Is Ivanka trump going for the office of president?

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by JagdTiger, Jun 12, 2019.

  1. jkcerda macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
    #2
    Not watching an hour of obviously biased reporting.
     
  2. cube macrumors P6

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    #3
    Is the country still called the USA or was it renamed to E! in 2016?
     
  3. JagdTiger thread starter macrumors 6502

    JagdTiger

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2017
    #4
    Could be but here is one that could be just a little less biased.

    A new pizza gate scandal...Arts Technica.

     
  4. jkcerda macrumors 6502a

    jkcerda

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Criminal Mexi Midget
  5. JagdTiger thread starter macrumors 6502

    JagdTiger

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2017
    #6
    You would get better pay if you sold copper ones.
     
  6. raqball macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2016
    #7
    She can run if she wants.. Who cares? Don't like her message? The easy peasy solution is don't vote for her IF she runs...
     
  7. RichardMZhlubb Contributor

    RichardMZhlubb

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2010
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    #8
    I’m certainly not clicking on these videos, but the screen shots say they are from “TruNews.” For perspective on that source:

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...-interviewed-trump-jr/?utm_term=.c36b6b24ba90
     
  8. JagdTiger, Jun 12, 2019
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2019

    JagdTiger thread starter macrumors 6502

    JagdTiger

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2017
    #9
    It’s only racist if it’s not about Christians.
    --- Post Merged, Jun 12, 2019 ---
    If they are going to call Rick Wiles a conspiracy nut then they should have been saying this about George Noory from coast to coast radio.
     
  9. ucfgrad93 macrumors P6

    ucfgrad93

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Colorado
    #10
    Thread title doesn’t have the name correct.
     
  10. cube macrumors P6

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    #11
    Which dissapointed me.
     
  11. appleisking macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    May 24, 2013
    #12
    OP you have a bad habit of sourcing garbage sites. If you want to be taken seriously, maybe stop doing that?
     
  12. JagdTiger thread starter macrumors 6502

    JagdTiger

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2017
    #13
    Fixed.
    --- Post Merged, Jun 12, 2019 ---
    Garbage sites?, like all the mainstream politically correct news media?
     
  13. LordVic macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    #14
    While nobody is saying that,

    TruNews is about on par with Breitbart.

    it's a "news" agency that has outright stated in their own description that they skew everything within a specific world view.

    That is NOT accurate and proper news reporting if you have to manipulate the news to come to a specific conclusion that fits within your world view. that right there negates it and any thing they report as dubious.

    You might LIKE how they present and you might agree with their conclusions. But they are purposely catering to your already pre-concieved conclusions. GOOD news does not do that but tells facts as they are and let you as the viewer interpret that into your own world view.

    What we really need here is a list of known "Good" news sites that have verifiable sources and known to not put their own world view spin on things to the point that they change the news to fit their narrative. TruNews does NOT fit this bill. (many legit news sites don't either).

    Simply put. TruNews is 100% propaganda. they pretty much outright say that in their own description.

    Also holy hell i made the mistake of reading the comments on some of those videos... Holy crap are there some stupid hateful people who follow that nonsense.
     
  14. RichardMZhlubb Contributor

    RichardMZhlubb

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2010
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    #15
    If you can’t tell the difference between the Washington Post, for example, and TruNews or naturalnews.com, then you have a problem.
     
  15. JagdTiger thread starter macrumors 6502

    JagdTiger

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2017
    #16
    Well corporate news such as nbc, msnbc, Fox, cbs, abc and especially cnn are biased and therefore cannot be legit news sources.
     
  16. LordVic macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    #17
    Try other sites then. I recommend Canada's CBC or UK's BBC for far more accurate and factual reporting.

    These are also both non-profit making entities so they tend not to skew towards clickbait and hyperbole. They're also non-US so tend to avoid getting into the deep weeds regarding US politics and the nonsense surrounding them.

    Either way, even if you don't like NBC, MSNBC, FOX, CBS, ABC, CNN doesn't change the fact that historically, all of them (yes EVEN FOX) have far more rigid news reporting standards than TruNews. While many of these tend to layer their opinions on top of the news facts (and it's fair that if you don't like those opinions), doesn't change the truth behind the news themselves that they report.

    Simply put. Your opinion on "MSM" is irrelevant as it doesn't change the fact that TruNews is a propaganda and conspiracy channel aimed at a specific target audiences pre-concieved bias.

    if you want to do yourself a massive failure, Start looking at other sources than the ones you currently are using. Youv'e got a bad habbit of repeating a lot of nonsense on these forums that are completely unverifiable... or in cases (like chemtrails) myths have zero scientific backing.


    And if you can't tell the actual difference between journalism (even with opinions you don't agree with) and outright propaganda sites, than I don't know what else to tell you other than we, as a society have failed you and your critical thinking skills and for that, I'm sorry
     
  17. JagdTiger thread starter macrumors 6502

    JagdTiger

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2017
    #18
    The bbc lies too.
    --- Post Merged, Jun 12, 2019 ---
    Where is the evidence that chemtrails are not harming the environment?
     
  18. LordVic macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    #19
    I honestly can't take you seriously anymore..

    so in your opinion, the only people who don't lie are the ones you agree with...

    everyone else lies.


    that's not a reasonable or tennable argument and speaks of a personal problem. Not a problem with the news/media.
     
  19. JagdTiger thread starter macrumors 6502

    JagdTiger

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2017
    #20
    The news media is not to form opinions one way or the other because that is being biased.
    --- Post Merged, Jun 12, 2019 ---

    Have you not heard of the hiding of information the bbc did with molesting by the royal family and it’s own anchor men/woman?
     
  20. LordVic macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    #21
    you will never get 100% accuracy in news. PERIOD. END OF STORY. the problem is, you are taking one or two failures by these places as gross indictments against them... But then immediately fall back to sites that have absolutely zero credibility instead. You're basically saying "these guys are a little evil, so i'm going to trust 100% evil".

    it's nonsense. you can keep coming up with these little excuses, but the fact you STILL then fall back to unverifiable sources with zero credibility, your very argument about MSM's innacuracies are moot.

    you don't care about accuracy. You care about getting a narrative that you want. That itself is not evidence of the media's problem, but of your own.
     
  21. JagdTiger thread starter macrumors 6502

    JagdTiger

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2017
    #22
    Why not listen to both to get a more balanced news?, better to be centered when it comes to information and corporate news is a bought and sold entity with huge incomes which makes it easier for anchor men/woman to lie about the news.
     
  22. LordVic macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    #23
    Because not all views are equal.

    The idea that 'every side must have equal time and view' is nonsense garbage being perpetrated by those who have opinions that are based on bad facts.

    Simply put, Sites like TruNews don't deserve equal airtime and treatment due to the fact that they are not equal in their reporting.

    Your comment might make some sense if you were talking about something like comparing CNN and Fox and watching both to get an undersatnding of different viewpoints.

    But no. NOT all sites and sources deserve equal and fair treatment or time. especially when they can be verified to be non-factual propaganda nonsense like TruNews
     
  23. RichardMZhlubb Contributor

    RichardMZhlubb

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2010
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    #24
    Whatever your concerns regarding mainstream media, listening to something like TruNews doesn’t “balance” or “center” anything. It’s like arguing that you can better evaluate the nutritional value of a sandwich if you also eat a pile of dog crap.
     
  24. Loki.Mephisto macrumors 6502a

    Loki.Mephisto

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2005
    Location:
    Germany / Austria - Mozart, no Kangaroos!
    #25
    Chemtrails? Oh boy. You see why you can't be taken seriously?
     

Share This Page

40 June 12, 2019