iPod touch iPod Touch capacity is way too low

[Jim on the Wall]

For $50 less, you can get an iPod with ten times the capacity.

 

[clevin]

For $50 less, you can get an iPod with ten times the capacity.

I strongly suggest people stop treating iPod touch as a traditional iPod, A.K.A. a music/video player.

 

[r.d]

For $50 less, you can get an iPod with ten times the capacity.

Couldn't agree more. They should've made the iPod touch hard drive based and a bit thicker. Now I have to buy the iPod classic along with an iPhone.

 

[Phobophobia]

I wouldn't be surprised if iPod Touch became the best-selling iPod.

 

[steamboat26]

For $50 less, you can get an iPod with ten times the capacity.

I don't think that the iPod Classic and iPod touch are designed to cater to the same market. The Classic is for the people who still like the click wheel, and have a massive library of music. The iPod touch is seemingly designed to cater to the market that wants a multifuction device, which is seen in the fact that it has Safari and Youtube.

 

[Jim on the Wall]

I strongly suggest people stop treating iPod touch as a traditional iPod, A.K.A. a music/video player.

Yeah, stupid me. Of course iPods aren't meant to be used for music and videos...



No matter how you spin it, ten times the capacity for a cheaper price is a major deterrent (7 episodes of Lost and 1600 songs alone are 11GB on my 5.5G iPod)

 

[Doctor Q]

Please use the main discussion thread.