IBT: Clinton Foundation Investigation Update: Key Details About Financial And Political Dealings

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by Jess13, Aug 24, 2016.

  1. Jess13 Suspended

    Jess13

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2013
    #1

    Clinton Foundation Investigation Update: Key Details About Financial And Political Dealings

    http://www.ibtimes.com/political-ca...-update-key-details-about-financial-political

    The release of documents shedding more light on connections between the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton-led State Department has touched off a new political firestorm only weeks before voters begin heading to the polls in the 2016 election.

    Republican nominee Donald Trump — himself a foundation donor — has called for a special prosecutor to investigate the foundation, and Trump’s running mate, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, has said the new disclosures are “evidence of the pay-to-play politics.” By contrast, the Clinton campaign has argued that there is no proof of any quid pro quo — a message echoed by her supporters in the pundit world.

    As the rhetoric about the Clintons’ public and private financial dealings intensifies, here is a brief review of the major investigative reporting that has been done about the Clinton Foundation.

    [continue]
     
  2. Robisan macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2014
    #2
    IOW nothing new here. Just another tired spammy thread on the topic.

    Mods feel free to merge or Wasteland at will.
     
  3. Jess13 thread starter Suspended

    Jess13

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2013
    #3
    No, it’s clear-cut pay-to-play and influence peddling layed out inarguably. Which, is why you’re so afraid of the information that you feel it necessary to alert the moderators to, what you hope, is the hiding of it.
     
  4. 1458279 Suspended

    1458279

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Location:
    California
    #4
    It's a joke to think that Obama would act on this. The good news is that it's becoming a trending topic and even PBS and others are being forced to cover it. They gave a pass in the DNC email leak by pushing Russia into the headlines.

    The MO is to flood the net with other stories. They found the UC Davis mace cover up costs $175,000.00 as they tried to cover their tracks by hiding this from the people. Nothing like a university teaching people how a government can take away your right to know.

    They've got Google and other tech hiding things from people.

    Can't say it'll make a difference, Hillary supporters won't change their minds no matter what happens.

    Look at the comments on this link and you'll see how the Left doesn't like a coverup from the Left when it's against them. I wonder if they feel the same way about Hillary.

    http://petapixel.com/2016/04/16/uc-davis-allegedly-spent-175k-erase-pepper-spray-photos-web/
    UC Davis Spent $175,000 to Scrub Infamous Pepper Spray Photos from the Web
     
  5. Jess13 thread starter Suspended

    Jess13

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2013
    #5
     
  6. 1458279 Suspended

    1458279

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Location:
    California
    #6
    That's sad, IDK him, but if what he says is true and the media doesn't cover it, that's just unreal.

    Many are saying that the access _IS_ the quo, and that certainly seems the case. It's interesting that the Clintons are now saying they'll stop what they are doing or change what they are doing _IF_ Hillary becomes president so that it won't be improper.
    How would it be improper for a President and NOT improper for a SOS? It's either improper or it's not.
     
  7. Snoopy4 macrumors 6502a

    Snoopy4

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2014
    #7
    Clinton is dirtier than a hooker on nickel day. God this stuff is making me ill.
     

Share This Page