through a strong economy where most citizens benefit and a strong central authority or is it through a libertarian, every man for himself, weak central authority?

    Think about of the countries in history regarded as the greatest, did any of them have weak central authority? And who may very well take over the U.S. in the economic, research and development fields? Who has great amounts of revenue to spend on infrastructure? China. Not to imply that China has no upcoming issues, environmental hazards, lax regulation, growing health problems, rising wages, and others I can't currently think of.

    What's the point of this post? I don't think that countries become great when segments of society try to neuter central authority, starve it, when citizens try to achieve affuency on their own, fail to hold the common good as a high priority, and revenues are not high enough to accomplish much of anything. It's a recipe for failure IMO.
     
  2. Renzatic Suspended

    Renzatic

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Location:
    Gramps, what the hell am I paying you for?
    #2
    Historically, a country is considered great when it's projection of power and influence is at it's peak, and its population is prosperous. These are things normally fostered by a strong centralized form of government.
     
  3. G51989 macrumors 68030

    G51989

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Location:
    NYC NY/Pittsburgh PA
    #3
    Indeed, and America has peaked if we are talking about America, it reached its peak of power and prosperity, its all downhill from here.

    ----------

    No

    China is a big one, and is an upcoming superpower.

    The other place you want ot look at to overtake the US of A more than it already has is the EU.
     
  4. McGiord, Jul 8, 2014
    Last edited: Jul 8, 2014

    McGiord macrumors 601

    McGiord

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2003
    Location:
    Dark Castle
    #4
    It's all relative. Great to whom? Define great.

    For example, in my opinion a company is great when it treats really nicely all their employees, as well as their suppliers, customers and competitors without killing anyone, provides great products and services and makes enough money to satisfy their stakeholders and invest into new products and services.

    If we try to extrapolate this to a country, it's a little complicated as there is a big caveat that a private company is very selective to hire the diverse talent it needs to operate, develop and expand.

    In my opinion the US is still the best balance when compared with any other country.

    Records from the past are highly biased on how history was written and who is reading it.

    A country has so many aspects to cover that it cannot be perfect for all of them.

    A common good could be fatal if the population has poor education, ethics, and values.
    Very large populations are difficult to manage no matter what system is used.

    Let's imagine that you are tasked to create a new country, and try to be "realistic": where in the world will you place it? How big would it be? With how many people will you start it? What official language? Currency? Political system? Economy? Taxes? Constitution? Armed forces? Key legislation to enable economical development? What would be your initial budget? Immigration policies? Education system? Health system? Infrastructure? Transportation? Development? Trade agreements? etc...
     
  5. Renzatic Suspended

    Renzatic

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Location:
    Gramps, what the hell am I paying you for?
    #5
    Not necessarily. Every nation has its periods of want and plenty. While I won't argue that we're far from living our proudest moments, things aren't so terrible that a complete decline is an inevitability.
     
  6. McGiord macrumors 601

    McGiord

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2003
    Location:
    Dark Castle
    #6
    I kind of disagree that China is as great as many think. I think that their population is not always happy, and will never be when they have limitations on the quantity of descendants they can have. The levels of toxicity and pollution will always take a toll on their population. Once they reach a critical mass of middle class population there might be another revolution unless they change certain things.
    The currency value is strongly manipulated (many countries and its internal economy rely on it). Even they own other countries debts, they also depend on them.
    I wildly guess that there are plenty of chinese people out of China, and certainly they know their ways to make more money and grow their businesses.
    It's a great market for the next centuries to come.
     
  7. localoid macrumors 68020

    localoid

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Location:
    America's Third World
    #7
    According to the Good Country Index, Ireland is the overall greatest country in the world.

     
  8. Huntn thread starter macrumors G5

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #8
    I was thinking of a country capable of amassing enough wealth to do big, but good things for humanity. In the past certain countries have stood out, for their wealth and ability to project power and have/had a major impact on the development of humanity. Of course we could eventually morph into a real world government, but until then it is usually smaller units, like the US, EU who can coordinate maybe effectively, projects for the common good.

    Consider humanity's future, space, if we want to have a future, we've got to get into space, at least that is my impression. Who is going to have the money to do this? It won't be little rag tag groups of Libertarians* mostly concerned with individual liberty. It will be societies who can pull together for the common good, "us" vs "me". Right now, I don't see that in the US. I see it becoming all about "me".

    *the purpose of this thread is not to attack Libertarians per see. ;)


    As I said in my original post, they will face a reckoning, but in the mean time they are loaded with $$ and are in a position to do big things for good or for bad. Bottom line, it takes a strong central authority, while acknowledging that is a double edged sword. A BAD central authority, one who's intentions are malevolent can be a nightmare.

