The 460 better than the nividia 960m, how is that weak compared to their last gen series?From what I have seen, its a difference of 5-7 FPS in games. And not much of a difference when it comes to GPU rendering. The big issue here, is that the 455 and 460 are newer generation for amd, but are still pretty weak compared to Nvidia's last gen 9XXm series.
I honestly prefer the Iris 550, or the Iris 580 if they used it in the 15".
Because majority of the competitors in the same price range use the 965m, which the 460 is 15-20% weaker than.The 460 better than the nividia 960m, how is that weak compared to their last gen series?
You mean gaming laptops? The main competitor to the macbook pro would be the xps 15 which uses the 960mBecause majority of the competitors in the same price range use the 965m, which the 460 is 15-20% weaker than.
Plus it's only a $90 difference to upgrade. It makes more sense.I went with the 460 mainly because of the 4GB vs 2GB VRAM difference (I use an external 4K monitor).
The 460 better than the nividia 960m, how is that weak compared to their last gen series?
And so what? 965M uses almost twice as much power as Pro 460 radeonBecause majority of the competitors in the same price range use the 965m, which the 460 is 15-20% weaker than.