Is there a benefit to having totalfinder AND pathfinder on my mac?

Discussion in 'Mac Apps and Mac App Store' started by eroxx, Jun 22, 2011.

  1. eroxx macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
  2. maflynn Moderator

    maflynn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Location:
    Boston
    #2
    dare I'd say personal preference.

    I haven't tried totalfinder, but then I'm happy with pathfinder.
     
  3. eroxx thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    #3
    thanks! I'm also trying to figure out if it's redundant to have both
     
  4. GGJstudios macrumors Westmere

    GGJstudios

    Joined:
    May 16, 2008
    #4
    Most likely, it is. They both do basically the same thing.
     
  5. Young Spade macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2011
    Location:
    Tallahassee, Florida
    #5
    I don't think you need more than one; I use TotalFinder right now and love it but I haven't ever really looked at PathFinder. I guess if you can afford it and there are certain features that each have that you need; if not then there's no reason.
     
  6. Mrguidogenio macrumors regular

    Mrguidogenio

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2011
    Location:
    Argentina
    #6
    I use TotalFinder because it's integrated into the Mac native Finder, unlike PathFinder which acts a s a standalone, Finder replacement, app
     
  7. eroxx thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    #7
    I have been using totalfinder as well, but I am finding it becoming a little annoying in terms of usability .. I really like that you can have "bookmarks" in pathfinder ... I don't know
     

Share This Page