    Interesting. This is good although I would not classify Ireland as great within the context of this discussion.
     
  9. impulse462 Suspended

    impulse462

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2009
    #9
    When the people living in it have high influence in science, literature, and art and use their influences to further their country in various forms of innovation.
     
  10. G51989 macrumors 68030

    G51989

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Location:
    NYC NY/Pittsburgh PA
    #10
    In America it is the other way around, the ignorant, meek and stupid run the show.
     
  11. jkcerda Suspended

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #11
    Wonderful whites of west Virginia
    Honey Boo boo
    the Crapdashians
    Buck Wild
    Teen Mom
    Jersey Shore
    Jerry Springer
    Maury Povich
    assorted singers
    ALL "news" channels with regurgitated one sided "news".

    Americans LOVE to glorify stupidity.
    the NEW "American dream" is to be screwed up enough to on your own "reality" show. people are moving from the entertainment of a train wreck to wanting to BE that type of "entertainment" .

    only way I am going to make it out of the U.S is if I hit the lotto. Canada /France would be places I would like to visit & perhaps consider staying.
     
  12. impulse462 Suspended

    impulse462

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2009
    #12
    I don't engage in any of that stuff, but I don't mind nor do I judge people who do. But do you think the fact that its so prevalent is why American is going "downhill?"

    For example, I have 2 friends who used to watch Jersey Shore, but they knew it was just this reality BS kind of show. Both are smart and have promising careers already, but they still watched it just in their spare time. Do you think they are in the majority or minority?
     
  13. Huntn, Jul 9, 2014
    Last edited: Jul 9, 2014

    Huntn thread starter macrumors G5

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #13
    It feels that way.

    I find it interesting that the GOP speaks frequently of starving the Federal Govt, in essence neutering it. But I think the real agenda is fighting off the liberals, then seizing control for a strong central authority that they approve of. This is the double edged sword I referred to. Could the reverse argument be made? Absolutely. It all boils down to what kind of authority you want to be subject to.
     
  14. jnpy!$4g3cwk macrumors 65816

    jnpy!$4g3cwk

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    #14
  15. jkcerda Suspended

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #15
    hard to say, they are contributing to glorifying stupidity by watching the shows.
    stupidity pays big time
    http://okmagazine.com/get-scoop/can-you-guess-how-much-cast-teen-mom-2-makes/
    all of this crap is in your face at the super markets, tons of tabloids out there pushing the fecal matter into every one, things are not as simple as changing the channel when you are stuck at the register & you glance over the headlines. how many "teens" are STUPID enough to think they can get their own show?
    http://www.projectcasting.com/casti...on-mtvs-teen-mom-mtv-teen-mom-3-casting-call/

    the level of stupid pushed on the population is amazing.
     
  16. jnpy!$4g3cwk macrumors 65816

    jnpy!$4g3cwk

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    #16
    I must be completely misunderstanding you.

    I have never heard Richard Mellon Scaife or the Koch brothers being called "meek and stupid" -- they would be insulted, and rightly so.

    Extremely selfish and very short-sighted, sure. But, just because they were/are so good at manipulating meek and stupid voters doesn't mean that they themselves are.
     
  17. aerok macrumors 65816

    aerok

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    #17
    A nation becomes great by following:

    - The wise social words of Plato
    - Follow the advices of John Maynard Keynes
    - Apply the Tommy Douglas model
    - Fill in the blanks with teachings from Niccolò Machiavelli
     
  18. G51989 macrumors 68030

    G51989

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Location:
    NYC NY/Pittsburgh PA
    #18
    Oh, the Meet/stupid are the show.

    People like the Kochs run behind the scenes ;)
     
  19. palmerc2 macrumors 65816

    palmerc2

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #19
    I've never once looked at the daily life of a worker in China and think "gee, I want to live there". I'm sure many of them are anxious to move to America. But wait, they have to jump through a lot of hoops because it's a communist country. Oh you want to have more than one kid? Lol nope.

    They're living the dream!
     
  20. McGiord macrumors 601

    McGiord

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2003
    Location:
    Dark Castle
    #20
    There have to be a balance between "me" and "us". The difficulty is the definition of "us", is it "us" that we have common interests and a way of approaching live, or "us" where diversity is one key element.

    Diversity is a difficult thing, as the more the merrier is not always the case, and trying to please everyone requires a lot of sacrifices in the way we are used to live, specially if our differences are significant to generate a conflict that cannot be resolved unless the resolution is no deal or lose something.

