Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

GD0X

Guest
Original poster
Mar 20, 2011
97
0
Poking fun at those who can't wait for the next revision.

Future native windows compatibility would be cool :p
 

smiddlehurst

macrumors 65816
Jun 5, 2007
1,228
30
Well played OP, well played.

That said... it's an interesting question in some ways. If the rumours are right and we get a Retina display, better camera, improved processor etc with the iPad 3, well, what's left to do? I really struggle to think what might make me upgrade to be honest. A new form factor would be cool but personally I love the existing design and can't really think what you'd do to make it significantly better (other than a weight reduction I guess). Improved SOC is a given but you need software to take advantage of that power so waiting a cycle isn't necessarily a bad thing.

Might just be me of course but I can't think of any must-have addition that I'd say was missing from the line (again, assuming the iPad 3 matched the rumours).
 

KylePowers

macrumors 68000
Mar 5, 2011
1,688
197
This would be my guess for the iPad 4:
  • 128GB version (doubt we'll see this in the iPad 3)
  • Quad-core CPU (the OS just isn't particularly designed for it yet)
  • 1.5GB of RAM (doubt it'd go all the way to 2GB, might even stay at 1GB)
  • 802.11ac
  • Some slightly updated variant of Bluetooth (Bluetooth 4.1, etc)
  • Slightly better cameras
  • Battery life equal to or slightly better than the iPad 3
  • New 30-pin dock connector (smaller; probably will debut w/ the 2012 iPhone first)
  • Same Retina display (but perhaps better/more efficient backlight)
  • Probably same form-factor (maybe thinner/lighter, no home button)
And yup, that's my prediction :D ... I'd personally love for it to integrate into a Macbook Air of sorts (like a Transformer Prime) and I think Apple could do it perfectly. I'd also want a pressure sensitive stylus for taking notes, etc as capacitive touchscreen styli just aren't that great (I've tried plenty of 'em)
 

Lukeyy19

macrumors 6502a
Feb 16, 2010
771
3
England, UK
NO iPAD 4.... We'll die 21/12-12... Apple knows! :apple:

429137_308172025902891_262576183795809_787535_992339286_n.jpg
 

MythicFrost

macrumors 68040
Mar 11, 2009
3,940
38
Australia
Haha thanks for the laugh OP.
This would be my guess for the iPad 4:
  • Quad-core CPU (the OS just isn't particularly designed for it yet)
Actually, the OS is very designed for it. It's reasonably easy to take advantage of multiple cores, and you've been able to do so since iOS 3, but iOS 4 introduced GCD which is great, and I think iOS 5 has even more APIs for such things. That aside, many tasks like resource loading benefit from multiple cores.

Overall I think a high clock speed dual-core Cortex A15 will be far more useful than a quad-core Cortex A9, or better yet a high clock quad-core A15... ah, I can see it now :D
 
Last edited:

sartios

macrumors member
Mar 1, 2012
90
0
London
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A406 Safari/7534.48.3)

You actually believe that we are going to die then? You are more silly than the myth of it !
 

d0vr

macrumors 6502a
Feb 24, 2011
603
1
Good titles deserve genuine answers!

I'd like to see Apple branded cloud computing - an extreme upgrade to Siri!
 

Ladybug

macrumors 68000
Apr 13, 2006
1,874
1,013
I actually like the name iPad HD... or how about iPad Pro? I think the numbering scheme is getting old. :)

iPad 4 should bring me breakfast in bed.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.