Is the stock market ruining the country?

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by MacNut, Aug 14, 2014.

  1. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #1
    Corporations worry more about investors and the bottom line vs quality and employees. They will fire people to save money, drive up the price of goods to make investors happy. But who loses, your average american who is paying for it in the end. So does the stock market help the economy or make it worse? If the only people that can afford the services are those invested in the company.
     
  2. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #2
    The religion of "The Market" as the be all and end all of human existence is ruining humanity, not just the USA.

    Shock Doctrine Neoliberalism, AKA "Globalization" is a cancer and it's clear to see. The only reason why the USA gives a **** now is our leaders never expected it to boomerang back to us, but the architects are long gone from power (this is 40s-70's era stuff) and none of the idiots in charge now understood that safeguards that were in place were torn down chasing this pipe dream down the rabbit hole.
     
  3. LIVEFRMNYC macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    #3
    Projections(which mostly worthless) are treated like financial quotas, and the average person gets the raw deal from it. So YES, it's ruining the country or the potential this country really has.
     
  4. Eraserhead macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #4
    Its not. Globalization has lifted billions out of poverty.
     
  5. MacNut thread starter macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #5
    And pushed others into it.
     
  6. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #6
    And pushed just as many into slave labor conditions around the world. It is the very act of allowing corporations to shop around sweatshop labor to wherever the cheapest labor prices are, then abandon those countries when the next one comes along to slash worker protections further than the last.

    Take a look at Catapillar's intentional overproduction capabilities around the world. They spent the better part of a decade threatening their workers to accept **** conditions or they would pick up and leave because they had more factories than they needed, which was intentional. This is par for course with multinational corporations. No allegiance to their countries, workers, or humans in general, just the almighty dollar.
     
  7. mobilehaathi macrumors G3

    mobilehaathi

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2008
    Location:
    The Anthropocene
    #7
    No, no, no. A capitalist economy serves to enrich everyone. It is always fair. Any incidental concentration of power and money is in the best interest of everyone.

    I smell a pinko.

    :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
     
  8. rrl macrumors 6502

    rrl

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
  9. Eraserhead macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #9
    For sure, there have been losers as well as winners. I would estimate the number of losers at something like 100 million, which is around 1/10th or less compared to the number of winners.
     
  10. shinji macrumors 65816

    shinji

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    #10
    Nope. If a business needs cash to expand, it's either sell equity in the market or take on debt. Apple wouldn't be where it is today without the market, and neither would tons of other major employers and the companies they depend on.

    It's easy to look at the abuses and downsides and say the whole thing is toxic, but it's not. The stock market has a purpose beyond that, and it's too bad scary headlines deter people from it. If you don't own any stocks at all, even in funds, then I wish you luck saving for retirement.
     
  11. Eraserhead macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #11
    Of course you are right that capitalism is far from perfect, however capitalism, as applied to the real world, has lifted billions of people out of poverty.

    Source? And you've got to prove more than developing world factories being a bit unpleasant as you've got to show that they are worse than subsistence farming, which is usually pretty brutal.

    ----------

    I'm sure this happens quite a lot, but it isn't universal.
     
  12. NT1440 macrumors G4

    NT1440

    Joined:
    May 18, 2008
    Location:
    Hartford, CT
    #12
    NAFTA, Mexico.

    Venezuela (one American Billionaire is using the market to make then entire country default on it's debts).

    Anywhere that Big Oil goes.
     
  13. Eraserhead macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #13
    How exactly has capitalism (as opposed to the war on drugs) harmed Mexico?

    Venezuela is a socialist country ;).
     
  14. chabig macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2002
    #14
    Without capital there are no businesses. Without businesses, we lose all of our goods and services.
     
  15. Bug-Creator macrumors 6502

    Bug-Creator

    Joined:
    May 30, 2011
    Location:
    Germany
    #15
    They only care about the bottom line as far as it effects their short term stock prices.
     
  16. noodlemanc macrumors regular

    noodlemanc

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Location:
    Australasia
    #16
    Ok, so what were people in third world countries doing before they were "pushed" into western factories? Were they in occupations where they earned more or less?
     
  17. MacNut thread starter macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #17
    Isn't America turning into a third world country now?
     
  18. vrDrew macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Location:
    Midlife, Midwest
    #18
    Neither the stock market nor corporations in general are responsible for America's social and economic woes.

    We - the voters are. If we pressured our legislator and lawmakers to do what was best for us - as citizens and as a nation - then the would right laws and regulations to control the worst impulses and actions of business.

    Take taxes: The reality is that the personal income tax rates on corporate executives and investors are at historical lows. But rather than inch those rates back up a point or two (to where they were during the Reagan years) - we whine and moan about deficits. And cut spending on vital infrastructure projects and unemployment benefits.

    Same with employment law: things like vacation pay; minimum wages; and worker rights. Over the past couple of decades we've gutted them. With the result that big corporations - from Wal-Mart to McDonalds pay part-time employees starvation wages.

    We have the power to tell our representatives what to do. Don't blame corporations or Wall Street: its our own fault.
     
  19. anonymouslurker macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 16, 2012
    #19
    It always makes me laugh whenever I read anybody saying this, and makes me wonder whether the person who says it has ever been to an actual third world country.

    Have you?

    I have.

    America is far from a third world country, and anyone who has actually been to any, would know what a ridiculous statement that is.

    It sure does sound good and scary, though.
     
  20. hulugu macrumors 68000

    hulugu

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Location:
    the faraway towns
    #20
    To a point, yes.

    Too many companies put the entire value of the company into hitting a target to keep the stock up and treat the stock market as a rational feedback system they can manipulate.

    The idea of value to shareholders is in long-term investments and profitability, but too many managers are driven by short-term bonuses and therefore try to manipulate profitability to make their numbers. This means that managers can gut a company and run it into the ground while making millions in bonuses and that the stock market valuation of a company often seems irrational.

    Apple and Amazon's stock provide a fairly clear view of the irrationality of the market. And, that's before we get into the deep weeds of the market's internal systems, which strike me as perverse.
     
  21. satcomer macrumors 603

    satcomer

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Location:
    The Finger Lakes Region
    #21
    I always felt that public companies get squeezed and their stock price downgraded if they don't have ever increasing profits from quarter to quarter! This is what is wrong with today's public trading and the companies themselves.
     
  22. senseless macrumors 68000

    senseless

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    Location:
    Pennsylvania, USA
    #22
    The stock market gives everyone an opportunity to become owners of the largest companies on earth. That's a powerful concept.
     
  23. impulse462 Suspended

    impulse462

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2009
    #23
    Pure propoganda. Someone buys 2 shares of google: all of a sudden they are so powerful.

    To answer the question though, no I don't think the stock market is ruining the US. The people who ruin it are greedy.
     
  24. MacNut thread starter macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #24
    The only people that really have a say are those with a lot of shares. These are the people running the companies. Not the board or executives. Don't get the big investors angry or they will cash out and cause the value to plummet. So why give shareholders so much power?

    ----------

    How many people are so far in debt that they are virtually poor. And what caused that. Wall Street.
     
  25. shinji macrumors 65816

    shinji

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    #25
    Because the shareholders, literally, own the company. If the stock market didn't exist, and every company were privately owned, then it would still be the owner(s) of the company who held that power.
     

Share This Page