Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

DND82

macrumors member
Original poster
Jun 23, 2003
69
0
After strolling around NYC after work to get a nano, I eventually ended up in Tekserve. Ofcourse they were sold out of the 4GB black, the one I wanted. I talked to someone working there that bought one and he said the nano uses volatile memory. Can anyone confirm this???
 
whoa i hope it doesn't. volatile memory destroys my Pocket PC. i just cant risk the battery going empty on me so i rarely use it away from a power supply.

why would it be volatile though? what's Apple's thinking behind it, i mean are there any benefits?
 
correct me if i'm wrong... is volatile memory memory that loses its data when the battery goes dead? i've seen some digital cameras like this (cheap) and i can't imagine apple would make an ipod with one. especially why they would start doing this with their second flash-based ipod, since they could've done it w/ the shuffle.
 
DND82 said:
Don't get me wrong. I think it would be crazy for Apple to pull off such a move.
How about we all go to Paris and ask Steve Jobs about that at the Q&A session? :p He'll clear things up...
 
maya said:
...as Steve Jobs has a mental "Melt Down," with the error message "System Crash." Trying to clear this one up. ;) :)
Not "System Crash." but rather: "Kernel Panic... we're hanging here." :D
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.