    In countries like India, for example, they were united by the british empire, and as of today it's one of the most diverse countries with all their different ethnic groups, for the rest of the world they are all "indians", but they have so many differences.
    I was there once due to work, and reading the newspaper in the hotel where I was staying I capture some interesting news, they were running the electoral campaign for the next governor of the Maharashtra state, to my surprise there where 3 candidates from the same political party running in parallel and they were not primaries, their campaign was based similar things:
    1- Promoting why the other candidates were worse options
    2- None mentioned any reason why they should be the next governor
    3- Commonly they promise implementing laws to prevent "immigration" from other states to take over the local jobs (like they will be illegal workers)

    Another interesting and shocking thing I read in the same newspaper was an analysis of a nuclear war between India and Pakistan. It mentioned that if Pakistan used all its bombs they will hit 7 key cities and about 1.5 million people will die, on the other hand it India used all their arsenal they could wipe Pakistan (the whole country) out of the map. The conclusion of the article was something like: in this scenario India could solve a couple issues completely elimating the risk from Pakistan for the future of India and reducing their population in overly populated cities.

    Again I still believe that in the USA, there is still a great balance between all different aspects of life. Obviously there are states and cities where this is not the case, but overall there are great places where you can develop a fruitful life without suffering or making someone else suffer.

    If you are preoccupied based on what you read and watch over the mass media you will be overwhelmed. It is better to stay occupied with the things that matter to you and your close people, certainly in your community you can get engaged into anything to make it better in way that are not even possible in most of the other countries.

    If something exists in the world it is available in the US, you can either buy it or make it, sale it. Also it's one of the few places where you can dedicate your life to do the things that you like and make money, this is very difficult in other countries.

    Good things happen and many times they are overlooked.
     
  21. McGiord macrumors 601

    McGiord

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2003
    Location:
    Dark Castle
    #21
    Today I noticed this game Democracy 3 in the App Store, interesting to simulate how to run a country.

    Any one of you playing it?

    Its price is kind of steep unless it really is a cool game. The main review there is kind of discouraging, but there are many 5 stars too.
     

    Attached Files:

  22. Eraserhead macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #22
    De-facto everyone here (and in the US) has a limit on the number of kids they can have. It's probably ~3 for me, but I'm much richer than the average Chinese person.

    Except that they've been better governed that our Western democracies.

    The Chinese currency has strengthened substantially. It's not so weak anymore.
     
  23. McGiord macrumors 601

    McGiord

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2003
    Location:
    Dark Castle
    #23
    Everyone meaning all the people? The quantity is not limited in most of the countries, that some people choose not to have more kids is another thing, at the end it is each individual decision what to do about it. Other countries suffer the opposite they have too many people for the resources available to most of them (the country may have plenty of resources but they are not well invested for positively impacting their population).

    Can you please elaborate on what are the specific good things that China had done and is doing to improve the environmental and fix their pollution situation?

    About the currency, I mean that it is manipulated, if it becomes too strong it would not be attractive anymore for their foreign customers.
    In Brazil for example one of their struggles is when their currency gets stronger their exports significantly suffer.

    Anyone has a good source (website) with data for comparison?
     
  24. Huntn thread starter macrumors G5

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #24
    Could you summarize?

    The Chinese are coming from a different place. The average Chinese worker is not as well off as the average Western citizen (my impression) but in the last 40 years they have seen their prospects rise substantially. As I said previously, they will face a reckoning with pollution, but if they as a group hold "we" as a higher priority then "me", they will prevail in the long run. Are there excessively wealthy and powerful people in China? Based on corruption, I assume so.

    In the US, if the relatively few who hold power and excessive wealth continue to press their advantage, I feel there will be a substantial backlash to what result, it's hard to speculate.

    I agree that a balance must maintained. The rest of your post rambles a bit. :)
     
  25. Eraserhead, Jul 11, 2014
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2014

    Eraserhead macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #25
    It effectively is limited as only a tiny proportion of the population earns enough to have more than a small number of children and those families that exceed that limit get massive state subsidies for their kids which no one likes and those kids land up with substantial disadvantages in later life. I also agree that the de facto limit here of 2-3 kids is higher than China and that people can stretch themselves a bit, but it isn't really acceptable/possible to have more kids than that and give them a reasonable chance in life without being very rich.

    Having the worlds longest high speed rail network, massive expansion of urban transport, massive investment in solar, massive tree planting programs, requiring cars to meet European emissions standards (albeit not the absolute latest ones).
     

Share This Page