Is the terrible low light vid/pic quality just an Apple thing?

Discussion in 'iPad' started by ACG12, May 22, 2016.

  1. ACG12 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2015
    #1
    So I played with my IPP 9.7 I picked up yesterday and just like all the other iPhones/iPads I own, the low light is horrible, noise central in the video/photos. When I bought my SE last month, I thought maybe it was the low quality screen, but now I see it in my IPP model.

    Not a huge deal, but for the price you pay for Apple Products, it seems Apple should give a camera that takes better low light pictures.
     
  2. Gav2k macrumors G3

    Gav2k

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2009
  3. RedOrchestra Suspended

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2012
    #3

    Ive only used my 9.7 iPP camera for document to PDF conversion so can't speak to low light but I also have an iPhone 6 and I think that camera handles low light situations very well - darkness without a flash, not so much.
     
  4. ACG12 thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2015
    #4
    I've used other phones that take better low light pictures, what are you trying to get at?
     
  5. augustya macrumors 68000

    augustya

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2012
    #5
    The picture taken from an 9.7" iPP also looks pixelated and definitely has a lot of Noise ! Maybe in low light but it definitely shows !
     
  6. Gav2k macrumors G3

    Gav2k

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2009
    #6
    The other phones taking better low light pictures will lack in other areas of the picture. Simple rule of thumb is if your taking lots of low light photos buy a decent camera that has a large sensor.
     
  7. ACG12 thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2015
    #7
    I have a DSLR, but it's not convenient to pull out of the closet when I want to take a quick video of my 1 year old doing something I want to remember years from now. Again, it's not a huge deal, just thought that by now we'd get something better for that. Maybe the dual lense IP7 will be the one!
     
  8. bensisko macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Location:
    The Village
    #8
    I agree low light is still something that needs to be worked on, but it is pretty universal. My iPhone 6+ is the best I've used so far (curiously my girlfriend's 9.7 iPad Pro isn't as good even though it's supposed to be the same). There are things you can do to improve the quality of a low light photo (apps, tripod, etc.) but nothing comes to mind for the point-and-shoot convenience (I.e. Pull out of the pocket at a moment's notice and shoot).

    The Nokia Lumia 1020 is pretty legand-(wait for it...)-airy when it comes to the camera. I've seen night shots taken with it and it's pretty amazing - to the point that I actually considered getting one and using it JUST as a camera.

    The camera keeps improving and the leap in lens from the 5 to the 6 was pretty huge. The low light shots are pretty difficult for a camera with such a small lens, but it will keep improving! Last week I took some great shots in Paris with the 6+ - then kicked myself for not using it more for photos (i was mostly using it as a wireless hot spot).
     
  9. Skika macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2009
    #9
    6(s)+ has optical stabilization which the ipad lacks and makes a world of difference in low light.
     
  10. baypharm, May 22, 2016
    Last edited: May 22, 2016

    baypharm macrumors 65816

    baypharm

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2007
    #10
    I have both Android and iPhone 6s+ and all the current iPads. Not one takes acceptable low light pictures as far as I am concerned and most definitely not on par with a good digital camera. I don't buy telephones/ipads to use as cameras. I understand the convenience argument you bring up: "the best camera is the one you have on you when you need it....." To get those memories of your little one, just turn up the lights. You are expecting way too much from the iPhone/iPad small lens and associated software.
     
  11. pika2000 macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2007
    #11
    Horrible compared to? DSLR? Well good point captain obvious. :D

    There's this thing called physics. A phone camera sensor, based on its size, will never be able to absorb as much light as an APS-C sensor.
     
  12. smacrumon Suspended

    smacrumon

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2016
    #12
    Exactly. I think this is an Apple thing. I've used other phones before, specifically Nokia many years ago. The low light automatically was corrected in that old Nokia phone. There are some camera apps in the App store that do a better job at adjusting for low light conditions. One I've used in the past is Camera 360. I stopped using it because my device could not handle the new update.
    I might be wrong, but I believe automatic low light modes use more battery power which might be why Apple has chosen a more conservative approach.
    One other thing, you can tap the screen in a dark area when using the camera to adjust the white balance which can improve the lighting under certain circumstances.
     
  13. ACG12 thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2015
    #13
    No horrible compared to other android phones. But I guess I shouldn't be surprised, Apple stuck a potato in their $1300 netbook.
     
  14. pika2000 macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2007
    #14
    Here's a good video talking about smartphone cameras:
    Takeaway point is, image processing. Some manufacturers do more to massage the picture, some do less, some do different things. It's a personal preference.

    I have used many Android phones, and they are not any better per se. Sure, they may be better at certain conditions, but they suffer on others. Heck, Sony, the company that makes pretty much everybody's sensors, doesn't have the best pictures themselves as shown by many reviewers. It's subjective.
     
  15. masotime macrumors 68000

    masotime

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2012
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    #15
    Are there any tablets out there now with a better low-light performing camera than the iPP 9.7".....?
     
  16. bensisko macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Location:
    The Village
    #16
    Tablets? No way. Phones you can find "better" cameras (with other trade offs) than the iPhone, but you won't find a tablet that has a better camera than the 9.7" Pro.
     
  17. ACG12 thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2015
    #17
    No, but other tablets on the market are a bit cheaper. Not really a fair comparison.
     
  18. masotime macrumors 68000

    masotime

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2012
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    #18
    To be fair, you are paying more for a camera that is unmatched within the tablet space at the moment. If there were a cheaper tablet with approachable quality, then I'd agree that Apple is currently overpriced. They appear to be "peerless" at the moment though, like when they first launched Touch ID.

    I've often wondered why tablets usually had inferior cameras compared to their smartphone counterparts. Apple looks to be the first to break the trend with the iPP 9.7", hopefully other (flagship) tablets will follow suit.
     
  19. ilman92 macrumors newbie

    ilman92

    Joined:
    May 5, 2016
    #19
    Lowlight image quality is pretty decent though if you set the ISO manually using 3rd party apps.
     

Share This Page